- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fani wins
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:22 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:bullshite!
but not one based in evidence.
Once Bradley lied on the stand and others heard him lie, they volunteered to come forward. The judge declined to hear them.
That seems to be a trend ...
![](https://i.imgur.com/aDR9wdF.png)
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:22 am to doya2
Judge worked with her and has contributed to her campaign. I didn’t expect much to occur here.
The only thing that was proven by this whole charade is that she is biased, low character, compromised, etc. These things were known prior to the hearings.
The only thing that was proven by this whole charade is that she is biased, low character, compromised, etc. These things were known prior to the hearings.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:24 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Once Bradley lied on the stand and others heard him lie, they volunteered to come forward. The judge declined to hear them.
Ok let me clarify. When I say "evidence", I mean documentary evidence. Testimony is of very little value to me (and many in the system).
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:25 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Sfp doesn't like when I call our legal system trash even when overwhelming evidence points to that fact.
It’s like a Pharma salesman saying that our Pharma industry is totally above board. “You just don’t understand how it works!!!”
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:27 am to the808bass
quote:
It’s like a Pharma salesman saying that our Pharma industry is totally above board. “You just don’t understand how it works!!!”
You're combining 2 separate arguments.
You're making the argument of Patriot-types and I know you're smarter than that.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:29 am to Pettifogger
Penisflogger is on this thread
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:31 am to TigerFan112
quote:
He knows the truth, but he’s afraid of the consequences. What a coward.
The justice system in America is broken
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:34 am to Revelator
quote:
He knows the truth, but he’s afraid of the consequences. What a coward.
quote:
The justice system in America is broken
So if Trump is convicted on weak evidence because "they know the truth", we're cool with that now?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Lawfare lovers will rejoice.
So if Trump is convicted on weak evidence because "they know the truth", we're cool with that now?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:36 am to BHTiger
quote:
Judge: the defense FAILED to prove there was financial gain....disgusting.
I guess the,” I paid him back in cash” excuse works if you have black privilege
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:37 am to the808bass
This injection won't harm you
...yet
...yet
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:39 am to weptiger
quote:
has contributed to her campaign.
As noted previously, nearly all pro-law enforcement people/orgs in Fulton County supported Willis. She was the choice of Republicans in Fulton because the opposition was Paul Howard.
Mary Norwood is a centrist Republican but she's the heart of the Republican movement in Atlanta and was Fani's biggest backer.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:40 am to Pettifogger
quote:
As noted previously, nearly all pro-law enforcement people/orgs in Fulton County supported Willis. She was the choice of Republicans in Fulton because the opposition was Paul Howard.
Mary Norwood is a centrist Republican but she's the heart of the Republican movement in Atlanta and was Fani's biggest backer.
They refuse to see nuance or any grey.
It's pure in/out group dynamics.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:42 am to the808bass
quote:
Stop with the dream scenarios. This is a loss. A predictable loss given where we are as a country. But it’s a loss. Imagining how it’s a win isn’t going to help.
This.
If they didn’t rule against Fani in a case where the bar is simply,” the appearance of impropriety” why would we expect any other miracle ruling to take place? The system is irrevocably broken and rigged. There is no justice in America.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:43 am to Revelator
quote:
If they didn’t rule against Fani in a case where the bar is simply,” the appearance of impropriety” why would we expect any other miracle ruling to take place? The system is irrevocably broken and rigged. There is no justice in America.
Yikes. Did you even read the ruling? The precedent and guiding law?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Right. Geofence data, travel expenses, and documented extraordinarily high f**kbuddy payments on the state dime notwithstanding.
When I say "evidence", I mean documentary evidence.
quote:This case makes that obvious.
Testimony is of very little value to me (and many in the system).
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:50 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Geofence data, travel expenses,
The ruling accepts their relationships existed
quote:
documented extraordinarily high f**kbuddy payments on the state dime
Assumptions not in evidence. That's the whole issue
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yikes. Did you even read the ruling? The precedent and guiding law?
No and I’m not a lawyer. But the legal scholars that I listened to said that only the appearance of impropriety was the standard used to determine if Fani and Wade should be removed from the case or at the extreme, the case dismissed. Apparently, the judge didn’t feel that this very low bar was met.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Charging excess hours? That's not in dispute.
Assumptions not in evidence. That's the whole issue
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 3/15/24 at 11:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Well ... let's see.
Assumptions not in evidence. That's the whole issue
(1) The ruling accepts their f**kbuddy relationship existed
(2) Wade's billing is a matter of public record.
Were you unaware of that?
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 11:54 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)