Will Tucker become another Bill O’Rielly or Megyn Kelly?

William Devane is going to take his spot

quote:

---

their older conservative audience will always be with them

---

My Dad gave up on them outside of Tucker a long time ago. He was always in bed before Gutfeld

Megyn actually said today tuckers removal will be the end of fox.

quote:

---

Don’t kid yourself. They’ll find a replacement just like before.

---

Nah, they wont. This was the absolute dumbest decision that news station will ever make. Their shareholders should be losing their fking minds. I know I would if i had money in that shite station.

I think Tucker is different. Who else openly talks about how the national security state murders people, including American presidents, on national TV? Or about how Covid came from a lab and Fauci covered it up? Or how the vaccines sucked and caused harm? Or how the “deep state” is really just a bunch of overconfident morons who consistently make bad decisions?

I mean, maybe some others try, but none do it like Tucker. He was too good; therefore, he was too disruptive. No channel that wants corporate ad buys would keep him too long.

quote:

---

Will Tucker become another Bill O’Rielly or Megyn Kelly?

---

No.

Idk what he will plan out or map out for himself, but he was more talented than both of them, and he has already received tons of offers. Money is likely not the top factor in his process moving forward, if he's half as sincere as he seems frustrated and angry.

They can try to replace him, but you really can't. He is the premier talent out there for this type of show, and we all know it. Fox is in really, really deep shite.

As bad as I hate Fox MSM, it is not healthy right now for the "right" for them to fail, and don't think any network is too big to fail.

I’m watching Megyn on Eric Bolling’s show on Newsmax right now.

I think Tucker may be a different animal.

Regarding Megyn Kelly, she was always a phantom popularity figure; she had no, nor has she ever had any, real following. She was a favored pet of Fox News brass and then she had the infamous flashpoint with Trump, whereupon she was showered with insincere praise and attention from legacy msm media. But hardly anyone outside those little bubbles of Fox News brass and phony legacy msm media cared about her or what she had to say. That’s why she was a flash in the pan.

Regarding O’Reilly, he did have a devoted following that cared about what he had to say and tuned in to hear it. He had an anachronistic relationship with many at Fox News. The problem with O’Reilly, what followed him, was that he left in disgrace being a sexual perv and harasser of women. From making unwanted sexual advances, touchings, gropings, phone calls, sexting messages, etc, he was shown to be a gross old bully. In the height of the “me too” movement, his actions made him radioactive as a tv news personality. He was banished for some time.

Tucker may be different because A) unlike Kelly he has a legitimate audience, and B) unlike O’Reilly he isn’t leaving as a disgraced dirty old man.

And, moreover, I think the current time is quite different from what it was back when O’Reilly and Kelly were cast out. I think people are much more critical, cynical, impatient, distrustful than they were back then. I think Fox News would be making a mistake to take it’s audience for granted.

Of course, this is only a theory and my opinion. Time will ultimately tell.

quote:

---

That’s why she was a flash in the pan.

---

That’s complete BS. She currently sits in the top 50 in every podcast category and consistently sits in the top 5 in political podcast. Flash in the pans disappear, Kelly evolved. Also, while she is certainly nice to look at she does her homework. I’m a podcast junkie and few do it as well as she does.

I expect hannity will lose some of his audience. Laura too. Tucker was a great lead in for them. Losing orielly didn't hurt fox because of tucker.