Started By
Message

re: TSA Tipped Off ICE Agents Before Arrests at San Francisco Airport

Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:14 am to
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24872 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:14 am to
They weren't

And they broke the law being here.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
16086 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:18 am to
quote:

The good reason.......privacy issues

The privacy act of 1974 says that FedGov can share *any* information it has about you with other agencies, departments, etc., for "law enforcement purposes."

As some may be aware, Congress passes tens of thousands of pages of laws a year, and then you can tack on executive authority seceded by the legislature to executive agencies (EPA, etc.)

My CIPP/G was worthless as soon as I got the certification decades ago.
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
10360 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:37 am to
quote:

What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?


If they were flying back to Guatamala your comment would be acceptable, but they weren't.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37834 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Ms. Lopez-Jimenez, 41, a native of Guatemala, and her daughter, Wendy Godinez-Lopez, were flagged by T.S.A. officials on Friday when they showed up on a passenger list for a Sunday flight from San Francisco to Miami.


You have to be a real dumbass illegal alien to think it’s ok to fly around the US. Unlike voting you have to have an ID to fly.

quote:

She had no criminal history, though she entered the country illegally.


Entering the country illegally is in fact a criminal history.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59252 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:57 am to
quote:

What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?


She wasn't leaving the US, but she is now.
Posted by FearlessFreep
Baja Alabama
Member since Nov 2009
19993 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:11 am to
quote:

She had no criminal history, though she entered the country illegally.
the bigger question for me is, how were she and her daughter (no age given) supporting themselves?

if either of them were employed, did they have a valid SS#? were they filing state and Federal income taxes?

also, since both were required to show Real IDs at the airport, what documentation did they provide to the state (presumably California) to obtain them?
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
7920 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:48 am to
We need to change the rules so I can upvote more than once! This is what I voted for.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22601 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:51 am to
quote:

agree with the incarceration part, but Marxist Dem supporters will never view it this way

Ain't that some tough shite. They'll have time reflect in prison
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88184 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Democratic officials recoiled this week at the detention.


Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104010 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:00 am to
It is low hanging fruit being taken care of.


If someone is a know illegal who has already been ordered out, picking them up when they fly is basically a low effort fix to the problem.

What are they going to do otherwise? Take Greyhound?
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17614 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:02 am to
quote:

What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?


Yeah, they were probably planning to catch the ferry to guatamala in Miami.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
38347 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:11 am to
Imagine thinking you are so brave and a champion of humanity to lie and be dishonest about illegals entering your country and siphoning off your tax dollars

I will never understand that line of thinking
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55529 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:29 am to
quote:

the bigger question for me is, how were she and her daughter (no age given) supporting themselves?

And were they receiving government aid?
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157776 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 10:54 am to
I would like our progressive friends to answer this.

If I move to Spain because I believe my life will be better and overstay my VISA, should I be upset for being deported once discovered?


Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13613 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:11 am to
quote:


What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?


Someone leaving on their own? You mean, illegals living here illegally and just traveling around within and into / out of the country as they please with no impedements? What's the benefit of nabbing them?

Making sure they don't continue to live here and take advantage of rights of American citizens while being criminal non-citizens who are here illegally. Letting them know their illegal actions have consequences and they're not free to do whatever they please and ignore our nation's laws. For starters.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13613 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:12 am to
quote:


quote:
What is the benefit of nabbing someone leaving on their own?


She was going to Miami... now she's going to Guatemala.

Also, this way, she has the official express DISinvitation to come back.

Or maybe admin47 wanted two more scalps on the official scoreboard.

Who cares? Two more gone.



Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
37988 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Democratic officials recoiled this week at the detention. Mr. Garamendi, a Democrat, said that it was the latest example of how the Trump administration was rounding up mothers and children instead of focusing its immigration enforcement on dangerous criminals.

I'm sorry, but I'm not moving the goalposts on this one. I voted for Trump to deport illegal immigrants.

ALL illegal immigrants. I don't care if they follow the law after they came here. Their being here, without having gone through the legal process, is a criminal felony violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325, and the democrats fighting to keep them here are blatantly guilty of criminal violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324.

Deport them all, criminal politicians included.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13613 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:


quote:
She had no criminal history, though she entered the country illegally.




How can someone write this sentence?



I can understand saying no history of violent crime but this? Pure propaganda


"In this house, no person is 'Illegal' (on stolen land)."
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
13613 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Seems like it was done calmly and humanely.


Implying that ICE is just running around, aside from this one case, and acting wrecklessly and inhumanely.

Such bullshite.
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
3461 posts
Posted on 3/25/26 at 12:08 pm to
Even if they were leaving on their own volition, they'd still need to be processed and tagged with being here illegally. They might also receive some type of credit or benefit for returning on their own.

Why can't people follow the rules? That is if they were returning to Guatemala on their own, which they weren't.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram