- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why would Maricopa County have a Republican voter heat map on the wall?
Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:06 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:06 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.
tru dat - this is iron-clad evidence of 'gasp' partisan planning going on within the very guts of the 'free and fair' election administrators.
At least there should be some 'explanation' of its presence.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:25 am to burger bearcat
quote:link?
This was already confirmed not a Democrat map.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 4:27 am to lsunurse
quote:He said "confirmed"
Proof?
So, obviously it's true
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:09 am to burger bearcat
I agree this is pretty strange, but it does look like a Dem heat map next to it. It is the same map but blue.
With that said, it is really unnecessary to have both. Just collect the votes and don't worry about what precincts you have left and what demo or party dominates that precinct.
With that said, it is really unnecessary to have both. Just collect the votes and don't worry about what precincts you have left and what demo or party dominates that precinct.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:44 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
least there should be some 'explanation' of its presence.
read the full thread.
there is.
and early in thread someone correctly states that there is a democrat map too.
but a poster immediately MISTAKENLY states that there is no democrat map.
possible honest mistake but more likely to be of the same cloth as those who originated this "story" whose intention is to rile up and is intentional because so easy to find the factual full story. so did the one who mistakenly claims no democrat map believe that or was that more of intentional riling up?
So the thread goes on, until someone clips in the facts, which you didn't read.
This post was edited on 12/15/22 at 6:54 am
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:49 am to CelticDog
quote:das macht nichts
and early in thread someone correctly states that there is a democrat map too.
quote:
What difference should partisan density make? How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning? I can understand general voter density being useful.
...the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 6:56 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
das macht nichts
brushes aside the grievances of the entire claim of thread.
of course it matters.
read my reply to Chinese bandit 58.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:03 am to CelticDog
quote:How?
of course it matters.
How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning?
Again, the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:32 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
What difference should partisan density make? How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning? I can understand general voter density being useful. But that's bizarre, and the fact they've got both Dem and GOP maps doesn't make it any less odd and questionable.
Bingo.
If it is about access during Election Day overall voting density is all that would matter. That’s a bogus excuse.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:39 am to CelticDog
quote:
but a poster immediately MISTAKENLY states that there is no democrat map.
Let's set the semantics aside on this one. And say there was also a Democrat map.
You still have not articulated why a "non-partisan" government voting center would require partisan heat maps?
I'm not even alleging anything specific. The only information any of us know is that the maps do exist and they were in the government voting centers. Again, why?
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:39 am to burger bearcat
To call the election.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:41 am to burger bearcat
That looks a great deal like the map that we spent 10 pages discussing three weeks ago.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:44 am to David_DJS
quote:
Honest question - what does it matter?
You send bunk machines to those areas.
You make sure they don’t go to others.
Stop being so fricking naive.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:45 am to lsunurse
quote:
Proof?
Proof it’s a democrat map?
Prof the vaccines are 100% safe and effective?
Posted on 12/15/22 at 7:47 am to dgnx6
quote:What is a “bunk machine?”
You send bunk machines to those areas.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:24 am to burger bearcat
quote:
You still have not articulated why a "non-partisan" government voting center would require partisan heat maps?
This is all that matters. Dems should be equally pissed a republican controlled Maricopa BOS allowed maps of Dem areas in there, if that’s what they are.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 8:36 am to lsunurse
I would like to see the maps super imposed. It looks like "hot" area over lap.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 9:09 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
What difference should partisan density make? How would knowing a precinct was heavily blue or red affect planning? I can understand general voter density being useful.
If I was blissfully unaware of the most recent accusations of frickery, I would speculate that a fairness minded organization would make an effort to know partisan density as a subcategory of overall voter density simply to be hyper-sensitive to possible accusations of frickery to minimize the possibility of partisan regions making credible claims of neglect for their region.
I do this in my current job. There are regions that are more prone to “because we’re black” reasoning. Ignoring their group representation is perceived as neglect even when overall numbers might drive a different strategy.
Belief is a stubborn thing.
Posted on 12/15/22 at 9:16 am to David_DJS
quote:
nobody has explained how any of these three maps could be used to promote fraud.
shocking. blobs.
Popular
Back to top


1







