- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: THE warharks insist that WE all believe Russia started the war. We started it. Here's how
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:50 am to wackatimesthree
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:50 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
What actions did the US take that violated international law
One question
Is that the same international law that the US has violated multiple times at least is argued by those at the UN
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:56 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
What actions did the US take that violated international law?
The US doesn't break international laws, we are the good guys.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 10:58 am to Nurbis
quote:
The US doesn't break international laws, we are the good guys.
We are sorta like Scar in the Lion King.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:16 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Russia clearly and inarguably took actions that violated international law.
This response is like trying to hold someone responsible for WWI. You have a chain reaction of bad ideas that can be traced back years if not decades. WWI did not start between Britain and Germany, it did not even really start between Serbia and Austria. There's a reason that part of the world (including Ukraine) is referred to as a powder keg. Wars start there all the time. Georgraphy changes, territory changes. In fact, Ukraine was once part of the boondoggle that was the later Austro-Hungarian empire and the subsequent collapse.

Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:17 am to RiverCityTider
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:18 am to texag7
quote:
texasfag7
Says the LGBTQ+ Kamala supporter
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:23 am to i am dan
quote:
NATO trying to take Ukraine was the final straw.
Prior to the invasion, and by NATOs own admission, Putin asked Stoltenberg to assure, in writing, that Ukraine will not become a NATO member or he would invade. NATO laughed in his face then mocked his request publicly.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:24 am to Nurbis
quote:
international laws
wtf are these? who voted for this? who enforces this?
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:26 am to wackatimesthree
I would.say that the coups we engineered were a violation of international law. And we broke a verbal.contract when we promised not one inch forward.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 11:29 am
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:26 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:Don't have to imagine as Chyna is doing this now. Monterey MX has become a large Chinese hub. And they are doing it with their large lands bought next to bases on American. Sure they are hiding it all under "businesses" but we know what's going on.
Imagine if Russia or China ran a coup in Mexico, put 12 spy bases on the border
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:26 am to Warboo
quote:
SFP will not be amused. I think I see a mushroom cloud forming over his office.
You work close to a public defender’s office ?
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:29 am to wackatimesthree
quote:No action breaks no international laws. But, it has been obvious that Biden could have absolutely stopped this was. Should have never started and it would not have happened under Trump, 1) because Nuland would not have been in the picture.
What actions did the US take that violated international law?
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:30 am to Warboo
quote:
Watch the video and you will find the answer you seek.
I skimmed it. The last NATO expansion I caught him referencing was in 2004.
That's 18 years prior to Russia's invasion in 2022 (I rounded up)
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:32 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Prior to the invasion, and by NATOs own admission, Putin asked Stoltenberg to assure, in writing, that Ukraine will not become a NATO member or he would invade. NATO laughed in his face then mocked his request publicly.
I was going to add this, but don't remember when was the first time Putin put that line in the sand. Does anyone know when he first said this?
I still smh over how all the Z-cucks ignore how Obama/Biden let Russia take over Crimea, and then made an issue over him doing this under Biden. Ignoring this and all the other shady stuff surrounding Democrats and Ukraine, just make them look like total fools.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:32 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Imagine if Russia or China ran a coup in Mexico, put 12 spy bases on the border, and had their equivalent of Biden, McCain, and Graham constantly visiting and meddling in Mexico's affairs. That doesn't even get into the NATO angle. Oh, and Merkel and Hollande have admitted Minsk II was a delay tactic to build up Ukraine.
And also Mexico then bombed Tiajuana or something.
frick Russia, frick Ukraine, and frick us for pouring the gasoline all over this mess.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:32 am to RiverCityTider
This is such a dumb debate at this point.
Russia invaded another country with a bunch of varying reasons and objectives for doing so, some involving pretty lame pretenses that collapsed on themselves They started the war that is still going. I say this while simultaneously arguing with the Ukraine-first weirdos on the OT thread.
We can argue about Ukraine's actions prior to that, the role of the US, how reasonable Russia's arguments for initiating the war were, etc. We're all familiar with the NATO expansion argument at this point and we'll have the next century to talk about whether we in some ways forced Russia's hand.
And in 25 years, I'll entertain novel narratives about how actually it was France or Poland or China who started it, as explained by some academic trying to find a new angle on a conflict for which there are already 100 books. But for present purposes, Russia started it and people contorting themselves to make the case otherwise are just being silly.
Russia invaded another country with a bunch of varying reasons and objectives for doing so, some involving pretty lame pretenses that collapsed on themselves They started the war that is still going. I say this while simultaneously arguing with the Ukraine-first weirdos on the OT thread.
We can argue about Ukraine's actions prior to that, the role of the US, how reasonable Russia's arguments for initiating the war were, etc. We're all familiar with the NATO expansion argument at this point and we'll have the next century to talk about whether we in some ways forced Russia's hand.
And in 25 years, I'll entertain novel narratives about how actually it was France or Poland or China who started it, as explained by some academic trying to find a new angle on a conflict for which there are already 100 books. But for present purposes, Russia started it and people contorting themselves to make the case otherwise are just being silly.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:35 am to RiverCityTider
Russia starts war to prevent NATO expansion to border, actually causes NATO expansion to border, doesn’t say a word.
You guys are dumb if you actually believe this is the cause.
You guys are dumb if you actually believe this is the cause.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:37 am to RiverCityTider
the west consistently broke promises to expand NATO eastward.
the west created a network of missile installations throughout Eastern Europe aimed at Russia.
the west "removed" a Russia-friendly president in Ukraine and installed their puppet.
the west immediately began threatening NATO membership for Ukraine, a known Russian red line.
the west sets up chemical weapon biolabs all over Ukraine, then lies about it.
Putin requests assurances that Ukraine will not join NATO and is told to GFH.
the west bombs Nordstream and blames it on Russia.
the west oddly scuttles early attempts at a cease fire between Russia and Ukraine.
There are NO GOOD GUYS in this affair.
the west created a network of missile installations throughout Eastern Europe aimed at Russia.
the west "removed" a Russia-friendly president in Ukraine and installed their puppet.
the west immediately began threatening NATO membership for Ukraine, a known Russian red line.
the west sets up chemical weapon biolabs all over Ukraine, then lies about it.
Putin requests assurances that Ukraine will not join NATO and is told to GFH.
the west bombs Nordstream and blames it on Russia.
the west oddly scuttles early attempts at a cease fire between Russia and Ukraine.
There are NO GOOD GUYS in this affair.
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:44 am to i am dan
quote:You make this easy, when your very first sentence is an outright lie.
Treaty in 1990 said that NATO would never advance east toward Russia.
That language is not included in ANY treaty or agreement between the West and the former USSR.
All that happened (and everyone admits it) is that the US said it would not put troops in the former East Germany, though that assurance was NOT memorialized in the written agreements.
At that time, no one was even CONSIDERING the possibility that Ukraine and the Baltics would soon be independent countries, rather than constituent elements of the USSR.
This post was edited on 2/26/25 at 11:49 am
Posted on 2/26/25 at 11:46 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
What actions did the US take that violated international law?
Thanks in advance for your answer.
You choose to look at the world the way that you wish it were, or the way that it ought to be.
Realists choose to look at the world the way that it is.
Popular
Back to top


0








