re: What Crime did Tulsi accuse Obama of committing?

quote:

---

At the end of this trail of manufactured evidence, we will inevitably end up at the Robert Mueller investigation.

The continuum of the Trump-Russia narrative starts with Hillary Clinton (Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie), then transfers to the FBI (James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok), which includes the DOJ National Security Division (AG Lynch, DAG Yates, Mary McCord), then goes through the backdoor to Barack Obama (Susan Rice, Lisa Monaco) and the Legislative Branch (SSCI), and eventually elevates with DNI James Clapper and CIA Director John Brennan manufacturing the 2017 intelligence product.

All of that collective effort, all of the former created inputs, eventually culminates with the Robert Mueller Special Counsel (Andrew Weissmann) and the Lawfare ideologues charged with upholding the manufactured premise. In my opinion, the greatest legal exposure is going to be with the Mueller team, because that group intentionally and purposefully knew the information being received was fraudulent – yet they used it anyway.

---

quote:

---

The man hasn’t been president for almost 9 years now and he still owns a huge piece or real estate in the MAGA brain.

---

You're underselling the work the man put in to divide America like it hasn't been since before the Civil Rights movement.

Oh. And Helping sell off SAP technologies. Financing ISIS via cash to Iran/Muslim brotherhood. Selling US uranium reserves to Russia.

quote:

---

Yeah it really won’t. The man hasn’t been president for almost 9 years now and he still owns a huge piece of real estate in the MAGA brain.

---

Obama is an America-hating, race-baiting community AGITATOR, but the the only thing that matters to you is that he's (half) black.

Maybe you should cut your dick off and join the WNBA. Your perpetual race-baiting would fit right in with those racist lesbians

quote:

---

Treason

---

I dont think this board has a high opinion of Andrew McCarthy or the National Review but he literally wrote the book on Russia Russia Russia and he pretty much sums up why this criminal referral will go no where.


National Review article.
LINK

quote:

---

Putting aside that Obama’s insidious actions were not crimes, that he was not charged by Durham after a four-year investigation, and that any possibility of indicting him for 2016–17 actions lapsed under the five-year statute of limitations years ago, does Gabbard disagree with Trump that former presidents must have immunity from prosecution?

More to the point, does Trump disagree with Trump?

---

According to Howard Kunstler

quote:

---

It may not add up to treason per se, but there are plenty of other serious charges generally proceeding from deprivation of rights under color of law (18 U.S.C. § 242), to seditious conspiracy, i.e., overthrow of the president (18 U.S.C. § 2384) to stuff a number of former officials into orange jumpsuits behind bars.

---

quote:

---

The Covid-19 op was the coup de grâce for the Left’s mental health — while it was also a silver bullet to get rid of Mr. Trump in the 2020 election. There is even reason to believe that the mRNA vaccines, with their spike protein payloads, delivered physical brain injury by way of induced vascular disorder. Millions who took them may never recover their senses — but so far that is just hypothesis.

---

LINK

quote:

---

I loathe Obama. I think he's a communist. I think he deliberately divided the country so that he could bring in Marxism, and that he's too faux of an intellectual even to understand that he is a Marxist. He just thinks he's better than you and me. He's contemptible - and likely a criminal - but was Russia, Russia, Russia a crime?

---

Lemme guess. You voted for Trump three times, BUT …..

quote:

---

Obama needs to be in cuffs

---

How is he not immune, is the question, within your hypo.

quote:

---

And Helping sell off SAP technologies. Financing ISIS via cash to Iran/Muslim brotherhood. Selling US uranium reserves to Russia.

---

Which of these don't fall under his core Constitutional functions, ultimately?

I agree - I do not think there will be a crime that they can convict him of - I hope there is something somewhere that will bring him in front of a judge. Possibly sedition.

I've concluded the most we can hope for is taking away his status - and hopefully could even take away some of his benefits.

I am reconciled that we'll have to settle for some mid level asshats with a provable crime. Somewhere they had to have at least committed malfeasance in applying their authority. We will probably need whistle-blowers to even get that far.

I just hope that we can saddle the news media with enough evidence of malfeasance to take away some broadcast licenses = and perhaps incorporate some reasonable truth in broadcasting measures.