- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why we should be behind the Ketanji Brown USSC nomination
Posted on 3/18/22 at 2:57 pm to andouille
Posted on 3/18/22 at 2:57 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important and she can bring an insight into decisions that none of the other justices have.
What does this have to do with the LAW? I could give a crap what her life experiences are. How does she interpret the LAW?
2
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:00 pm to andouille
quote:
As a staunch conservative
I don't think you know what this means.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:03 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important and she can bring an insight into decisions that none of the other justices have. That insight deserves to be heard and considered.
As a staunch conservative I believe in fairness, this is fair.
You are either a troll, or an idiot. I lean toward the former.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:03 pm to andouille
This has to be a troll.......
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:04 pm to Lg
quote:
What does this have to do with the LAW? I could give a crap what her life experiences are. How does she interpret the LAW?
This. If the answer includes racial, gender, or other demographic considerations, I do not support her nomination.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:05 pm to andouille
quote:
As a staunch conservative
Well, here is your mistake. The only people who use the adjective 'staunch' in front of the word 'conservative'.... are leftists.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:05 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
What's her stance on sentencing for sex crimes and mandatory minimums for child porn and sex offenders? I will hang up and listen
Dems almost 100% don’t view pedophiles in a negative light.
The OP isn’t a conservative. That was a lie. Once you realize that you can easily figure out why the OP is behind Brown.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:09 pm to andouille
There are better people. She may be, in your opinion, the best black female SCOTUS appointee, but she isnt the best person overall for the job.
Even Democrats could have done better by nominating other qualified judges. Dont try and justify a bad pick.
Even Democrats could have done better by nominating other qualified judges. Dont try and justify a bad pick.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:10 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important and she can bring an insight into decisions that none of the other justices have.
Is her race and sex the most important determinant of her point fo view?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:11 pm to andouille
so can we say the next appointment will be a white male?
then, find the most qualified one.
that's fair, right??
then, find the most qualified one.
that's fair, right??
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:11 pm to andouille
The fact that she’s been reversed more than average is enough for me to not want her anywhere near a court making decisions from which there is no appeal.
I am not behind her on principle.
I am not behind her on principle.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:12 pm to andouille
quote:
she qualified, is she the most qualified? I doubt it but that is besides the point.
And this is the reasoning that gets you Joe Biden in the Oval Office. And Kamala Harris giving us 2nd grade geography lessons about the location of Ukraine and Russia.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:14 pm to andouille
Why don’t we just put a homeless crackhead on the bench. He has a unique worldview that he can bring to the table.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:14 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important and she can bring an insight into decisions that none of the other justices have. That insight deserves to be heard and considered.
Ah so you're one of those "living, breathing document" cocksuckers. Good to know that I need never take you seriously.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:15 pm to andouille
I loved it when Tucker Carlson started talking about her LSATs. Although he didn't say it, the implication was clear -- was she even qualified to get into Harvard or was she just another Affirmative Action poster child.
Her biggest "claim to fame" is that she was on Harvard Law Review. Well, we also know that the Harvard Law Review also uses an Affirmative Action plan and sets a quota for its members. It's interesting that Harvard boasts about these AA program but then you're not allowed to scrutinize anyone who MAY HAVE taken advantage of it. So, did she deserve that accolade? Let's see her grades.
If the left is going tout these accolades, then they deserve to be examined.
It appears as though this woman MAY have been the benefactor or Affirmative Action to get EVERY F*CKING POSITION she has ever gotten (we KNOW FOR A F*CKING FACT that her nomination was guided by a RACIST Affirmative Action process). If this is the case, doesn't she have a conflict of interest in ruling on the upcoming Affirmative Action cases that will be before the Court?
In any event, Congress has a DUTY to explore these issues.
Her biggest "claim to fame" is that she was on Harvard Law Review. Well, we also know that the Harvard Law Review also uses an Affirmative Action plan and sets a quota for its members. It's interesting that Harvard boasts about these AA program but then you're not allowed to scrutinize anyone who MAY HAVE taken advantage of it. So, did she deserve that accolade? Let's see her grades.
If the left is going tout these accolades, then they deserve to be examined.
It appears as though this woman MAY have been the benefactor or Affirmative Action to get EVERY F*CKING POSITION she has ever gotten (we KNOW FOR A F*CKING FACT that her nomination was guided by a RACIST Affirmative Action process). If this is the case, doesn't she have a conflict of interest in ruling on the upcoming Affirmative Action cases that will be before the Court?
In any event, Congress has a DUTY to explore these issues.
This post was edited on 3/18/22 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:16 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman
Then she should be in the legislature crafting laws that are independent on the color of one's skin or the type junk between their legs.
What we need is a "Words mean what they meant when they were coined - anytime you have an new slant then you need a new word" law.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:17 pm to andouille
So she brings that “black women perspective”? It’s amazing how liberals think the entirety of a person can be defined by race and sex.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:17 pm to andouille
quote:
As a black woman her point of view is important
Lmao! Who is it important to, and why??
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:18 pm to andouille
With the passing of the Crown Act we have no choice but to accept her
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:18 pm to GoldenGuy
quote:
There are thousands of qualified black women in the world, and Ketanji was chosen?
I mean, honestly, are there though?
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News