- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What does the US gain by encouraging Sweden and Finland to join NATO?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:10 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:10 am
Why would we encourage this? So if they join NATO and are somehow attacked, we can now send billions of dollars to them too?!
28
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:14 am to Revelator
because conflict is profitable for folks like biden and the people who own the military industrial complex companies. Oh, and dont forget the people that finance wars on both sides (like the Bushes).
Then there is also that whole thing about the more scared people are (from things like viruses, wars, terrorists, etc.) the more they are willing to handover their freedom to governments in the name of security.
Then there is also that whole thing about the more scared people are (from things like viruses, wars, terrorists, etc.) the more they are willing to handover their freedom to governments in the name of security.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:15 am to Revelator
Poking the Bear so to speak
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:15 am to Revelator
NATO has become a useless organization. Not sure why it still exists.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:19 am to Revelator
US gains nothing.
US politicians and their DOD contractors make money off of war.
US politicians and their DOD contractors make money off of war.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:24 am to Big Gorilla
It’s not useless it is a way the US can encircle Russia with hostile vassal states to limit Russia’s geopolitical strength. It is also a way to make and send more advanced US made weapons with the advantage of being in a more strategically advanced position in relation to one of our rivals.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:25 am to Revelator
Why would we oppose their membership?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:32 am to Revelator
Personally I don't think we should be a part of NATO anymore but that said, adding Sweden & Finland brings brings in two well trained and funded militaries
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:32 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Why would we oppose their membership?
Because we should oppose the existence of NATO to begin with.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:33 am to Revelator
Missile staging
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:33 am to Revelator
The United States? Nothing.
The faction embedded within the United States that's controlled by the globalist cabal? The sky's the limit.
The faction embedded within the United States that's controlled by the globalist cabal? The sky's the limit.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:36 am to Revelator
Where does Russia stand on the World Bank?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:37 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Why would we oppose their membership?
They don’t bring any meaningful ability to defend us to the table.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:37 am to Revelator
The GLOBALIST Agenda!!
Father Bush was not even shy about it. The only mistake Reagan ever made was keeping the "Bush" alive.
Father Bush was not even shy about it. The only mistake Reagan ever made was keeping the "Bush" alive.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:39 am to Srobi14
quote:
It is also a way to make and send more advanced US made weapons with the advantage of being in a more strategically advanced position in relation to one of our rivals.
And where is the US coming up with the money to arm every ally in the world?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:39 am to Revelator
quote:Two countries that meet their military spending commitments?
What does the US gain by encouraging Sweden and Finland to join NATO?
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:40 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Why would we oppose their membership?
That not what I asked
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:40 am to Dawgfanman
quote:
They don’t bring any meaningful ability to defend us to the table.
That has never been a requirement, but both nations are more capable than most current NATO members, including Germany. Their location does provide us strategic value. And most of all, they are both asking to enter, and their membership costs us nothing whatsoever. Are you saying we should reject them just because Russia wants us to?
This post was edited on 5/17/22 at 8:41 am
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:40 am to Revelator
They're probably the only two members who would pay their full dues.
Posted on 5/17/22 at 8:41 am to Revelator
Missile defense, radar, and quick strike capabilities.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News