- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fani wins
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:56 am to Pettifogger
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:56 am to Pettifogger
quote:
As noted previously, nearly all pro-law enforcement people/orgs in Fulton County supported Willis. She was the choice of Republicans in Fulton because the opposition was Paul Howard.
Mary Norwood is a centrist Republican but she's the heart of the Republican movement in Atlanta and was Fani's biggest backer.
Understood; however, none of that changes the factual nature of what I stated. The judge contributed to her campaign, regardless of the context or reasons for it. Paul Howard was awful as is Willis. Lesser of two evils still yields an evil.
1
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:59 am to ChineseBandit58
I'm so fricking sick of these haughty, untouchable, black women who have degrees and some semblance of academic achievement, but who still have a relatively low IQ. They are a danger to our society and a menace with their power
They are my absolute least favourite people.
They are my absolute least favourite people.
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 3/15/24 at 12:02 pm to SirWinston
Those ones you reference are also by all accounts very very bad about nagging.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The ruling accepts their relationships existed
Now the question is, did Wade make enough to not try to extort money from Fani? Since one of them is getting kicked off the case.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 12:19 pm to Jbird
quote:
Charging excess hours? That's not in dispute
It was blatant. SFP, even as an attorney won’t admit it though.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yikes. Did you even read the ruling? The precedent and guiding law?
What’s the precedent and guiding law for the prosecution?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:07 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I'm so fricking sick of these haughty, untouchable, black women who have degrees and some semblance of academic achievement, but who still have a relatively low IQ.
This has butt-hurt written all over it.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:11 pm to CreoleTigerEsq
Lol you have esquire as part of your screen name. You're exactly the type of person I'm talking about.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:11 pm to CreoleTigerEsq
quote:
This has butt-hurt written all over it.
Not really.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They did not have enough documentation to prove that Wade/Willis were lying
That was the out the trash judge used which is nonsense.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:46 pm to CreoleTigerEsq
Alright, Dr. CreoleTigerEsq, J.D.
I’m just joshing
I’m just joshing
Posted on 3/15/24 at 1:57 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I'm so fricking sick of these haughty, untouchable, black women who have degrees and some semblance of academic achievement, but who still have a relatively low IQ. They are a danger to our society and a menace with their power
Why do you think she has a relatively low IQ?
This sounds like something my racist grandpa would say...I'm not sure exactly what you wanted here except a trump win based on assumption?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:04 pm to oklahogjr
I’m confident in assuming that she’s low IQ because if a person is high IQ - logic wins out over emotion. And in this case that would look like a stark lack of the prosecution that she instituted, such as that it would not be a subject of our conversation whatsoever. That was the logical conclusion. But emotion obviously won out, so there you have it - low IQ.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:06 pm to weptiger
quote:
Understood; however, none of that changes the factual nature of what I stated. The judge contributed to her campaign, regardless of the context or reasons for it. Paul Howard was awful as is Willis. Lesser of two evils still yields an evil.
I'm just saying the idea of McAfee as beholden to Willis or a big fan of hers (implied by others if not you) is ridiculous.
McAfee is a Republican. Willis was the candidate of the Republicans/conservatives at the time. In terms of the Fulton County judiciary McAfee is probably as close to MAGA as you could find.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:12 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
McAfee is a Republican
Means frick all today
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:13 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Means frick all today
yawn
Perhaps his entire history and personal comments to friends and family over a couple of decades was all feigned acting leading to this moment of taking down Trump on novel RICO charges
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:18 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Conclusion Whether this case ends in convictions, acquittals, or something in between, the result should be one that instills confidence in the process. A reasonable observer unburdened by partisan blinders should believe the law was impartially applied, that those accused of crimes had a fair
p. 23
Page 23 23SC188947 opportunity to present their defenses, and that any verdict was based on our criminal justice system’s best efforts at ascertaining the truth.
Well this aint happening
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:21 pm to oklahogjr
quote:He's listened to her talk for more than 5 seconds.
Why do you think she has a relatively low IQ?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 2:32 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Why do you think she has a relatively low IQ?
Did you see her testimony on the stand? She makes a mental midget sound like Socrates.
Page 10 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News