Started By
Message

re: They only pretended to care when Trump took office

Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:18 pm to
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
37794 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Well…but that cuts both ways, doesn’t it?

Anyone who doesn’t think there were some high dollar GOP donors on the real island logs, including some key to funding for Trump or key to others in his administration, and it was completely just one sided Democrats and their donors partaking must also believe in the Easter Bunny.

But see the bulk of the “end product” as far as a “list of names” is concerned was achieved during the Biden Presidency. Thus, the Democrats being “in charge” of said “end product” by virtue of the investigation being under the purview of the Executive Branch (again, led by Democrats) was completely under their veil of authority. As such, they could have released (or better yet, leaked) whatever they wanted insofar as info damaging to Republicans (i.e. Trump) were concerned, then “do away with” whatever info they didn’t particularly like, info damaging to the Democrats…..out of the public eye and without our knowledge, full stop. We’d have never known.

Seems pretty straightforward. What’s the excuse for why that is an impossible scenario in yall’s world??
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 7:19 pm
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
93149 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 7:46 pm to
So?
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
4826 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

This month, Massie introduced Epstein 2.0 and identified the 14(?) people from the Files that he thought should still be investigated. The majority of those names were discovered only from the release of the Files.


More proof you’re a moron. The names he released have been known for years
Posted by LSUthrilla
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
2153 posts
Posted on 9/15/26 at 9:15 pm to
And no mention of Clinton? List was shite
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21323 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:14 am to
quote:

Seems to me NO ONE in the D.C. Swamp cared at all about the victims. They all just wanted to score "look at me" points.


I think someone explained to the so called victims, that they themselves helped in the "trafficking" and might want to just continue the go fund me talk show circuit without getting to the legal issues.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
21323 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:23 am to
quote:

So why wouldn’t the same people who would use information personal to Trump against him in this regard, but not use info personal to his “big allies or donors” against him just the same??


There you go again Davy, using logic, dont confuse them, OMB thats all that matters.

Remember when the dems "disclosed" that a victim named Trump several times. Then when you did see the transcripts it was the FBI repeatedly badgering her about Trump and her repeatedly saying he was not involved.....but his name was "mentioned by a victim" and the msm ran with it.

Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
67852 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:28 am to
Pretty sure we were discussing epstein around 2013 and 2014 on here.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
50279 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:36 am to
A better explanation than the truth?

Dick Durbin is an unrepentant criminal
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
18276 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 8:56 am to
quote:

The funny part is the vitriol against Massie who remained consistent the entire time.


Soooooo you try to point to the backpedaling of both parties by referencing Massie...... who has backpedaled on his promise to name individuals involved.


Absolutely genius.
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
3149 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Jes Staley (former JPMorgan executive) Leon Black (billionaire investor) Les Wexner (billionaire businessman) David Copperfield Lapo Elkann Tom Pritzker Glenn Dubin Frederick Facka Eduardo Teodorani Jean-Luc Brunel Danielle Seiyon Ramsey Elkoli Prince Andrew Leslie Groff


Weren’t most (if not all) of those names previously released?

Are any of them dead?

What prosecutable information is there?

When Massie released names before they were names of innocent people, what lends credence to those group of names?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
50001 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Trump ran on releasing the Epstein Files

Plus about 2 dozen more important things ??
Posted by RemyLeBeau
Member since Mar 2015
2549 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Massie who remained consistent the entire time.


Except for him not naming fhe names like he promised


Are you saying he didn't name names?
Posted by RemyLeBeau
Member since Mar 2015
2549 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:17 am to
I mean, there was this moment that gave hope that the unredacted files would be released

Posted by wheelr
New Iberia
Member since Jul 2012
6257 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Trump ran on releasing the Epstein Files.


Posted by Sams Crow
Idaho
Member since Apr 2026
898 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:34 am to
Forgive this slight side step here, but along with the many inconsistencies of this whole firestorm, why wont the victims release a list of 'clients' (rapists) as mentioned during a press conference last month on Capitol Hill? What precisely is going on here? There very people with the greatest motivations for convictions remain silent. Yes I understand their fear of reprisal, but then why have the press conference at all? And if fear of reprisal in what may be the biggest crime story on Earth motives their silence, then what hope do we have for ANY justice anywhere?

Just what in Sam Hill is going on here?

Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
93149 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Forgive this slight side step here, but along with the many inconsistencies of this whole firestorm, why wont the victims release a list of 'clients' (rapists) as mentioned during a press conference last month on Capitol Hill? What precisely is going on here? There very people with the greatest motivations for convictions remain silent. Yes I understand their fear of reprisal, but then why have the press conference at all? And if fear of reprisal in what may be the biggest crime story on Earth motives their silence, then what hope do we have for ANY justice anywhere?

Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34540 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Except for him not naming fhe names like he promised

Except for him only getting things done when he unites with the DIMs

And people are still defending him, after the arse kicking his voters gave him
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34540 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:18 am to
I noticed you blatantly left off the names he called out who were innocent

Massie named more innocent names than new names that hadnt already been mentioned
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
64287 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

It started when he was the deciding vote siding with the Dems to send Biden’s debt ceiling increase to the floor.
If that was the case you cannot support Trump. Trump supported the bill Massie “sided with the Dems for”. Trump has supported multiple since then and called for a permanent suspension of the ceiling. Trump’s position on spending and debt ceilings is the same as democrats—zero limits. So you’re chuffed at Massie for “voting with democrats”(on a bill that passed with 149 republican votes), but not Trump who has continued to back and expanded democrat policy of unlimited spending and debt. Trump is 100% lock step with democrats on the debt ceiling.

All while whining that Massie is a hypocrite. It’s absolutely fascinating.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 10:40 am
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
40805 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:



Weren’t most (if not all) of those names previously released?

Are any of them dead?

What prosecutable information is there?

When Massie released names before they were names of innocent people, what lends credence to those group of names?


No. And any names that were released prior would have only be a result of the bill he got passed to release the files.

He did not release any name of innocent people. You're talking about line filler photos that the DOJ did not properly mark as such and they were shown.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram