- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Garland to name Special Counsel for Trump criminal probe
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:39 pm to bamarep
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:39 pm to bamarep
quote:Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
Breaking: Garland to name Special Counsel for Trump criminal probe
If they ARE going to move forward with an investigation, appointment of a special counsel is really the only way to do it. Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG would be entirely inappropriate.
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 12:40 pm
16
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:42 pm to AggieHank86
It's actually impressive that you posted a response so quickly while beating off to the headline.
Well done.
Well done.
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:43 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside
No. I'm not setting aside anything to have a chat with you about "this is the way".
This is nothing more than the GOPE and the DEMS working to end the voters choice.
You only get to vote for who they say.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:45 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
How many fricking investigations do you think are needed? How many tens of millions of dollars?
How many times has biden been investigated with all the smoke (actual hard evidence) around him?
Answer that.
And you wonder why trust in govt is waning. I mean.. just holy shite.. what a bullshite govt we have.
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
Why set that aside?
they certainly have no problem disregarding any interest in Hillary e-mails, or other RICO activities with the 'charities', or her collusion with in the RUSSIA COLLUSION hoax, or the blatant corruption of the CLINTON/OBAMA/BIDEN admins, or the maladmnstration of the DHS/DoD/NHS/
There was/is mountains of evidence which would put ANY GOPer in similar circumstance in Leavenworth.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG
Then they need to remove the word JUSTICE for the Department of Justice. Rule of Law and Due process aren't part of our current justice system at this present time. We have moved into Banana Republic status when the enforcement arm of our laws is beholden to a political party.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:01 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
Well, unless you're a gdamnd Fascist, that's REALLY the only question that matters, a-hole...
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG would be entirely inappropriate.
Doesn't the SC still report to the AG?
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:34 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Conducting such an investigation
quote:
would be entirely inappro
Posted on 11/18/22 at 2:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If they ARE going to move forward with an investigation, appointment of a special counsel is really the only way to do it. Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG would be entirely inappropriate.
Hilarious. As if the Special Counsel appointed will be any less bloodthirsty and biased as Garland himself. Why don't you be honest for one second in your life and join the rest of the world in acknowledging what this is; an attempt to politically decouple witch-hunt 6.0 (or 7.0... Ive lost count) from the democrats ahead of this election.
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 11/18/22 at 3:06 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If they ARE going to move forward with an investigation, appointment of a special counsel is really the only way to do it. Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG would be entirely inappropriate.
Faggie, you conveniently try to make this about what’s right and wrong of this whole debacle but fail miserably in pointing out that going after a political opponent is ok if the one doing the investigation is a democrat. This is political bullshite and you know it. This is the deepstate going after an opponent that can’t be beaten without dragging him through the mud or by cheating in the election.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 3:56 pm to AggieHank86
Faggiehank spewing bullshite as usual
Posted on 11/18/22 at 3:56 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
No.
quote:
Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG would be entirely inappropriate.
Special Counsel is still under the supervision of Biden's AG and he could cancel it at any time.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 4:06 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
If they ARE going to move forward with an investigation, appointment of a special counsel is really the only way to do it. Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG would be entirely inappropriate.
Exactly. Think back to the Ken Starr investigation. A sitting president or a presidential candidate is best investigated and prosecuted by a special prosecutor who does not report to the administration.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 4:12 pm to AggieHank86
quote:who was behind the raid on trumps residence precious? Are you now agreeing that was "entirely inappropriate?"
Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG would be entirely inappropriate.
Salon.com
By AREEBA SHAH
Staff Writer
PUBLISHED OCTOBER 7, 2022 12:30PM (EDT)
quote:
Attorney General Merrick Garland drew criticism from former federal prosecutors on Thursday over his handling of the Justice Department's investigation into classified records seized from former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 6:49 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
No lets not!!!
Lets set aside what kind of investigation and talk about if you think it is warranted!!!
Do you???
Posted on 11/18/22 at 9:02 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted
Why would anyone set that aside?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News