- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USSS Director on not securing the roof
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:03 am to IT_Dawg
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:03 am to IT_Dawg
Silly incompetent woke logic. All I can say to that silly assessment is that every single day we are reminded of the incompetence of this fake President and his advisors. I can only console myself with the knowledge there surely is a God, because had God not stepped in to touch the head of Donald Trump and turned his head ever so slightly the nation would have been plunged into absolute chaos. To which I say - Choices have consequences - bad choices have bad consequences.
1
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:04 am to IT_Dawg
Does this mean we can disband OSHA as a safety hazard
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:05 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof.
All building roofs have some slope on them. How does this dumb bitch think water runs off?
If I had to guess from looking at it, the pitch on that roof is about 1:12 (1” of slope per 12” of run). Even 2:12 would be shallow enough to put someone up on.
This may be the weakest excuse yet.
This post was edited on 7/16/24 at 9:08 am
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:06 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside."
Just from my own cursory construction experience, they could have easily called a scaffolding company to build a scaffold tower (that is level & not sloped for the babies in the SS), taller than the nearby buildings and used it as a watchtower.
Heck even a manlift or tall scissorlift next to the building would have given you a wide line of sight of the entire rooftop.
Her response should offend our intelligence. Does she really think this will blow over that easy?
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:06 am to IT_Dawg
A drone with a camera. I am calling BS on this. They wanted Trump dead.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:06 am to Proximo
quote:
It was USSS Dir. Kim Cheatle
This woman is clearly too stupid to be in this high of a position. She should be making sandwiches at Subway.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:07 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside."
Wasn't too dangerous for the countersnipers on the barn woth a steeper pitch?
GTFOH you lying mf...
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:07 am to IT_Dawg
Makes sense.
It's OSHA's fault.
It's OSHA's fault.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:08 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside
If there ever was a time to have protests and march on Washington it is to make sure this lunatic resigns.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:08 am to IT_Dawg
Spoken like a risk manager for a soda company.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:08 am to IT_Dawg
How’d that work out securing from the “inside”?
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:09 am to IT_Dawg
I worked roofing for a summer and I can assure you that isn’t even close to an unsafe pitch for someone to leverage.
If the mouthbreathing 20YO shooter could use it I’m pretty sure a trained sniper who lays in their own urine for days waiting for a shot with ants biting them could’ve been expected to make it work.
That answer is far, far worse than what I expected. In fact it’s unimaginably bad coming from the woman who presumably has all the information from the scene.
If the mouthbreathing 20YO shooter could use it I’m pretty sure a trained sniper who lays in their own urine for days waiting for a shot with ants biting them could’ve been expected to make it work.
That answer is far, far worse than what I expected. In fact it’s unimaginably bad coming from the woman who presumably has all the information from the scene.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:09 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside."
It probably sounded better in her head, before she said it.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:10 am to Demonbengal
If a punk puny dork could get up there she wants us to believe that snipers couldn't. Where was the $98 dollar drone that could have spotted the punk?
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:11 am to IT_Dawg
As someone who has designed and built hundreds of such buildings, that looks like a 2/12 pitch. Easily walked on, which you can see from the agents standing around the body.
Failure to secure is nothing short of a deliberate attempt to leave a vulnerable spot for someone to assassinate him from.
Failure to secure is nothing short of a deliberate attempt to leave a vulnerable spot for someone to assassinate him from.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:12 am to IT_Dawg
Well, after all these years terrorist and would-be assassins have found the Secret Service's Achilles heal...sloped roofs
Fortunately there aren't very many of those in the US
Fortunately there aren't very many of those in the US
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:12 am to IT_Dawg
quote:
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside.
I expect nothing less from the DEI (didn’t earn it) leader.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:15 am to Alt26
The more I hear and read the more this smells like it was an oversight done on purpose. They allowed this to happen plain and simple. No other scenario makes sense.
Posted on 7/16/24 at 9:16 am to IT_Dawg
Where have we heard this before?
So it was the roof (cold). And it was the slope (jet lag). So it was the two things, right.
- I’m a black lesbian
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News