- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TRUMP FULLY ACQUITTED
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:36 pm to TigerBait1971
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:36 pm to TigerBait1971
Akin to a Crime. Best quote of the Night!
It was almost a crime.
I almost jwalked today. Guilty.
It was almost a crime.
I almost jwalked today. Guilty.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:36 pm to TigerBait1971
Did the POTUS have the authority to withhold? It seems obvious since he supposedly placed a hold. Thus, withholding is not a crime in and of itself
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:38 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
Well he did, didn’t he? Next question.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:40 pm to TigerProwl24
I can't stop staring at this dude's bald spot.
No idea what he is saying.
No idea what he is saying.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:43 pm to TigerBait1971
Senator Mcaskill. What? Unintended troll of the night.
These Democrats are AssClowns!
These Democrats are AssClowns!
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:44 pm to TigerBait1971
Why in the hell has a R senator or group not asked the question why the 18th House witness testimony, Michael Atkinson, has not been made available by the house managers and presented to the Senate?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:47 pm to BayBengal9
Does anyone recall whether there's been any question to House managers as to why the House never issued a subpoena to Bolton??
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:47 pm to EagleEye99
8 more hrs tomorrow Baw. Somebody will Have the stones.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:49 pm to davyjones
Yes because his deputy sued them after being subpoenaed and they didn’t have the time it would take and would lose anyway. They withdrew that subpoena days before a ruling.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:49 pm to KingOrange
Finally a legitimate question framed in way it should’ve been asked all night
Ask the question to opposing side to gain information
Ask the question to opposing side to gain information
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:50 pm to KingOrange
quote:
8 more hrs tomorrow Baw. Somebody will Have the stones.
Let's fricking hope so. Hard to fathom that not being relevant to these proceedings and forcing Schiff to answer it.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:50 pm to davyjones
There was.
Schiff said its because Bolton refused when he was asked politely to testify.
So he decided to not subpoena Bolton because he didnt want to litigate the subpoena when the WH would challenge the subpoena.
Schiff said its because Bolton refused when he was asked politely to testify.
So he decided to not subpoena Bolton because he didnt want to litigate the subpoena when the WH would challenge the subpoena.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:50 pm to TigerProwl24
Sekulow killing Dems again. Refusing to give up Presidential rights for some arbitrary decision
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:51 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
And finally a pointed question to a specific person
This is how the questions should have been all day.
This is how the questions should have been all day.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:53 pm to TigerProwl24
Chris Murphy says a lot of stupid shite, but asking if the Presidents counsel would agree to have the Chief Justice decide on the admission of documents and witnesses.. rofl
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:54 pm to sms151t
This is not about real Q and A. It’s kabuki theatre.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:54 pm to ClampClampington
How bad is it when you are considered the dumber senator from Connecticut?
Keep in mind that the other senator is Blumenthal, who is a corrupt lying sack of shite.
Keep in mind that the other senator is Blumenthal, who is a corrupt lying sack of shite.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:54 pm to KingOrange
Holy moly what an excellent answer
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:55 pm to KingOrange
I know I called it a debate earlier.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 9:56 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
BHP and I could answer these softballs. Let’s hear some meat. Ask both sides, If there is suspected corruption of a politician involving a foreign power, do you think it is an abuse of power to investigate that corruption regardless of political ties or are you immune from it if it is pursued by a political foe and considered an abuse of power?
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 10:02 pm
Back to top



0







