- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump not interested in reducing Housing Prices
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:39 pm to NIH
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:39 pm to NIH
quote:Are several things listed. Are you talking about any one in particular or all of them? Not sure what "that" is.
Why do you attribute that to Trump?
You don't like Trump. That's fine. I do like him. My guess is you have chronic case of TDS.
By the same token, why do you not give President Trump credit for things being better?
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:44 pm to scottydoesntknow
Then build them. Nobody is stopping you.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
housing is this sacred cow where we can't question bad decision making and pretend irrational appreciation is efficient.
What is the correct rate of price appreciation in housing market? What makes the current trend irrational?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:47 pm to Arkaea79
interest rates to come down more first.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:48 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
The only ones up in arms about prices going down are old people who have tons of equity(that they did nothing to earn in the first place)
There are more non-boomer homeowners than boomer homeowners.
And the notion that a homeowner doesn't earn the equity in their home is as weird as it is retarded.
quote:
Good, and building more homes will drive them down even further.
Non-whiners have been telling whiners like you to do this in the dozens of "boomers stole my prosperity" bitchfests on this board. You apparently agree, so why aren't more homes being built?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:49 pm to 1955
quote:
Then build them. Nobody is stopping you.
I am...bout to put another quality built home on the market in a good school zone.
There are much safer and easier ways to make money...but I love building and ill do it in every market
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:52 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
It IS a fact that Boomers STOLE from later generations to bail out their banks and mortgages.
I thought SFP might be cubbie's alter, but it looks like scottydoesntknow is.
You sound just like her claiming that men run everything when you flare your nostrils about "Boomers."
No one benefitted from bank bailouts but Boomers, huh?
What an imbecile you are.
And that's not an insult. It's just a fact. Or you can call it a FACT if you want.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:52 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Non-whiners have been telling whiners like you to do this in the dozens of "boomers stole my prosperity" bitchfests on this board. You apparently agree, so why aren't more homes being built?
First off boomers ARE thieves. We have the receipts
Second I am building homes. Literally at this very moment im measuring to order bathroom vanities. Because of me, another family will have another option to choose from in a nice, white school zone and im not charging 400k for it either
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:58 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
I thought SFP might be cubbie's alter, but it looks like scottydoesntknow is. You sound just like her claiming that men run everything when you flare your nostrils about "Boomers." No one benefitted from bank bailouts but Boomers, huh? What an imbecile you are. And that's not an insult. It's just a fact. Or you can call it a FACT if you want.
None of your insults will wipe away the receipts of your irresponsible behavior and selfish bailouts on that will be paid for after you are dead and gone
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:59 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
First off boomers ARE thieves. We have the receipts
lmao - sure you do.
quote:
Second I am building homes. Literally at this very moment im measuring to order bathroom vanities. Because of me, another family will have another option to choose from in a nice, white school zone and im not charging 400k for it either
So you're proving my point. I commend you. So why the bitching?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:07 pm to David_DJS
quote:
lmao - sure you do.
TARP
QE1-4
Covid lockdowns(and bailouts)
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:10 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
TARP
QE1-4
Covid lockdowns(and bailouts)
Why are those boomer things? And why stop with them? There are loads of other fedgov programmed largesse, is all fed spending on boomers?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:12 pm to scottydoesntknow
The supply and demand at play could rattle the markets for a long time. It’s not an easy trade off to pull off because it is not based on any basic economic fundamentals. There also won’t be many standing if overall supply is built out way too much. But this is all moot because except for certain markets the overall strategy of building supply upon millions of people leaving in short periods would slow new builds but renewable interest in city (known as inner city gentrification) and suburban would spike. But go ahead and carry 15-20 % building stocks and some stocks of financial companies carrying debt on large buildings around NY or even Nawlins, should make you a ton of paper
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:13 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:
I am...bout to put another quality built home on the market in a good school zone.
What’s your total profit on it?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:42 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Why do you tards act like someone will be in a loan for 50yrs
In your sell-buy constantly scenario, if you're not getting equity what's the point?
And then, the crucial question, is how you get that equity so quickly to make the early sale +EV?
ETA: my prediction is you'll argue irrational appreciation is efficient.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:44 pm to 1955
quote:
. It’s a way to get people into home ownership
But they own less for longer with that amortization schedule. Why not rent instead?
That's also assuming the house appreciates super quickly. If it doesn't the borrower is even further behind
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:45 pm to Nosevens
quote:
It’s not an easy trade off to pull off because it is not based on any basic economic fundamentals.
I wonder why that is hmmmm
Its almost like we have an artificial economy
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:58 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Why are those boomer things? And why stop with them?
Because boomers overwhemingly held the most political power then and had the most to lose if banks had failed, mortgages loans were called and the stock market crashed (aka a massive market correction).
Everyone would have suffered initially but America would have eventually recovered and rebuilt with a real economy and a reset dollar that was based on reality.
Instead we decided at that very moment that wed always intervene to make sure the economy "grow" by printing as much money as necessary to punt the problem to tomorrow.
The problem with printing money is that it doesnt create wealth, it dilutes it. Therefore those that were situated the best in their careers and investments, naturally soaked up a much higher percentage of the increased money supply, shifting the distribution of wealth to themselves.
THEFT
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 5:06 pm to the808bass
quote:
quote:I am...bout to put another quality built home on the market in a good school zone. What’s your total profit on it?
For this house wont be great probably less than 40k
Posted on 12/23/25 at 5:07 pm to scottydoesntknow
No dumb shitt, that is concerning to emptying the country of millions of people in short term whereas housing prices had run up as well as inflation in general. Getting them out releases housing availability for renters and purchasers but building on this exodus with heavy construction of housing could make a massive impact , negatively that is. Artificially supply of money into systems because of dumb actions of people, government and constituents alike causing inflation but irrational purchases causing spikes that are just as dangerous.
Popular
Back to top


0





