- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/30/26 at 7:53 am to TBoy
Don’t pay her a dime. The liberal liar will die before you do.
Toby is as low as she is.
Toby is as low as she is.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 7:56 am to TBoy
quote:
Pay the lady and get this behind you.
Why didn't she sue the other men she's accused?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 7:59 am to Obtuse1
quote:
I have zero sympathy for anyone with poor enough judgment to hire Alina Habba to represent them in a case of this import.
The left will murder you and your family for sticking up for Trump.
They have tried to ruin the lives of anyone in Trump's circle.
And don't say this isn't a thing. Most of you took a jab to keep your jobs.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 7:59 am
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:00 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Were you the jury foreman? No way of knowing this.
The jury decided the case before they heard a single word of testimony.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:06 am to RFK
quote:I think even you understand what a kangaroo clown show all of that was.
Jury
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:14 am to RFK
quote:
Were you the jury foreman? No way of knowing this.
quote:
Adult Survivors Act: Passed in 2022, this law created a one-year window for victims of sexual assault to sue their abusers, bypassing standard statutes of limitations. This allowed E. Jean Carroll to successfully sue Donald Trump for civil battery and defamation in New York courts.
They did this to get Trump. No way they were going to let a jury frick up their plans.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:21 am to Obtuse1
quote:
I have zero sympathy for anyone with poor enough judgment to hire Alina Habba to represent them in a case of this import.
What did she screw up in her work efforts?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:48 am to VoxDawg
quote:
One who's reportedly accused 6 other men of having sexually assaulted her in the past.
Holy shite! I asked ChatGPT, and it’s true.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:52 am to blueboy
It would have helped if Trump took the stand in the trial. He literally presented no defense. None. That made an appeal much more difficult.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:02 am to prplhze2000
quote:
It would have helped if Trump took the stand in the trial. He literally presented no defense. None. That made an appeal much more difficult.
Yeah I was looking forward to the factual, blind-justice nightly news reporting of the President sitting in a witness chair on the stand.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:48 pm to Penrod
I've got no problem being wrong, but I'd never deliberately lie about something like that just to score cheap internet points.
IIRC, that juicy little detail was deemed inadmissible by the biased-arse judge and was prevented from being told to the jury because of its value as an obvious nuclear bomb to the face of her credibility.
IIRC, that juicy little detail was deemed inadmissible by the biased-arse judge and was prevented from being told to the jury because of its value as an obvious nuclear bomb to the face of her credibility.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 12:50 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
It would have helped if Trump took the stand in the trial. He literally presented no defense. None. That made an appeal much more difficult.
She can't tell you the year that the offense occurred. If she can't name a day/date on when the assault was alleged to have happened, then how could Trump prove where he was as an alibi?
Her case was deliberately vague to prevent the defendant from proving where he was, because clearly Donald Trump's schedule would dictate where/when he was at almost all times.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:00 pm to TBoy
quote:
lady
Posted on 6/30/26 at 1:48 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
IIRC, that juicy little detail was deemed inadmissible by the biased-arse judge and was prevented from being told to the jury because of its value as an obvious nuclear bomb to the face of her credibility.
It probably would not have mattered since the biased judge hand-selected the jury.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 2:46 pm to VoxDawg
Right. But when you don't present a defense, you waive a lot of issues or defenses for appeal.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 3:00 pm to prplhze2000
Not one of the President's lawyers, but I'd imagine that was a function of how spurious the allegations were felt to be.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:42 pm to TBoy
quote:
Pay the lady and get this behind you.
How about you FOAD?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:45 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Nah.
They declined to even look at it, which is even more of a travesty considering how NY manipulated law to specifically invite the case. Roberts is a coward.
I bet Roberts and ACB were with every liberal Justice in refusing to review the case.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 5:46 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
This is appalling. To think they'd let a jury verdict stand based on nothing more than the victim's testimony, the people she told, two other victims of similar incidents, Trump's failure to testify, his confusing the victim for his ex-wife despite claiming she was not his type, and his filmed statement that he enjoys grabbing unwilling women by the pussy.
Did you get those BS talking points from the completely unbiased legal "experts" on MSNBC?
Popular
Back to top


0






