
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: They only pretended to care when Trump took office
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:18 pm to ragincajun03
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:18 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Well…but that cuts both ways, doesn’t it?
Anyone who doesn’t think there were some high dollar GOP donors on the real island logs, including some key to funding for Trump or key to others in his administration, and it was completely just one sided Democrats and their donors partaking must also believe in the Easter Bunny.
But see the bulk of the “end product” as far as a “list of names” is concerned was achieved during the Biden Presidency. Thus, the Democrats being “in charge” of said “end product” by virtue of the investigation being under the purview of the Executive Branch (again, led by Democrats) was completely under their veil of authority. As such, they could have released (or better yet, leaked) whatever they wanted insofar as info damaging to Republicans (i.e. Trump) were concerned, then “do away with” whatever info they didn’t particularly like, info damaging to the Democrats…..out of the public eye and without our knowledge, full stop. We’d have never known.
Seems pretty straightforward. What’s the excuse for why that is an impossible scenario in yall’s world??
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:02 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
This month, Massie introduced Epstein 2.0 and identified the 14(?) people from the Files that he thought should still be investigated. The majority of those names were discovered only from the release of the Files.
More proof you’re a moron. The names he released have been known for years
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:15 pm to Sweep Da Leg
And no mention of Clinton? List was shite
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:14 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Seems to me NO ONE in the D.C. Swamp cared at all about the victims. They all just wanted to score "look at me" points.
I think someone explained to the so called victims, that they themselves helped in the "trafficking" and might want to just continue the go fund me talk show circuit without getting to the legal issues.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:23 am to davyjones
quote:
So why wouldn’t the same people who would use information personal to Trump against him in this regard, but not use info personal to his “big allies or donors” against him just the same??
There you go again Davy, using logic, dont confuse them, OMB thats all that matters.
Remember when the dems "disclosed" that a victim named Trump several times. Then when you did see the transcripts it was the FBI repeatedly badgering her about Trump and her repeatedly saying he was not involved.....but his name was "mentioned by a victim" and the msm ran with it.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:28 am to Jbird
Pretty sure we were discussing epstein around 2013 and 2014 on here.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:36 am to Jbird
A better explanation than the truth?
Dick Durbin is an unrepentant criminal
Dick Durbin is an unrepentant criminal
Posted on 9/16/26 at 8:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The funny part is the vitriol against Massie who remained consistent the entire time.
Soooooo you try to point to the backpedaling of both parties by referencing Massie...... who has backpedaled on his promise to name individuals involved.
Absolutely genius.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:10 am to 3down10
quote:
Jes Staley (former JPMorgan executive) Leon Black (billionaire investor) Les Wexner (billionaire businessman) David Copperfield Lapo Elkann Tom Pritzker Glenn Dubin Frederick Facka Eduardo Teodorani Jean-Luc Brunel Danielle Seiyon Ramsey Elkoli Prince Andrew Leslie Groff
Weren’t most (if not all) of those names previously released?
Are any of them dead?
What prosecutable information is there?
When Massie released names before they were names of innocent people, what lends credence to those group of names?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:13 am to Stonehenge
quote:
Trump ran on releasing the Epstein Files
Plus about 2 dozen more important things ??
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:16 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Massie who remained consistent the entire time.
Except for him not naming fhe names like he promised
Are you saying he didn't name names?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:17 am to Jbird
I mean, there was this moment that gave hope that the unredacted files would be released


Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:27 am to Stonehenge
quote:
Trump ran on releasing the Epstein Files.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:34 am to Jbird
Forgive this slight side step here, but along with the many inconsistencies of this whole firestorm, why wont the victims release a list of 'clients' (rapists) as mentioned during a press conference last month on Capitol Hill? What precisely is going on here? There very people with the greatest motivations for convictions remain silent. Yes I understand their fear of reprisal, but then why have the press conference at all? And if fear of reprisal in what may be the biggest crime story on Earth motives their silence, then what hope do we have for ANY justice anywhere?
Just what in Sam Hill is going on here?
Just what in Sam Hill is going on here?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:45 am to Sams Crow
quote:
Forgive this slight side step here, but along with the many inconsistencies of this whole firestorm, why wont the victims release a list of 'clients' (rapists) as mentioned during a press conference last month on Capitol Hill? What precisely is going on here? There very people with the greatest motivations for convictions remain silent. Yes I understand their fear of reprisal, but then why have the press conference at all? And if fear of reprisal in what may be the biggest crime story on Earth motives their silence, then what hope do we have for ANY justice anywhere?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:15 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Except for him not naming fhe names like he promised
Except for him only getting things done when he unites with the DIMs
And people are still defending him, after the arse kicking his voters gave him
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:18 am to 3down10
I noticed you blatantly left off the names he called out who were innocent
Massie named more innocent names than new names that hadnt already been mentioned
Massie named more innocent names than new names that hadnt already been mentioned
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:36 am to BBONDS25
quote:If that was the case you cannot support Trump. Trump supported the bill Massie “sided with the Dems for”. Trump has supported multiple since then and called for a permanent suspension of the ceiling. Trump’s position on spending and debt ceilings is the same as democrats—zero limits. So you’re chuffed at Massie for “voting with democrats”(on a bill that passed with 149 republican votes), but not Trump who has continued to back and expanded democrat policy of unlimited spending and debt. Trump is 100% lock step with democrats on the debt ceiling.
It started when he was the deciding vote siding with the Dems to send Biden’s debt ceiling increase to the floor.
All while whining that Massie is a hypocrite. It’s absolutely fascinating.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 10:40 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:46 am to riverdiver
quote:
Weren’t most (if not all) of those names previously released?
Are any of them dead?
What prosecutable information is there?
When Massie released names before they were names of innocent people, what lends credence to those group of names?
No. And any names that were released prior would have only be a result of the bill he got passed to release the files.
He did not release any name of innocent people. You're talking about line filler photos that the DOJ did not properly mark as such and they were shown.

Popular
Back to top


0









