- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What happens to our system after this, is this what we want,you want Dems with this power?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:04 pm to BugAC
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:04 pm to BugAC
quote:
No. Alawieh was neither a citizen nor a goo muslim. She was a terrorist sympathizer with connections to Hezbollah. What sort of right do you think someone with work visas have? They are here at the discretion of the Federal Government. Not at the discretion of MSNBC or some leftist university or politician. Their visa can be cancelled at any time for any reason. I'd think being linked to terrorist cells is a good enough reason for the fedgov to deport. Let me ask you this, if you went to Iran and shouted "death to Iran", what would happen to you? If you went to China, and started organizing protests against Xi Jinping, what would happen to you? Or, if you think those 2 countries are extreme examples, if you went to England, as a US Citizen, and typed on facebook "British parliament is protecting pedophiles", what would happen? We are literally the most "tolerant" country in the world in regards to free speech. If she was an actual citizen she would not be deported and you can't link a single case where any American citizen is being deported for similar infractions. But, she is not a legal citizen, she IS connected to Hezbollah, and she has organized protests in favor of the terrorist organization. She earned her deportation.
I can't find a word in your post to disagree with.
It also has absolutely nothing to do with the point I made.
0
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:05 pm to Eurocat
Blessed? lol. You progressives love to mock Christianity.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:06 pm to Bunk Moreland
Are We living in different universes? Hasn’t that already happened regarding J6 when the Dems were in control?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:07 pm to Eurocat
The courts were not meant to be expanded and used as a partisan interference scheme when the other branches were not to a particular party's liking. The scope and scale of the courts needs to be reviewed as well as their ability to stall indefinitely any executive action at will. I'm ok with Trump pushing it. Let it go to the supremes and see where it lands.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:07 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
I don't know about this situation, but this was my and boosie's point in one of the threads about the Columbia guy. Be careful, because that terrorism label will get turned on you for speech or a cause you support, like J6.
And exactly what country will "J6" be deported to? She IS NOT a US citizen. She is not afforded all rights guaranteed to citizens. Why are you pretending this is apples to apples? There has not be 1 single, solitary United States citizen deported for similar actions. Therefore, your equivocation is stupid.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:07 pm to Eurocat
Eat shite.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:08 pm to AUCom96
quote:
\The courts were not meant to be expanded and used as a partisan interference scheme when the other branches were not to a particular party's liking. The scope and scale of the courts needs to be reviewed as well as their ability to stall indefinitely any executive action at will. I'm ok with Trump pushing it. Let it go to the supremes and see where it lands.
Fine, but until then Trump should have held in place activities, because right now he is literally not doing what the courts have said should be done.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:09 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Eurocat
Your ability to both process and interpret information is significantly flawed. The Dems are obviously using these rogue judges to keep President Trump from carrying out his legal duties.
You're anti-Trump, so you're clearly okay with this bullshite.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:09 pm to Eurocat
quote:Nice try, but wrong.
That has been their job since Marburry vs Madison over 200 years ago.
In Marbury vs. Madison the issue was Congress could not pass unconstitutional laws.
It had nothing to do with the POTUS enforcing longtime laws on the books.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:10 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Trump is basically saying to the judiciary f**k you.
If the leftist weren't so busy throwing out BS rulings we would not be in this position in our country.
But, here we are and Trump needs to force some resolution to all of this. I commend him for doing whatever it takes to get the focus of the nation on these corrupt judges.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:12 pm to Eurocat
The Dems have proven that there no limits to what they'll do. This is the last chance we'll have to save the Republic and restore the rule of law.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:13 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Concerns have also been raised in other cases about whether the Trump administration is complying with court rulings blocking parts of its agenda.
If a judge makes an unconstitutional ruling, must we all follow it just because "but judge says"? These trash "judges" are 100% political appointees and their "rulings" are nothing more than obstruction that are 100% unconstitutional. The Trump DOJ knows this. Therefore, why abide by a ruling that is unconstitutional? That is the difference between Biden and Trump. Biden's actions were unconstitutional, and everyone knew it. They were squashed by judges cited with constructional backing and Biden's rulings (free college for all) were rightly struck down. This is some Obama asshat with no legal argument. It's just "Trump bad".
And finally, i think the last 4+ years should have fixed most people from the "well we shouldn't do this because Democrats might do that". Democrats did all sorts of reckless shite over the past half decade without the benefit of "Republicans did it first". I think the time for spiting ourselves is over now, don't you think?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:13 pm to KCT
quote:
Your ability to both process and interpret information is significantly flawed. The Dems are obviously using these rogue judges to keep President Trump from carrying out his legal duties. You're anti-Trump, so you're clearly okay with this bullshite.
This has been this way in America since Marbury vs Madison.
Tell me why you can't flip it around and say "rogue conservative judges were keeping Biden from carrying out his legal duties".
This has been the way in America since 1802.
For example -
LINK
LINK /
LINK /
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:20 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Why do all you lefties love gangs and terrorist so much
They need somebody to do their dirty work.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:21 pm to Eurocat
Dont want to get deported and your visa cancelled? Don’t be a terrorist loving idiot.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:22 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Fine, but until then Trump should have held in place activities, because right now he is literally not doing what the courts have said should be done.
Why hasn't the judge stated unilaterally, no deportations are allowed to happen? Because it's not of his purview.
Why hasn't the judge named in the order, the specific criminals by name and stated the reason why, individually, they can not be deported? Because it's not in his purview.
So if the judge isn't making a ruling on all deportations because he knows it will fail, and if he's not ruling on the individuals and their crimes, because he knows that too will fail, then making a ruling on this particular flight while it is in mid air over another territory (not US soil) will also fail.
There is literally no standing in US law that backs this judge. But we should abide by his ruling, why? Because the MSM and the left says so and is desperate for a win? The Democrat party is dead, and people like you killed it. You should have been smarter.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:25 pm to Eurocat
Why is it that the judges who do this are usually appointed by democrats?
You're worried about the Dems doing this? They have already politically spoiled the situation with this judge shopping.
You're worried about the Dems doing this? They have already politically spoiled the situation with this judge shopping.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:25 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Dems with this power
Been a coma the last four years?
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:27 pm to Eurocat
quote:
I don't like this.
The good thing is, you folks aren't looked at as reasonable, sensible people.
IOW, frick off.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News