- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: **UPDATED*Full (Redacted) MAL Raid Affidavit(PDF of Redaction Filing + Link to Doc)
Posted on 8/26/22 at 11:58 am to VoxDawg
Posted on 8/26/22 at 11:58 am to VoxDawg
Probable cause these days is just someone lying to get the DOJ to do what they want them to do,
Russian collusion?
It says it right here in the Steele Dossier!
Russian collusion?
It says it right here in the Steele Dossier!
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 11:59 am
0
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:01 pm to Pettifogger
quote:We may be both missing something. As that is how I take it. The memo to the memo of the affidavit was also redacted.
I'm not really keeping up with this much - but that's not an affidavit, redacted or otherwise. It's just a redacted brief about the redactions needed for the affidavit (so arguably it's worse )
unless I'm missing something here
the links were posted in Ya Ya Tittle's thread;we were in mid discussion and the thread was anchored and this one stickied.
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 12:03 pm
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:01 pm to VoxDawg
Is anyone really surprised?
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:02 pm to dgnx6
quote:
this is a big nothing burger.
What a load of shite.
Basically, the NARA librarian told FBI that Bad Oranges Man took some docs took some documents with him to MAL that he should have brought to NARA --------------------------------and although we have been communicating with him and BOM gave some back ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FBI agent with expertise in intelligence believes that BOM still has some documents are super-dooper Tippy Top Secret at MAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------in violation of a statute that doesn't apply to POTUS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------and we don't agree with his lawyer or Kash Patel that BOM declassified them.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ oh yeah, and CBS saw a moving van at MAL on Jan 18, 2021 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- we need to search every room at MAL where the BOM has access to------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:02 pm to VoxDawg
So only thing they kept was how leaving info available could hurt governments case and aid Trump. They knew to hide this information prior too
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:03 pm to PhDoogan
quote:
oh yeah, and CBS saw a moving van at MAL on Jan 18, 2021
I love all the cites to fricking news stories.
They even got Breitbart in there.
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:04 pm to VoxDawg
"IN THE INTEREST OF TRANSPARENCY"
Inflation Reduction Act
Affordable Healthcare Act
Patriot Act
Anybody see a trend?
Inflation Reduction Act
Affordable Healthcare Act
Patriot Act
Anybody see a trend?
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:05 pm to VoxDawg
This is the government saying "frick You" to the American people.
The portions that were not redacted contained no useful information.
It would be less insulting to release nothing at all.
The portions that were not redacted contained no useful information.
It would be less insulting to release nothing at all.
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:06 pm to tiger7166
I don't see anything in the affidavit that made this "raid" necessary. They did it because the boxes weren't stored properly?
What am I missing here that would have caused the immediate need for this raid?
What am I missing here that would have caused the immediate need for this raid?
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:06 pm to VoxDawg
Given the history of lies, cheating and rigging, it would not surprise me if the dems constructed the affidavit after they viewed the contents after the raid.
The dems are truly desperate and will stoop to anything to stop DJT.
The dems are truly desperate and will stoop to anything to stop DJT.
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:08 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
unless I'm missing something here
You aren't... that is the pleading/order...
However, it should prove to everyone that the FBI can find the right judge, make up whatever they wish on whoever they wish, and there is not a thing that you can do about it...
All in the name of national security and ongoing investigation...
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:09 pm to AnAmericanGirl
quote:
They did it because the boxes weren't stored properly?
The boxes WERE stored properly at the government’s request.
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:09 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I saw that also YA TIttle. Didn't they site a yahoo article or something to justify a FISA warrant during the campaign.
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:09 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Unfortunately, the good faith demonstrated by President Trump was not matched once the boxes arrived at NARA. Leaks followed. And, once DOJ got involved, the leaks continued.
So DOJ and FBI leaks ok. Trump's side leaking things, bad. Got it.
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:10 pm to The Pirate King
This is correct. After the first visit the FBI requested additional locks where the docs were stored.
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:10 pm to VoxDawg
RE: Jay Bratt (one of the document submitters)
That guy looks like a young Barr. Nephew maybe?
That guy looks like a young Barr. Nephew maybe?
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:12 pm to The Maj
quote:
the FBI can find the right judge, make up whatever they wish on whoever they wish, and there is not a thing that you can do about it...
Even one who had previously recused himself on Trump's civil RICO case...
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:13 pm to jp4lsu
It seems the inference by the FBI and DOJ is that Trump was withholding classified docs and didn’t send all of them back.
What is NOT explained is why those alleged documents were not retrieved by the government agents that reviewed them at MAL
What is NOT explained is why those alleged documents were not retrieved by the government agents that reviewed them at MAL
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:13 pm to PollyDawg
I’ll just leave this here
LINK
The case in question is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration and it involved an effort by the conservative watchdog to compel the Archives to forcibly seize hours of audio recordings that Clinton made during his presidency with historian Taylor Branch.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.
Hmmm ??
LINK
quote:
Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
The case in question is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration and it involved an effort by the conservative watchdog to compel the Archives to forcibly seize hours of audio recordings that Clinton made during his presidency with historian Taylor Branch.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.
Hmmm ??
Posted on 8/26/22 at 12:14 pm to jp4lsu
quote:
After the first visit the FBI requested additional locks where the docs were stored.
The MSM is deliberately leaving out the tiniest of details in their coverage: Mar-a-Lago has a SCIF.
Page 3 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News