re: WAFB Pushing for Davis

Davis is going to win in a landslide. The blacks have rallied and have brought in the white liberals

Letlow has no chance. Add in the low conservative showing at the polls, this is over

quote:

---

Of course, we have "Republicans" that are sitting this one out because of an accent or that they "want to vote out Davis" in 6 years.

---

I'll be voting for Letlow begrudgingly, but let's not act like the lack of enthusiasm for her is unwarranted or unfair. She is a garbage candidate who reeks of career opportunism. Frankly I find it embarrassing that LA couldn't produce a better Republican candidate but the local political machine did what the local political machine does. They certainly had no qualms with burying any party challengers to Letlow.

Davis is awful and maybe he wouldn't be as much of a threat if Letlow was a capable, principled candidate who could get out there and bury the leftist narratives and bullshite he spews with her own clear ideas and convictions, but she is a garbage candidate so she doesn't.

Davis is a dem dummy and will vote as he's told and it won't be in the favor of the voters.

quote:

---

The most conservative person on that network is Greg Meriweather

---

frick that piece of shite.

quote:

---

No offense…but the “won’t debate” argument always makes me laugh

---

Well it didn't make me laugh during the primaries. I wanted to hear what these candidates had to say in their own words and wanted them to demonstrate competency so I could determine which Republican I thought best to meaningfully represent my interests and to defeat the Democrat. These aren't household names running for Senate where we all know everything there is to know and debates tell you nothing about the candidates. She didn't want to debate because she already had a Trump/Landry endorsement. She was selected and debating did not serve HER personal political interests. Not a good sign to the Republican voters that your leading candidate doesn't want you to hear much from her because maybe you might not like it much and decide you'd rather someone else.

Not debating leaves the door open to corrupt candidate appointments where we really have no idea who we are voting for, the party apparatus simply selects the candidates behind closed doors. Jamie Davis is not a good candidate. Any capable Republican should welcome debate with him. It's pathetic that she basically hides and gives hollow canned remarks . Based on how she sounded in her one debate showing with Fleming though I understand. She is a weak candidate who is obviously going to serve someone's interests in office. I guess our pittance is we'll get her voting with party interests if she wins. The flip side is that party interests may be just what John Thune wants. Or big donors. And she may fold on principles when the political winds sway and she needs to please other masters.

I can’t believe that Davis has any chance

quote:

---

Letlow has no chance. Add in the low conservative showing at the polls, this is over

---

Get on some of that Polymarket money, then, Bruh. Letlow's at 90% on there.

quote:

---

Also It's fricking hilarious how stupid replies are here. "I don't agree with you, you must work for....."

---

Far too many posters can't see they are the flip side of the coin from progressives saying Trump is literally Hitler.

quote:

---

She is a weak candidate who is obviously going to serve someone's interests in office

---

She will do whatever the gop overlords tell her to do. Davis will do whatever the DNC overlords tell him to do. Neither has any interest in what the people in the state want them to do, and neither will do any good for the state of Lousiana but whoever wins will be finacially secure for the rest of their lives, so what does it matter.