Started By
Message

re: The Gun Control Bill Is “Protecting Our Kids Act” & Has Passed Committee On 25-19 Vote

Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:38 am to
Posted by LuckyTiger
Top 1% On Onlyfans
Member since Dec 2008
52513 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:38 am to
quote:

I can remember having my shot gun in my truck in high school when I would come straight from hunting to school


Remember the school shooting in Pearl, MS?

Coach Baw went out and got his gun out of his truck and neutralized the shooter.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
16725 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:40 am to
Basically they can not/do not want to stop crime so they are going to make more criminals.


We have the best leaders don't we folks?

Best and brightest.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
14752 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:40 am to
This is the hill many of us are willing to die and we won’t go easy
Posted by HughsWorkPhone
Member since Sep 2017
1479 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Just so everyone knows, this would effectively make the large majority of modern semi-auto handguns in America illegal.


frick the 10rd law, but I think it would only change magazines. Technically any magazine fed gun has the capacity of the magazine you put in it, whether 10 or 100 rounds.

Edit: Down votes without discussion? If this law would outlaw current magazine fed firearms rather than just magazines over 10rds id honestly like to know the answer
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 9:49 am
Posted by LuckyTiger
Top 1% On Onlyfans
Member since Dec 2008
52513 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Its not the criminals they are trying to disarm.


It will disarm people that go shooting at ranges on weekends.

Won’t do much to disarm people that go shooting other people in Chicago every night.

That’s why the government will have to do more.

They’re willing to take one step at a time.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42449 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:43 am to
No wonder it made it out of committee...look at the members.

https://judiciary.house.gov/about/members.htm

Majority (Dems)
Jerry Nadler, New York, Chair
Zoe Lofgren, California
Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
Steve Cohen, Tennessee
Hank Johnson, Georgia
Ted Deutch, Florida
Karen Bass, California
Hakeem Jeffries, New York
David Cicilline, Rhode Island
Eric Swalwell, California
Ted Lieu, California
Jamie Raskin, Maryland
Pramila Jayapal, Washington
Val Demings, Florida
Lou Correa, California
Mary Gay Scanlon, Pennsylvania
Sylvia Garcia, Texas
Joe Neguse, Colorado
Lucy McBath, Georgia
Greg Stanton, Arizona
Madeleine Dean, Pennsylvania, Vice Chair
Veronica Escobar, Texas
Mondaire Jones, New York
Deborah K. Ross, North Carolina
Cori Bush, Missouri

Minority (Repubs)
Jim Jordan, Ohio, Ranking Member
Steve Chabot, Ohio
Louie Gohmert, Texas
Darrell Issa, California
Ken Buck, Colorado
Matt Gaetz, Florida
Mike Johnson, Louisiana
Andy Biggs, Arizona
Tom McClintock, California
Greg Steube, Florida
Tom Tiffany, Wisconsin
Thomas Massie, Kentucky
Chip Roy, Texas
Dan Bishop, North Carolina
Michelle Fischbach, Minnesota
Victoria Spartz, Indiana
Scott L. Fitzgerald, Wisconsin
Cliff Bentz, Oregon
Burgess Owens, Utah
Posted by Pvt Hudson
Member since Jan 2013
4935 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Forgive my ignorance, but what do green tips do?


They typically have a steel rod encased in the lead. Helps penetrate further.

Not allowed at a lot of ranges, in case you plan to use them for practice.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Top 1% On Onlyfans
Member since Dec 2008
52513 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Forgive my ignorance, but what do green tips do?



Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
10381 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:45 am to
Memorial day Blem AR for $499.
Feels goodman.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
25907 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:47 am to
quote:

This would effectively outlaw most handguns


No it would be like the last ban where mags had plastic blocks under the springs to limit capacity to 10 rounds. Pre ban mags should still be allowed unless they have added language to outlaw possession
Posted by Thoresten
Member since Nov 2012
267 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:49 am to
This bill outlaws having a magazine over 10 rounds in your possession. Has a grant stipulation for a buyback program. This isnt “oh my mags are worth more cause they cant be sold” this is a straight up ban
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 9:50 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115470 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:50 am to
quote:

I’m 1791% sure I’m not abiding by this if it passes.


FIFY
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31554 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:53 am to
They’re going to frick around and find out aren’t they. God damn these people.
Posted by TideHater
Orange Beach AL
Member since May 2007
19868 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:57 am to
quote:

this would effectively make the large majority of modern semi-auto handguns in America illegal


Almost all handguns produced have California Compliant magazines as an option. We sell a ton of them. Almost all mag producers sell them.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
25907 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:58 am to
quote:

This bill outlaws having a magazine over 10 rounds in your possession. Has a grant stipulation for a buyback program. This isnt “oh my mags are worth more cause they cant be sold” this is a straight up ban


Well in that case they can all get fricked in the arse and die of monkey pox
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37354 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:00 am to
Are there a grandfather clause to this?
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 10:01 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63498 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Are there a grandfather clause to this?
Doesn't matter. Still unconstitutional and bad law.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 10:04 am
Posted by crash1211
Houma
Member since May 2008
3721 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:05 am to
quote:

I’m headed over to the Midway site to by bulk packs of AR and AK mags .


3D printer will go burrrr
Posted by Thoresten
Member since Nov 2012
267 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:05 am to
It shall be unlawful for a person to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
(2)

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of enactment of this subsection.

Im not sure whats goin on here one paragraph it says illegal to possess and the next one says otherwise. I could be wrong
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
5112 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:06 am to
quote:

No unserialized components or modifications.


Meaning what exactly? What is this supposed to accomplish? Is this supposed to make buying an upper the same as buying a lower for instance, or any currently non-serialized part for that matter?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram