SEC Files New Brief Ahead Of LSU Eligibility Hearing, Greg Sankey Defends Former-Pro Ban

By Staff ReporterSep 2, 20265:02 pmDiscuss the story29
© Vasha Hunt-USA TODAY Sports
The SEC filed a new brief with a Louisiana court on Wednesday ahead of Thursday's preliminary injunction hearing in Baton Rouge over the ongoing eligibility dispute involving LSU and former professional players.

According to Yahoo Sports' Ross Dellenger, the filing includes an affidavit from SEC commissioner Greg Sankey and lays out the conference's argument for why it should maintain the authority to enforce its eligibility rules against member schools.

The SEC also argues that Sankey should not be held personally liable in the case.

In his affidavit, Sankey explained why the conference remains opposed to former professional players returning to college rosters.

"Each roster spot filled by a former pro athlete is a roster spot that becomes unavailable to a high school student-athlete or another less-developed athlete who would benefit from the educational & athletic growth opportunities uniquely available through college sports," Sankey said.

The filing comes one day before Thursday's key hearing in Baton Rouge, where a judge will consider whether to extend the current court protection preventing the SEC from enforcing its new eligibility rules and associated penalties.

LSU has been at the center of the dispute as the Tigers explore adding former NFL players to their roster. Lane Kiffin has maintained that LSU will follow whatever SEC rules are ultimately enforceable once the court provides further clarity.

29 Comments
user avatar
user avatar
Run DMC6 days
What about the roster spot the guys coming back would have never given up had the NCAA not created this mess to start with?
user avatar
ninthward6 days
Greg Sankey - seriously frick You dude, you have an axe to grind with LSU, and its 100% obvious. Secondly the players are not taking roser spots for another player, does he not know how this works?
user avatar
Croozin26 days
"Each roster spot filled by a former pro athlete is a roster spot that becomes unavailable to a high school student-athlete"

student-athlete. We playing school again?
user avatar
BBQ6 days
Ok, what about Trinidad chambliss or Diego Pavia. Are we fining those schools half of their operating budget and suspending their coaches for half a season since they played players that took a spot from someone younger and less developed. I mean I think he makes a valid point, it's just why did nobody lose their mind until it was LSU.
user avatar
JackieSonnier6 days
This isn’t about feelings anymore. Millions of dollars being payed to players has made it a business. In business the best person gets the job. These people don’t care about highschool athletes give me a break
user avatar
Capo6 days
These guys are only looking for their 5th year of eligibility like everyone else.

That argument is absurd considering that there are 6 and 7 year guys playing this year.

It’s definitely punishment to LSU for taking Kiffin.

user avatar
YMCA6 days
If those open spots could be filled with someone that would benefit the team now or in the long run better than the so called NFL guys, I imagine LK would sign them. They're going through all of this shite for guys that may not even start and only have one year to play before trying their hand at the NFL again. This is some of the dumbest shite ever and I watched an Ole Miss judge grant a QB, that would've gone in the first round, another year bc he had a sore throat 4 years ago that can't be verified.
user avatar
Skanky is a complete MORON. Clearly he is thinking with his compassion lobe/Libtard and not his consequencial lobe. He needs to be fired effective immediately!
user avatar
LSUDAN16 days
Sankey is a bitch
user avatar
king476 days
Missouri nfl rb rules eligible.. outrage,?
user avatar
Purple Spoon6 days
Now we are worried about high school athletes? Now??
user avatar
IM_4_LSU6 days
Ignorance at its finest.
user avatar
LSUDUCKMAN676 days
If the Gumps were doing this would be a completely different situation. We all know Sankey is a Gump!
user avatar
tirebiter6 days
It's pathetic that Sankey put forth weak arse sauce the day prior to the hearing tomorrow. He needs to be shown the door as these past two years from him have been useless to the conference.
user avatar
2geaux6 days
Hey Stankey you doth protest a little too much! You didn’t protest the basketball player at Bama that played 3 yrs of pro G League
user avatar
porge71066 days
Sankey is the biggest douche!!!
user avatar
NorthstarinLA6 days
Why does anybody pay attention to Dellenger he is just a ball licker at his best. A hack
user avatar
markthetiger6 days
What roster spot is being taken away from a HS athlete when the signing day is in February and the ruling came down in June?... Also, this won’t happen in other time, because the ruling is new to 2022 class. Won’t be new now.
user avatar
CeasarA2916 days
So...we care about educational growth now. Got it.
user avatar
Lmao….how in the holy hell will LSU or any other school bringing back a player “now” affect a single high school student?? They are in high school…playing high school football. They won’t be coming to a college program until next year…AFTER this season is OVER! What a ding dong!
user avatar
TutHillTiger6 days
Good luck with that ??
Popular Stories
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram