- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:34 pm to Patato Salad
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:34 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
his filmed statement that he enjoys grabbing unwilling women by the pussy.
You are a liar. That is not what he said. He said there are women who would let you do it if you have enough money. Refute that dumbass.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:35 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
That is not what he said. He said there are women who would let you do it if you have enough money.
Correct. The entire point of that comment was about consent. He just made it in a crude manner.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:36 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
There's literally no evidence against Trump in this case.
TDS doesn't need any evidence!
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:37 pm to TBoy
Is that what you tell your defense clients?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:37 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
This is appalling. To think they'd let a jury verdict stand based on nothing more than the victim's testimony, the people she told, two other victims of similar incidents, Trump's failure to testify, his confusing the victim for his ex-wife despite claiming she was not his type, and his filmed statement that he enjoys grabbing unwilling women by the pussy.
None of this means shite. It's literally all hearsay.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:39 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
USSC Sides With E Jean Carroll
Nah.
They declined to even look at it, which is even more of a travesty considering how NY manipulated law to specifically invite the case. Roberts is a coward.
All the while knowing she lied about who funded her legal representation!
Put those things together and it's obvious for anyone with half a brain to see the entire case was a sham and put together only to "get Trump".
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:41 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
To think they'd let a jury verdict stand based on nothing more than the victim's testimony
Considering she previously admitted, during an interview, that the idea of being raped was a sexual fantasy of hers, her testamony should have held no water.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:41 pm to blueboy
This is only as to the federal defamation case. Not the sexual assault decision/award.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:44 pm to blueboy
SFP said Trump was convicted of rape in this case
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:46 pm to blueboy
Sue her for every thing she has and then some. Keep her in court for the rest of her life. If she can do it, so can he.
Tit for tat, babee!! Nip this kind of lawfare behavior in the bud, once and for all.
Tit for tat, babee!! Nip this kind of lawfare behavior in the bud, once and for all.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:50 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The dress she gave sworn testimony on didnt exist in the time frame she claims he raped her.
Her sworn testimony was that the incident she alleged occurred in 1996.
It’s still fricky that she told the jury, “This question, the when, the date, has been something I’ve constantly been trying to pin down.”
Something as traumatic as a rape is not something you forget or need more time to think about. You know exactly when and where it occurred.
Children on the other hand might not remember if it happened when they were young kids before they later learn it was wrong and criminal behavior. Adults absolutely know what criminal behavior is and don’t wait 20 years to pursue public justice.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:52 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
his filmed statement that he enjoys grabbing unwilling women by the pussy.
This quite literally doesn't exist. But you know this. You are just retarded.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:57 pm to Willie Stroker
It’s still fricky that she told the jury, “This question, the when, the date, has been something I’ve constantly been trying to pin down.”
What deaf ears this fell on apparently.
What deaf ears this fell on apparently.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:59 pm to blueboy
quote:
during the mid-1990s
Written this way because the crazy old bitch can’t even remember what year it happened.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:00 pm to TBoy
quote:
Pay the lady and get this behind you
TBoy
Checks out. You would know about putting things behind you.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:03 pm to TBoy
quote:NO!! Fight this injustice for all you are worth. AND frick OFF CUCK TBoy
Pay the lady and get this behind you.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:03 pm to TBoy
quote:
Pay the lady
You mean lying whore? This is the problem with you people. Your entire world is consumed with evil and lies.

Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:05 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
Her sworn testimony was that the incident she alleged occurred in 1996.
Is that accurate? My last review was that she couldn’t say what year it occurred.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:07 pm to blueboy
quote:
So, it's now legal to make up bullshite, have your leftist state legislators change the law just to make a suit possible, and win based on no real evidence from a woman who has repeatedly, unsuccessfully tried to sue rich, powerful men for 'raping' her.
No, it’s illegal to molest a women.
You don’t get to only agree with court cases and elections when they go your way.
Popular
Back to top


1











