Prettyboy Floyd

quote:

---

nfortunately for Manafort, Stone and Papadopolous, their crimes were the direct result of their own actions DURING the

quote:

---

Russia collusion

---

investigation. In Manafort's case other legitimate, unrelated crimes were discovered.

---

An investigation that was made up. It never happened - It was a coup to take down a sitting president. A fake crime where they made people spend millions of dollars in money in court to defend themselves against somethign that never happened. And you think that's ok?

Real good humans we have in here

I would have lied to , frick the FBI - FKING CROOKS

quote:

---

You wouldn't get arrested for telling a criminal investigator to go frick himself. You also wouldn't get arrested for exercising your 5th amendment rights while under oath. But lying to congressional investigators, the FBI or the Special Counsel and destroying documentation that you were instructed to preserve are still crimes. That's what Manafort, Stone and Papadopoulos all went to prison for. The only reason the Mueller Report didn't find Trump guilty of obstruction is because he had his minions take the bullets for him.

---

How can one lie about a crime that didn't happen.

How can one lie or obstruct a made up crime.


Say for instance a person is charged with a made up crime - I deny said crime - tell them they are full of shyt - say that what you're accusing me of is bullshht and don't cooperate with you're bullshite - you then charge me with obstruction and say that I'm lying about said crime that never happened - you can then arrest me about a crime that never happened with made up crime of obstructing an investigation into a non crime.


Exactly how 3rd world dictatorships operate -
The crime is in the process - and they hang you on their fake investigation that they concocted. Fking laughable


The real criminals are the people charging others with made up crimes. Scum

Robert Mueller and Andrew Weismann and every piece of shyt involved in this investigation should have been hung.

quote:

---

he "not exonerating for obstruction"

---

You can't obstruct a crime that didn't happen.


Basic legal theory

quote:

---

He's not wrong

---

Is he supposed to say nice things about someone that falsely tried to put him in prison and was paid to do so?

quote:

---

Was there illegal activities / mistakes? Ask convicted Guilliani, or Log Cabin Lindsey Graham.

GA is a Red state, run by Republicans doing all to protect Republicans, for now. Shut down Fannie

Kemp controlled voting, deleted many voters while running & winning.

This is hoax/witch hunt, nobody has seen anything like it. Release the files Pam

---

You might be the dumbest person on this site and this site has the likes of tarzana and 4cubbies.

Wear it with pride

quote:

---

That's a pivot

---

That's a fact


The entire case was bullshite and you're using examples of them extended it a month perfectly extended to get Trump within the 5 year window with a year and two months added on. Totally on the up and up.

quote:

---

Statutes of limitations and statutes of repose that would otherwise expire during the period between March 16 and April 6, 2020 are hereby extended to April 7, 2020.” A copy of the order is available here.

---

quote:

---

On March 13, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana entered Administrative Order 2020-1 under which “[p]rescriptive, preemptive and statute of limitation deadlines are hereby interrupted until April 13, 2020.”

---

The Trump case was essentially a year and 2 months.

quote:

---

The judge chose not to address it in his ruling, but prosecutors also argued in opposing Trump's motion to dismiss that New York criminal procedure law allows the statute of limitations deadline to be extended when someone has been "continuously outside" of the state. Prosecutors contend Trump's presidency, from 2017 to 2021, met this standard, extending the charging window.

---

quote:

---

Appeals over the statute of limitations often boil down to an argument over when the clock started running, Stanley Brand, a former general counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives and distinguished fellow at Penn State Dickinson Law, told USA TODAY. That question, however, is complicated by the nature of Trump's case, with misdemeanors being elevated to felonies.

Germain said he wondered whether the statute of limitations might apply to the underlying – and uncharged – crimes that made falsifying business records a felony.

"I could imagine a court saying that you can't put together two or three" misdemeanors that are beyond the statute of limitations and turn them into a felony that hasn't reached that time limit, he said.

He compared the case to "stacked Russian dolls," with charges that rely on an underlying crime, which itself relies on another underlying crime.

"That's why it's such a difficult case to understand," Germain said.

---

quote:

---

That happened in most jurisdictions.

---

You can't be serious.

quote:

---

The Covid stuff had nothing to do with Trump

---

Nah, they just used that and a host of other things like taking a Misdemeanor and making it felonies by saying it was used to mask another crime even though they never laid to bear what that crime was.

Totally didn't use this bullshite to get Trump.


Dumb fk

quote:

---

I'm curious what crimes they're alleging from 2020 aren't dead due to the SOL running last November

---

SOL doesn't mean shite anymore. We stopped caring about that fake bullshite when they went after Trump for shite that didn't happen decades ago.

quote:

---

We were with Branch and Noah Thomas. I’m also sure the GT guy and Williams aren’t cheap, but I get your point.

---

Hell, you have Alabama basketball playing former pro basketball players to win in college. The entire landscape of college sports is becoming laughable.

College sports at one time were get the best recruits you could get out of high school, develop them for 3 years and hopefully get the payoff from that development and now it's Free Agency on steroids. We already have players going to the NFL that transferred to a different team every season. I do agree we do fine in the current landscape, but our model entirely leans on high school recruiting while other teams' models have shifted to a spending model leaning more on the portal. Time will tell on which model ends up being the most successful, but it has brought some new faces into the spotlight at programs that have never won - because they have money.

We do get talented kids out of the portal and use it to help our roster but I do think Kirby prefers a certain type of kid which has led to a tough roster that can beat anyone but we have also shown some weaknesses the last few years that maybe could have been addressed in the portal but I also get that everyone in the country is also after those same kids to address weaknesses.

quote:

---

I do think UGA has a stronger NIL pool than the public perceives. Our roster is more expensive to retain than most, and retention doesn’t create headlines.

---

I don't think so - Maybe for a D1 program we have a decent NIL pool but if you compare us to the spenders - I would venture to say we probably don't even spend in the top 25 spenders and ill list why

We lose just as many kids as everyone else - So our retention doesn't seem to be some anomaly where we retain better than others and we also when you see where most of the talented transfers are going - It's the same teams in on almost all that are considered to be players with a huge NIL bid going on. We are never in those conversations.

We've also lost players that were starting for us - that I'm guessing were bought for more than we were willing to spend and went to teams like Mizzouri - etc - Former 5 stars at that.


We were probably the last team in the conference to build an actual nice indoor facility to the point - everyone else was hard recruiting against us for our lack of facilities - this went on for years before it was finally rectified. That says to me - we can be quite the penny pinchers and not as serious about our sports as some other programs. There are teams out there that would have their coach's wife bang a recruit if it meant landing them and then there are programs like ours that don't want to play the game as much as others. Coach Smart has talked that they prefer to retain kids over taking transfers and I would venture to say those kids would come discounted over spending on what an open market player at that same position would cost.

Just an opinion - could be wrong


:cheers: