- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:43 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside."
The barns with the counter snipers had steeper sloping roofs than that building.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:44 am to IT_Dawg
The 2 snipers that were behind Trump on the barn were at a much greater slope. This bitch needs to resign or be fired immediately.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:46 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside," she said.
Just. Wow.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:46 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside."
The follow up should be:
Ok. So the decision was made to secure the building from the inside. You didn’t want to put someone in danger on a sloped roof. Fair. How did the shooter get up there if you had everything secure?
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:47 am to IT_Dawg
That's what happens when you let a count do a man's job.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:49 am to Pettifogger
quote:
The alternative that the USSS is scared to put snipers on a modestly sloped roof because someone could get a boo boo is the more horrific narrative
The horrific narrative to me is that she had three days to come up with something and that's where she landed.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:54 am to PuertoRicanBlaze
I am trying to not run with conspiracy theories...
but maybe she was involved and thinks saying something like that will keep her alive.
Because honestly, that's about the best I can come up with. If it's malice, then we could root out the bad actors and fix things.
If what she said is legitimate, the entire agency is fricked, we need to fire them all (and possibly put the upper level in prison), and run protection details from local PDs and/or military SF teams.
but maybe she was involved and thinks saying something like that will keep her alive.
Because honestly, that's about the best I can come up with. If it's malice, then we could root out the bad actors and fix things.
If what she said is legitimate, the entire agency is fricked, we need to fire them all (and possibly put the upper level in prison), and run protection details from local PDs and/or military SF teams.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:55 am to Flats
This is a gigantic scandal. How can that lady not be smart enough to come up with a better excuse than a sloped roof? JFC
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:55 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside."
Hell, handicap ramps have more slope than the roof the shooter was on.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 10:55 am to covtgr
Quote:
"figured this was some kind of 4chan BS until I heard the words directly from her mouth."
WHERE did you hear those words? I can't find a link. Thanks
"figured this was some kind of 4chan BS until I heard the words directly from her mouth."
WHERE did you hear those words? I can't find a link. Thanks
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:01 am to DingLeeBerry
in another question- is that a rangefinder on top of the scope?
I ask, because we saw that guy's head pop up off the scope briefly during the shooting.
Was he confirming range, to ensure his shot would be on target? We saw he WAS accurate, a clean headshot.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:04 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside."
When Trump wins. She gone.
Seriously, would any rational and sane person be complicit in the murder of another human being to keep their jobs?
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:04 am to IT_Dawg
That is by far one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard, much less for this specific event. That disqualifies her for ANY job in security. Definitely for the USSS.
Especially when there were snipers, who I'm convinced were not USSS, on that barn with 3x the pitch.
Now I want to know, it begs this question, is that something the field USSS team(s) fed back to leadership. If they did those personnel should be called out privately and publicly.
If it wasn't feedback from the field, they need to look real hard at charging her criminally because that is a blatant bullshite remark and belies intent. Make her say that shite under oath.
Especially when there were snipers, who I'm convinced were not USSS, on that barn with 3x the pitch.
Now I want to know, it begs this question, is that something the field USSS team(s) fed back to leadership. If they did those personnel should be called out privately and publicly.
If it wasn't feedback from the field, they need to look real hard at charging her criminally because that is a blatant bullshite remark and belies intent. Make her say that shite under oath.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:06 am to IT_Dawg
She should be fired on the spot right there for that explanation. WTF. That's complete bullshite.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:07 am to IT_Dawg
They must have some real tough training.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:13 am to Padme
And just for a couple hours at most? Yeah, this excuse is insane... and dishonest AF.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:13 am to TBoy@LSU
quote:
My goodness, there is barely any slope to that roof
so little that a dead body lubricated by his own blood didn't slide off.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:18 am to Nutriaitch
Four LEOs and a dead body on top of the roof in the aftermath. Nobody harnessed. Nobody in danger of falling.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 11:18 am to Earnest_P
quote:
And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof
Can you imagine all the DEI wannabe hardass female USSS leadership sitting around “collabing” on this decision while sipping lattes?
“This is the most prime spot for a sniper to target Trump.”
“Yes but that roof has a slope to it and it’s more than six feet from the ground - real hazard for our team’s safety.”
“Definitely don’t want to risk someone falling off that, might break a leg. Let’s put some folks IN the building. That’ll work for sure.”
“Done! What a day! When are we getting our nails done boss babe?!?!?”
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News