“Can you define woke?”

Yep, its like "trans". No such thing. You don't need an adjective in front of man or woman, you are one or the other.

By calling them "trans" you are playing into the mentally ill game that they actually exist.

Honestly I wouldn’t play that game. Mostly because it’s actually a good linguistic trick by them, as usual as it’s the only thing in their entire lives they are good at. The word woke has become too broad to define what it needs to mean and I think that’s the position of most normies.

quote:

---

Can you define woke?”

---

Someone who is offended by everything, yet contributes, nothing.

quote:

---

“Can you define woke?”

---

People who operate under the principles of intersectionality, and aggressively try and enact social change.

Didn't the left already write books on this where they defined woke themselves?

Someone about to go broke.

If you believe in supernatural things like 300 year of trauma trapped in your DNA, then you are woke.

If you believe in supernatural things like a man can become a woman, you are woke.

Cultural Marxism

I just say it’s a “spectrum “

That’s the problem with wokeism and why it’ll never ever stop on it’s own.


Wokeness is based in the term related to “being awakened” to the social aspects of our world that need changing. This of course means that if you are a person who defines themselves by being “woke”, you’ll continue to find things that need changing whether they really do need changing or not. Somethings are fine just the way they are but to admit that, a woke person must agree to something completely counter to their entire approach to the world and everyone in it. Thus it doesn’t matter how far left/woke we go, they’ll always push further that direction because they quite literally don’t know how to interact with a world where they aren’t actively trying to change something. It will never be enough. There will always be a new frontier that must be “dismantled” which we have seen includes basic biology.