- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ESPN being very careful what comes out their mouths on the Mulkey situation
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:20 am
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:20 am
I just watched them discuss this on First Take. They restrained themselves from bashing Mulkey . Shannon Sharpe even admitted she has a right to get lawyers. Good glad to see Kim strike fear in the media now. Enough is enough with the bashing. If you can’t back it up then I’m all for Kim making them cut checks.
27
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:23 am to Kody
I'm surprised the media has the balls to continue going on these unjust crusades against people. There have been some very expensive defamation lawsuits against media companies over the last decade in various situations.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:26 am to Kody
Cold pizza > first take
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:33 am to Kody
Hard to have an opinion on something when you have no idea what is even going on.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:37 am to Kody
Im pretty sure after the article is published the media can discuss and perpetuate the propaganda by simply stating, “ according to the Washington Post article, which if true, blah, blah, blah.”
Thus I expect no restraint from the media.
Im sure you will see Brittany Grenier as a frequent media guest in this discussion.
Thus I expect no restraint from the media.
Im sure you will see Brittany Grenier as a frequent media guest in this discussion.
This post was edited on 3/25/24 at 10:40 am
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:41 am to dj30
RE: dj30
Exactly! I don't think it's worth the time to think about what is in the article until it comes out.
Exactly! I don't think it's worth the time to think about what is in the article until it comes out.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:42 am to Kody
If it takes two years of hounding everyone KM knows to try to get someone to trash her, then you have a huge fictional nothing burger!
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:42 am to dj30
quote:
Hard to have an opinion on something when you have no idea what is even going on.
Exactly. This whole thing is dumb.
Is this a Sandusky situation? A pokey Chatman situation?
Like what is even the whole scope of this fricking article
This post was edited on 3/25/24 at 10:44 am
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:50 am to dj30
quote:
Hard to have an opinion on something when you have no idea what is even going on.
I think CKM and LSU have some ideas on where the writer is going because he sent them questions last Tuesday demanding answers by Thursday. I think that's what spurred her statement at the press conference. We, however, have no idea about it other than speculation.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:53 am to Kody
As they should
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:54 am to LSUDonMCO
I'm interested to see if Poole is one of the sources for the article. Other than the speculation that's gone on here, still no idea what exactly transpired there, but I could definitely see Poole having an ax to grind.
Other than dragging up all the old bs on Griner, I'm also interested to see if she made any new statements for the article. She seems to have quieted down a bit after her stint in a Russian prison. I think her experiences with a foreign criminal justice system has toned down her rhetoric quite a bit.
Other than dragging up all the old bs on Griner, I'm also interested to see if she made any new statements for the article. She seems to have quieted down a bit after her stint in a Russian prison. I think her experiences with a foreign criminal justice system has toned down her rhetoric quite a bit.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:55 am to CalTiger53
quote:
They go against anyone who is not aligned with their political agenda even if they may be excellent in their jobs, like Elon Mosk. Also, they want to make SC coach the face of women basketball and they think Mulkey is a big competition and the main goal here, IMO, is to hurt her recruiting. But this media biased that has gone on for a long time is back firing in sports and politics.
They will bury stories about those who agree with their politics and fabricate others that don't. Just who they are and "news" is their means to their ends.
They want a black face for basketball and Mulkey's in the way.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:57 am to CalTiger53
quote:
They go against anyone who is not aligned with their political agenda even if they may be excellent in their jobs, like Elon Mosk. Also, they want to make SC coach the face of women basketball and they think Mulkey is a big competition and the main goal here, IMO, is to hurt her recruiting. But this media biased that has gone on for a long time is back firing in sports and politics.
This is what delusion looks like lol. Kim is just an unlikable personality to many and if not for her winning it wouldn't be as accepted as is. Dawn is already the face of women's basketball and is undefeated against Kim so there's that. This would be like defending the Les Miles article and saying its because they're trying to make Saban the face of football
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:57 am to sabbertooth
I doubt Griner talks about it at all. She's still shellshocked from her experience in Russia.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:58 am to dj30
quote:
Hard to have an opinion on something when you have no idea what is even going on.
True, but since when has the media let it's lack of knowledge on a subject stop them from commenting??
Posted on 3/25/24 at 10:59 am to kiNupe5
quote:
This is what delusion looks like lol.
This is what denial looks like lol.
Posted on 3/25/24 at 11:00 am to kiNupe5
quote:
This is what delusion looks like lol. Kim is just an unlikable personality to many
And Staley is just an utter delight?
Posted on 3/25/24 at 11:02 am to kiNupe5
quote:
Dawn is already the face of women's basketball and is undefeated against Kim so there's that.
This is not true at all. You don't think they played against each other when she was at Baylor?
This post was edited on 3/25/24 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 3/25/24 at 11:02 am to kiNupe5
quote:
This is what delusion looks like lol. Kim is just an unlikable personality to many and if not for her winning it wouldn't be as accepted as is. Dawn is already the face of women's basketball and is undefeated against Kim so there's that. This would be like defending the Les Miles article and saying its because they're trying to make Saban the face of football
What a retard of a post
Page 1 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News