conservativewifeymom

What exactly gives you the impression that he didn't?!?! Even if he didn't intend to, it is terrible PR and a terrible look. How it's perceived DOES matter!

NO! There are many other ways to show respect other than going snorkeling in his swim trunks or whatever other snorkeling attire he was wearing.

He's Indian, he could have thrown flower petals or done one of the other Indian rituals that are associated with funerals and memorials. He could have launched lit lanterns. Whatever...... It is NOT a recreational spot, and I hope it never becomes one.

This is a photo from 1998 when she graduated.

She DOES NOT look like this anymore.

And she's probably not Mormon.

Oh dear, it must be THAT time of the month! Guess she won't be having a good weekend. :rotflmao:

To what end?!?!

I most certainly DID NOT vote for this. :angry:

LINK

The Supreme Court of Maryland has found Montgomery County does not have the authority under state law to prohibit wear-and-carry permit holders from bringing guns within 100 yards of certain public places, according to an April 28 opinion.

The case before the state’s highest court, Engage Armament LLC, et al. v. Montgomery County, Maryland, centered on a series of county law changes aimed at cracking down on gun violence. It now heads back to the Montgomery County Circuit Court in Rockville for further proceedings in accordance with the state Supreme Court’s opinion.

Mark Pennak, president and counsel for the gun rights group Maryland Shall Issue, told Bethesda Today in a Friday interview that the county law changes at issue in the case created thousands of de-facto gun-free zones that “basically made it impossible to carry in the county, because you couldn’t move around with a firearm.”

“The county has been given authority to do some of that, but they went and way overstepped it, as the court held,” said Pennak, who represented the lead plaintiff before the Maryland Supreme Court. “We regard the opinion basically as a win.”

Pennak said he is also aware of multiple cases pending in federal court through which the U.S. Supreme Court could elaborate on the “sensitive places” issue, including one challenging Maryland’s list of sensitive places as unconstitutional.

“There’s a lot of overlap between the state law and the county law. It’s not the same, but there’s overlap,” Pennak said. “So it makes sense to wait until this gets all sorted out.”

Camilla returned to the UK by herself because she really dislikes flying and it was never planned for her to continue to Bermuda. She wants to minimize the amount of flying as much as possible.

As for the Union Jack, I learned something new today. I'm quite certain I would not have been able to tell if it was upside down or right side up until now (maybe).

Not if it excludes non-Muslims. Can you imagine a Whites-only Day?!?!

If they know what's good for them.....

Nope, this Muslim bias is a more existential threat to America.

LINK

A taxpayer-funded Texas waterpark has sparked backlash by organizing a Muslim-only day to celebrate Eid.

Epic Waters in Grand Prairie, Texas drew outrage this week as it released fliers for the June 1 event, which will demand a 'modest dress code' and serve only Halal-slaughtered meat.

Posters for the event say it will be 'for Muslims only' to create a 'family-friendly environment', with tickets starting at $55 each.

The waterpark's website notes that men and women will not be separated during the event, but attendees are told to 'uphold Islamic etiquette' by 'lowering the gaze' throughout the day.

'Please follow the event’s modest dress code, and practice ?aya? (modesty) through respectful behavior,' the event says.

All attendees are 'expected to dress in accordance with Islamic values', and the waterpark says all swimwear must meet Muslim guidelines.


Can any of you imagine a Christians-only event at said park?!?! Me neither. :angry: And how exactly will they identify Muslims?!?! What if I choose to 'identify' as Muslim that day and wear my most revealing outfit?!?! This cannot stand.