- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vaccine Narrative Collapses as Harvard Study Shows Jab More Dangerous than COVID
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It seems that the booster would cause a substantial risk of more Serious Adverse Events compared to estimated Covid-19 hospitalizations averted from the vax/booster.
Unpossible.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:45 am to geauxjuice
quote:
taking a shot in the dark because im not clicking... does the website have a tagline at the top that says something like "#1 news source for PATRIOTS who are TIRED of FAKE NEWS"
When googling it, the tagline is "The only place for real and honest news in the state of Florida."
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:45 am to conservativewifeymom
quote:
You've already read all 50 pages of the study?!?! Yeah, sure.
I've read about 25 so far.
And why did you respond with this when I asked you to cite where the study argues your OP
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:46 am to conservativewifeymom
quote:
Shows Jab More
quote:
Jab
![](https://i.imgflip.com/28wmke.jpg)
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:46 am to Wabbit7
The very fact that you've taken leave of your thinking abilities is proof something's wrong.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:46 am to conservativewifeymom
Ortho doctors advising patients getting Boots put on to take baby aspirin to help avoid clotting.
Yep. That’s happening all over.
Yep. That’s happening all over.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:46 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Unpossible.
Only the most hardcore vax zealots thought 18-29 year olds were the population cohort at serious risk of CV19 complications
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:47 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Mostly peaceful Vaccine
From a mostly truthful CDC.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only the most hardcore vax zealots thought 18-29 year olds were the population cohort at serious risk of CV19 complications
Unfortunately, those were the people directly influencing and making policy.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 11:48 am
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:47 am to conservativewifeymom
You mudbloods were warned and yet you all drilled down harder on the tyranny and stupidity.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:47 am to conservativewifeymom
It’s only more dangerous if you don’t get enough of the vaccine. I get one monthly so that I’m sure it stays effective.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 11:48 am
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:48 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Unfortunately, those were the people directly influencing and making policy.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Fauci is literally more than 4x the lower age of that cohort
Most governmental policy is made by boomers or old Gen X
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:49 am to GetCocky11
quote:
1) no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for this age group; 2) vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people; 3) mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission; 4) US mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and 5) mandates create wider social harms.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:51 am to conservativewifeymom
quote:
Really?!?! You read all 50 pages of the study by Harvard and Johns Hopkins in, what, 5 minutes?!?! AND had time to adequately analyze it and draw conclusions that counter the conclusions of hundreds of experts? Sure....
Actually, I work as a scientific researcher and can rather quickly glean several key facts.
First, it's self-published.
Second, it hasn't gone through peer review.
Third, it doesn't have a scientific methodology. It's an argumentative essay that inductively tries to draw an argument through a tenuous, cherry-picked selection of existing data. It has all the argumentative strength of a first-year college essay. (This is ethically questionable for an article purporting to be science-driven.)
Fourth, the argumentative nature of the essay is likely influenced by the "Wellcome Foundation," which paid these researchers to self-publish the paper. (This is also ethically questionable.)
So, yes, I do this for a living, and articles like these are a dime a dozen, ranting on all sorts of topics. When I see one of these articles, I make a mental note to question the authors' veracity in the future because I know they can be easily bought off.
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 11:57 am
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:52 am to conservativewifeymom
Preprints are becoming accepted in the scientific world as it gets the study out in the academic community sooner than when waiting for peer review. But preprints also are open to crackpot studies such as the one the OP posted.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:52 am to conservativewifeymom
quote:
The very fact that you've taken leave of your thinking abilities is proof something's wrong.
How's that? I am told that the boosters help improve my cognitive abilities!
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Fauci is literally more than 4x the lower age of that cohort
Most governmental policy is made by boomers or old Gen X
Fauchi isn't solely responsible for that shite. It took a village.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:53 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Fauchi isn't solely responsible for that shite. It took a village.
quote:
Most governmental policy is made by boomers or old Gen X
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How much of the study have you read?
More than she understands
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 9/15/22 at 11:56 am to Zappas Stache
quote:
But preprints also are open to crackpot studies such as the one the OP posted.
I told you Harvard wouldn't count anymore. In fact, I guess all the institutions involved in this study aren't valid anymore.
![](https://i.postimg.cc/bNcNYX7g/20220915-115606.jpg)
This post was edited on 9/15/22 at 11:57 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)