- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Trump admin admits even more ways DOGE [illegally] accessed sensitive personal data
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:19 am to 4cubbies
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:19 am to 4cubbies
quote:I missed that.
This board treated Hillary’s private server
Can you tell me what her private server is? Can we look at it’s contents and see what she was up to in there?
1
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:19 am to roadGator
He said "But it's Biden's fault!"
He got me real good.
He got me real good.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:20 am to 4cubbies
quote:
It remains unclear whether any data actually went to this group.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:21 am to 4cubbies
quote:
He said "But it's Biden's fault!"
He got me real good.
Nah, he just kinda got you.
The homeless guy you boinked that then stole your bicycle got you real good.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:21 am to 4cubbies
Stop. For your own good. But you leftists have zero ability to feel shame soooo…
quote:
There you go again... The Trump administrations' SSA lawyers stated they discovered the possible violation and are the ones who referred to a "federal watchdog" the possible illegal actions by the 2 DOGE members who may have violated election laws. That's right there in the text you quoted. You really can't help yourself...
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:21 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Can you tell me what her private server is? Can we look at it’s contents and see what she was up to in there?
I can't really explain what a private server is (definitely outside my realm of expertise and understanding) but she stored information from her job as SOS there. Google will likely have tons of info.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 11:22 am
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:22 am to 4cubbies
quote:Does not remotely align with the OP claim.
potentially outside of SSA policy
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:23 am to 4cubbies
It is a matter of proportionality. If something moves the needle 99% in the right direction, obsessing over the 1% misses the point. And it also places people who do it in an uncomfortable position-of providing moral cover for the kleptocratic and corrupt status quo. At some point the fixation on imperfection stops being principled scrutiny and starts functioning as quiet defense of the very system that is corrupt and wasteful and set up to enrich very specific bad actors. Having great intentions and a highly developed moral code, Cubbies-you would never do this-but many others with vested interest would.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:25 am to 4cubbies
Oh nos! The government has my social security number!
Oh wait.
Oh wait.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:31 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I can't really explain what a private server is (definitely outside my realm of expertise and understanding) but she stored information from her job as SOS there.
There are classifications of information (all of them) that you are only permitted to store on government systems and devices that are of the proper classification (you can't send Top Secret information to a system that is only authorized for Secret or classified, for instance.) Nothing else matters.
ETA: to be authorized for a level of information, the system needs an ATO (authorization to operate) that involves a lot of documentation and multiple management reviews and sign offs. You can't just bless it with lavender and claim it to be so.
Compound this with the local IT shop she had set it up retained administrative access to the system, which means they had access to all the data, which they were not authorized to have.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 11:36 am
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:35 am to 4cubbies
Why are you so opposed to free AND secure elections?
Do your ideas not win on their own at the ballot box?
Do your ideas not win on their own at the ballot box?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:44 am to LemmyLives
quote:Well at least she didn’t delete it when she got caught. That would be incredibly sketchy and point towards her knowing she was royally fricking up in a criminal manner.
There are classifications of information (all of them) that you are only permitted to store on government systems and devices that are of the proper classification (you can't send Top Secret information to a system that is only authorized for Secret or classified, for instance.) Nothing else matters. ETA: to be authorized for a level of information, the system needs an ATO (authorization to operate) that involves a lot of documentation and multiple management reviews and sign offs. You can't just bless it with lavender and claim it to be so. Compound this with the local IT shop she had set it up retained administrative access to the system, which means they had access to all the data, which they were not authorized to have.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:50 am to 4cubbies
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:51 am to crewdepoo
quote:
It's fine if this admin does it, as long as the Dems never try this shite
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:55 am to 4cubbies
NPR link huh? The same NPR that was defunded by Trump? I'm sure there isnt a bias. 
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:57 am to 4cubbies
This is the dumbest shite ever.
A governmental agency accessing government data.
Should the IRS have access to my financial data?
Oh shite! The DMV knows who I am and cops can get my info from my license plate!
Oh no! A governmental agency looking for fraud has access to data where payments are made! The horror!
What an absolutely stupid take.
A governmental agency accessing government data.
Should the IRS have access to my financial data?
Oh shite! The DMV knows who I am and cops can get my info from my license plate!
Oh no! A governmental agency looking for fraud has access to data where payments are made! The horror!
What an absolutely stupid take.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 11:58 am
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:57 am to 4cubbies
quote:
when the Social Security Administration said it discovered DOGE employees at the agency secretly and improperly shared sensitive personal data last year, but once again can't verify the extent of the violations.
quote:
The unnamed employees secr
quote:
that were potentially outside of SSA policy and/or noncompliant with the District Court's March 20, 2025, temporary restraining order
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:57 am to 4cubbies
So someone received sensitive information on you and your four baby-daddies. How unfortunate.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:00 pm to 4cubbies
quote:eat shite
4cubbies
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:01 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Lsupimp
How does it feel to be the most conciliatory poster this board has ever known?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News