- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: One fricking minute?
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:37 pm to Keys Open Doors
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:37 pm to Keys Open Doors
the stoppage time bullshite has been vastly questionable
2
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:38 pm to castorinho
fricking communist pussies
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:38 pm to OutofTownAlumni
quote:
USA scored 1 goal in 120 minutes what makes u think they would score one in one more minute?
COMPLETELY irrelevant.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:38 pm to castorinho
FIFA will never allow the US to win the World Cup. Everyone needs to realize this.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:39 pm to Eighteen
It could have been more laughable. They could have said "2 minutes", but then later change it to "1 minute".
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
There are a lot of people who seem to think we got 1 minute for the entire second half and added time.
Of course we got 6 minutes, not one. For this game, I don't have a single complaint about the official. He did a great job.
For Portugal, I think 4 was better than 5, but it's within reason.
Of course we got 6 minutes, not one. For this game, I don't have a single complaint about the official. He did a great job.
For Portugal, I think 4 was better than 5, but it's within reason.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:40 pm to SCTmo
quote:
And yet you're going to get a number of traditionists coming on here telling you that keeping a simple clock on screen that accumulates the stoppage time throughout a half is unnecessary and detrimental to the game.
Yes you will.
It's not why we lost.
But one thing that should be improved in soccer is the stoppage time. I don't care what the purist say. It's pretty obvious that stoppage time would give clarity to the game and it's a pretty easy thing to implement.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:40 pm to navy
quote:
The same people bitching right fricking now about FIFA ... will also come unglued at the suggestion of something as simple as a fricking clock that everyone can see.... can be stopped, started, etc.
You really just need a stoppage time clock if they don't want to actually start and stop the clock. So then everyone can see when exactly the stoppage time is being added.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
USA leading a half? 5 minutes of stoppage. Down? 1 minute. Fair.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:41 pm to bamabenny
quote:
FIFA will never allow the US to win the World Cup. Everyone needs to realize this.
If this is the accepted party line ... then why even bother?
Better to say that FIFA would do anything to stop the USA from winning the Cup.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:41 pm to castorinho
Yeah, that kinda pissed me off...
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:42 pm to quail man
We got six minutes of stoppage time for 75 minutes of play. This is very reasonable.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:42 pm to castorinho
Muthafrickas from FIFraud
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:42 pm to castorinho
It's literally as simple as letting a stoppage clock run and then in reverse in countdown when full time is over.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:45 pm to quail man
Are they not suppose to give a minute of extra time per goal? So, that while final period there wasn't any more stoppage time?
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:47 pm to castorinho
There's never much stoppage time after 15 minutes of extra time.
Why are people comparing getting 1 after 15 to getting 5 after 45?
1 is the norm in extra time.
Why are people comparing getting 1 after 15 to getting 5 after 45?
1 is the norm in extra time.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:48 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
For this game, I don't have a single complaint about the official. He did a great job.
Overall yes, it wasn't terrible officiating at all. In ET most of the time the added time isn't much but this definitely deserved more than 1
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:49 pm to LSUTigers1986
quote:
1 is the norm in extra time
Not when you have 2 goals in the half.
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:56 pm to RB10
Wasn't tere 3 minutes and 2 goals after the first overtime period?
Posted on 7/1/14 at 5:58 pm to OutofTownAlumni
quote:
Posted by OutofTownAlumni USA scored 1 goal in 120 minutes what makes u think they would score one in one more minute?
Your strawman is in fire. Admit it, subjective time keeping is stupid.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News