- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who has jurisdiction to prosecute this border patrol agent?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:45 pm to the808bass
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:45 pm to the808bass
quote:
No. I’m making a rather clear point that if a law enforcement officer breaks a law while on the clock that they can be prosecuted for it.
yes by the federal government, see how that works jethro?
there's an ATF agent in little rock that just more or less executed our cheif executive of the clinton national airport in a predawn raid on his home in a suspected gun show violation.
bryan malinowski in an effort by your BFF joe biden's desire to create a fast and furious situation for gun shows.
here child educate yourself!
LINK
5
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:55 pm to dickkellog
quote:meh
see how that works jethro?
but your random jethrine reference made me LOL
Posted on 1/24/26 at 10:52 pm to dickkellog
Unacceptable! Sad! Infuriating! Incompetent! Pure lack of humanity, common sense or compassion.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 12:10 am to loogaroo
State. Homicide is a state investigation
Posted on 1/25/26 at 12:15 am to loogaroo
Feds.
And Trump should preemptively pardon every ICE and Border Patrol Agent before he leaves office out of an abundance of caution, IMO.
And Trump should preemptively pardon every ICE and Border Patrol Agent before he leaves office out of an abundance of caution, IMO.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 12:21 am to prplhze2000
The State can prosecute but the defendant can have it removed to federal court where immunity would be determined.
Could you imagine trying to enforce federal law in Mississippi and Alabama, etc in the late 50s/60s if States could essentially veto federal law through proaecuting federal agents in state courts?
Could you imagine trying to enforce federal law in Mississippi and Alabama, etc in the late 50s/60s if States could essentially veto federal law through proaecuting federal agents in state courts?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 12:34 am to loogaroo
You're talking about the supremacy clause. We went to war once over this.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 1:46 am to paulb52
Yet
Posted on 1/25/26 at 3:31 am to dickkellog
quote:
After the shooting, the Arkansas State Police conducted an investigation. In April, state police turned over the case file to Jones, the prosecutor for Pulaski County, to make a determination about whether the shooting was justified.
LINK
You ignorant slut.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:21 am to dickkellog
quote:
yes jethrine, if on duty that is correct it would be up to the federal government to prosecute that agent.
No. The agent has to be performing their duties lawfully.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:25 am to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
The state can prosecute a federal agent.
Everyone downvoting you apparently think that the Republicans will hold the Whte House forever.
There is no statute of limitations for murder. As soon as the next Democrat is sworn in as POTUS, not only will Minnesota get the green light to prosecute him, there will also be federal civil rights charges brought.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 6:34 am
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:27 am to dickkellog
quote:
there's an ATF agent in little rock that just more or less executed our cheif executive of the clinton national airport in a predawn raid on his home in a suspected gun show violation.
You're being incredibly dishonest, as is your article. That guy was caught dead to rights breaking the law, and it was prior to the regs the article references.
The ATF could have handled that situation better, for sure, but nothing they did was unlawful.
However, within your own article is a clue.
quote:
The Arkansas State Police were notified about the officer-involved shooting and responded to the Malinowski home to conduct their investigation.
quote:
Additionally, the Arkansas State Police obtained a search warrant for the home as part of their officer-involved shooting investigation. The State Police did not turn over the Malinowski home to the ATF and RAC Merrill until 1:53 p.m. on March 19, 2024.
Why would state, not federal, police investigate this incident if only the feds can so do?
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 6:29 am
Posted on 1/25/26 at 6:28 am to Riverside
quote:
And Trump should preemptively pardon every ICE and Border Patrol Agent before he leaves office out of an abundance of caution, IMO.
No POTUS can pardon anyone for state or local crimes.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 6:29 am
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:14 am to the808bass
....ok, defacto complete immunity. FBI is not going to investigate what ICE does. DoJ isn't going to review right now in any meaningful way. We won't know which officer discharged his weapon.
ICE and Homeland won't really investigate either.
They are free to do pretty much whatever they want right now.
ICE and Homeland won't really investigate either.
They are free to do pretty much whatever they want right now.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:28 am to dickkellog
quote:ing
yes jethrine, if on duty that is correct it would be up to the federal government to prosecute that agent. i'm assuming they would.
Driving drunk is not part of any official duty.
I would think the agent would be prosecuted by the state
I would think the feds would prosecute him for being drunk while 'on duty.'
quote:
it always amazing to me how stupid you people are.
and you have proved it in a most hilarious manner - making fun of one of the most respected members of this board.
sucks to be you
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:30 am to KiwiHead
quote:
We won't know which officer discharged his weapon.
THAT is actually the subplot I am most interested in watching develop.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:30 am to loogaroo
The State of Minnesota and the Feds.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:31 am to SelaTiger
quote:
Not for on the job incidents.
If he’s found to have acted beyond the scope of his duties, which is what the state will argue, yes they can.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. The agent has to be performing their duties lawfully.
Which the agents clearly were
Lawfully.
Gross negligence would likely be the standard
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News