- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Top D.C. prosecutor resigns after being told to investigate Biden's climate spending
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:57 pm to John Barron
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:57 pm to John Barron
Weeding out the CCP.
Gotta do it.
Gotta do it.
0
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:58 pm to Decatur
quote:
Isn’t there a word
Looks like she was involved with the fraud. Sure some collusion was also involved
Posted on 2/18/25 at 1:58 pm to John Barron
quote:
Top D.C. prosecutor resigns after being told to investigate Biden's climate spending
stop
don’t
come back
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:00 pm to Decatur
quote:
Isn’t there a word for what she was ordered to do?
Yes and it is a four letter word. I think it is WORK. Not to be confused with WOKE>
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:00 pm to John Barron
She was worried she was being set up. She knows damn well that the vast majority of that “funding“ was a complete f*cking money laundering scam. But, as a Democrat, she knew there was no way she could get away with giving them a clean review. However, if she brought charges against those in the Biden administration orchestrating this scam, she would lose all of her Democrat bona fides. So, instead, she just quit.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:01 pm to loogaroo
quote:
loogaroo
Can you explain what you mean?
In the DOJ, prosecutors have discretion to determine whether a case meets the legal standard for prosecution.
Her and the FBI recommended a 30 day asset freeze citing lack of evidence
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:02 pm to John Barron
This one is pretty obvious:
She doesn’t want to get Arkancided.
No I'm not joking.
She doesn’t want to get Arkancided.
No I'm not joking.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:07 pm to Decatur
quote:
Isn’t there a word for what she was ordered to do?
It's a few words and it goes like this......
DO YOUR frickING JOB
If I told any boss i've had that response, I'm getting escorted out the door that day. And lets not get into the army of marxist lawyers and judges and leakers that didn't see a problem what they were asked to do to Trump.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:08 pm to John Barron
The earth is finally ACTUALLY healing. 
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:12 pm to Decatur
quote:
Isn’t there a word for what she was ordered to do?
Yes. Her boss told her to present to a grand jury. She refused. It’s pretty clear.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:14 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
If you resign over a question, I have to assume you are guilty of something malice.
quote:
they ordered her to immediately send a second letter to the bank demanding it freeze the assets as part of a criminal investigation.
"When I explained that the quantum of evidence did not support that action, you stated that you believed that there was sufficient evidence," she wrote.
"Based upon the evidence I have reviewed, I still do not believe there is sufficient evidence to issue the letter you described, including sufficient evidence to tell the bank there is probable cause to seize the particular accounts identified."
Cheung said in her letter she was ordered to resign
What do you mean resigned over a question?
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:16 pm to Decatur
quote:
Shesaid that She and her colleagues determined that there was not sufficient evidence to justify a grand jury probe into crimes including wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the United States.
Funny how you take this as gospel. Sounds awful subjective.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:16 pm to BBONDS25
If your supervisor ordered you to ignore DOJ rules regarding opening an investigation then you’d do that no problem?
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:16 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
What do you mean resigned over a question?
If she had convened the grand jury she wouldn’t have been ordered to resign. She refused to do her job.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:17 pm to Decatur
quote:
If your supervisor ordered you to ignore DOJ rules regarding opening an investigation then you’d do that no problem?
Which rule, specifically, do you allege she was ordered to ignore? Cite the section of the DOJ handbook.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:23 pm to BBONDS25
Like if you were ordered to open an investigation into someone and you are certain that probable cause has not been met. Just hypothetically. You’d still do that?
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:26 pm to John Barron
Can't wait to hear the part that she's a ChiCom spy...
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:28 pm to John Barron
Good. This is the best thing for America.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:29 pm to Decatur
quote:
were ordered to open an investigation into someone and you are certain that probable cause has not been met. Just hypothetically. You’d still do that?
Purpose of Grand Jury:
The grand jury's primary function is to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, not to decide guilt or innocence
You don’t need probable cause to open a grand jury investigation. You don’t even need evidence really.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:30 pm to John Barron
Nothing to see hear
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News