LSUtigerNVegas9

How can the NCAA say what someone is worth on the open market AND enforce it without a CBA? Especially if it’s an outside company using the players’ NIL for marketing and advertising purposes. Big companies spend millions and millions a year on marketing. The only leg I can see the NCAA having to stand on if it’s a donor that doesn’t own a company. As long as the donor that’s forking over the NIL owns a company and can pay for it, why wouldn’t it stand in court? It’s for marketing purposes. Also, not all marketing goes well and ends in profits. So the NCAA can’t argue that. It happens all the time. A good lawyer would eat that argument up.

Well, the way the Supreme Court has stated their intentions, short of a CBA and Union, they’ll rule in favor of the player. They don’t like the NCAA restrictions on what a player can make. Take random athlete A. He just sues and says I didn’t agree to the House settlement. That was made without my approval. I didn’t have a union rep or representative making my feelings known. Now, I’m being given the opportunity to make x amount of money and the NCAA is restricting it. Remember, the NFL has a monopoly and it’s allowed because pretty much all players are in the union and sign off on all CBA matters. The NFL has actually lost in court to the USFL for being a monopoly.


This is from Google

Legal Challenges: The settlement faces ongoing scrutiny and potential challenges, with some arguing it doesn't fully resolve fairness issues.


It WILL be challenged and the players will win. Just like before.

We still took their HC when they were in the playoff and we only won 7 games! End of debate, we win!!!!! :doublebird: :spank:

That’s coming from someone who claims a state that MAX has a show called “Florida Man”. Care to guess what it’s about?

First off, you’re the one making asinine statements backed up with absolutely zero facts. Secondly, you’re the one with the boyfriend, so your mouth wraps around his cock. That would make you the dick sucker! Just stop while you’re ahead. You won’t win this debate. :doublebird:

I know I’ll get downvoted but go ahead. Durham has got more potential than Lacy. I want to see how he does in this new scheme with a new RB coach. Bro ran for 200+ in the first half of the 6A state title game in Texas. He runs a legit 10.4 in the 100. Him and Berry could be the best RB tandem in CFB next year.

Yep. Michigan has a 12 million reasons for why he won’t see the field. Now, if Underwood got hurt, that’s a different story.

Could it be the one that hasn’t won a natty in the 21st century? I mean, this century is a quarter gone already AND add in the last 12 years of the 20th century since ND has won anything of significance!

Well, your aptitude for football is sorely lacking for all the games you say you’ve attended, if you continue to make posts about LSU’s 2019 team being worse than ANY Alabama team, ANY Tennessee team or ANY Indiana team. You need to pay attention to the action on the field.

If you know which play they will call, especially a passing play, you can scheme the QB to throw it where you want them to. The odds of good things happening goes up almost infinitely. I’m not saying IU is cheating. I actually highly doubt they are. But you can definitely cheat in football.

ONE big difference buddy, LSU has won MULTIPLE nattys in football in the last 25 years. Pearl Harbor is more recent than the last Aggie natty in football.