Started By
Message

Why did Bush lose in 92?

Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:14 am
Posted by tigahfan747
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2017
1608 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:14 am
Was it really because of Ross Perot?
Posted by Midget Death Squad
Meme Magic
Member since Oct 2008
24544 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:15 am to
Yes
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115738 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:15 am to
Ross Perot

No new taxes flub (that wasn't really his fault)
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95368 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:16 am to
Perot did a lot of damage but Bush ran the most passive incumbent campaign ever, likely because he’d had 90% approval in 1991.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47604 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:16 am to
Perot was a factor, but ""Read my lips" did a whole lot more damage to Bush while simultaneously elevating Perot
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
3815 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:17 am to
Wasn't there a mild recession as well?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95368 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Wasn't there a mild recession as well?


It skirted the definition of “recession” but was treated as major because it was the first time the economy had slowed since Reagan’s first term.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19045 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:18 am to
Because he literally didn’t campaign until it was too late. He was seen as a shoe in for a second term and got lazy. Bill Clinton became the nominee because no other Dem wanted to take on a guy who at one point had a 90 point approval rating. By the time he realized Billy was a serious threat plus the addition of Perot there was nothing he could do
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115738 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:19 am to
Yes.

Clinton also got 3% in Iowa, lost NH, won only one state on Super Tuesday (GA), and didn't emerge as THE guy until late in the primary process.

I don't think Bush took him as seriously as he should have because of his approval rating and how little Clinton was known, and because of all of Clinton's possible scandals
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:20 am to
Yes.

He cut the Rep vote in half. I rememeber it well.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62773 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:20 am to
Probably one of the first times the TV media realized they had influence over elections
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18637 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:20 am to
It the economy stupid.

Yes Perot hurt him, yes “read my lips” hurt him, but the economy had slowed and the Fed wasn’t as political then as now.

Also, it turns out that country bumpkin governor from Arkansas was a damn good campaigner.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118761 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:20 am to
quote:

No new taxes flub (that wasn't really his fault)


Can you explain why?
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15305 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:21 am to
Why didnt the superior candidate, for the people, Perot win in 92? Because the ineffective Bush was too selfish to step a side and he had the backing of all the ruling class.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14491 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:24 am to
A lot of reasons most of which are mentioned below:

-mild recession
-"no new taxes" pledge
-He wasn't the most charismatic guy
-Bill, scandalous as he was, is very charismatic

Plus, it was essentially 12 years of the same administration. Fatigue sets in.

But at the end of the day, it was Ross Perot. Screw him.
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Can you explain why?


It's the intro to Living Color's "Cult of Personality.

"No new Taxes! Read my lips! NO! NEW! TAXES!!"

Then the Democrats tricked him into a compromise on raising taxes.
Once the election came around, the Dems blasted him lying about "no new taxes" over and over and over.

Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11154 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:25 am to
In hindsight, Perot wouldve probably been better than every president between Reagan and Trump.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64332 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Bush ran the most passive incumbent campaign ever


This!

He did not start really trying until just weeks before the election. He completely left bubba alone. It was crazy. I can only believe his handlers liked giving him bad advice.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105407 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Was it really because of Ross Perot?


Without a doubt. Did you see the amount of votes he got?

18.9% of the votes to Perot.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72620 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:27 am to
READ MY LIPS NO NEW TAXES

and perot
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram