- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Gun Control Bill Is “Protecting Our Kids Act” & Has Passed Committee On 25-19 Vote
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:11 pm to LuckyTiger
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:11 pm to LuckyTiger
No sensible human being agrees with these idiotic proposals.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:24 pm to oldskule
Unfortunately, Congress isn't made up of sensible people... nor is our electorate.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:27 pm to TigersnJeeps
I think this board tends to short change the electorate at large a wee bit. They aren’t all as informed as those of us who post in this board daily but I think they’re overall better than this board credits them for. It’s no coincidence the rise in an informed electorate is coalescing with the rise in alternative media imo. I could be wrong though.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:30 pm to td01241
This bill is just a smokescreen. It will never pass the Senate. This is where they want you to look. They don’t want you to pay attention to what’s going on in the Senate. This is where the real gun negotiations are taking place. The House is just done for political theater, give sound bites, and get folks fired up.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:34 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
Purchase age raised to 21 for semiautomatic rifles and shotguns exceeding 5 round capacity as well as all handguns, 18 for non semiautomatic rifles and shotguns and semiautomatic rifles and shotguns limited to 5 round capacity.
Then raise the age to join the military and police forces to 21. Raise the voting age to 21 and raise the age to legally contract to 21.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:42 pm to LuckyTiger
Here is a concept that works if you are a felon in possession of a firearm mandatory 15 year sentence . DA’s prosecute stop and frisk arrest and accept reasonable suspicion stops in high crime be or hoods the killings will go down , but it’s not about that . They want to take guns away from us because they want total Un questioned control.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:43 pm to Placekicker
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:47 pm to td01241
Penrod you broke dumbass how are you going to call someone out and not respond? I imagine you don’t work half days on Friday.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:48 pm to Placekicker
quote:
This bill is just a smokescreen. It will never pass the Senate
I wouldn't be so sure about that. They'll likely pass something with 10 round mag limit and go from 18 to 21 years old on certain arms.
This is as close as they've ever been to breaking the back of the 2nd. And they will take advantage of it. When the 10 round mag limit doesn't change anything and even more people are being shot and killed they will drop it to a 3 round limit, and so on.
Don't think for a second that Republicans in DC want to protect the second amendment. They want it gone too.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 12:57 pm to LuckyTiger
OP is incorrect.
It doesn't say this at all.
It is another "High Capacity Magazine" ban.
It looks like much the same language they have tried previously.
It is still all BS though.
It doesn't say this at all.
quote:
Capacity of all guns limited to 10 rounds.
It is another "High Capacity Magazine" ban.
It looks like much the same language they have tried previously.
quote:
602.Restrictions on large capacity ammunition feeding devices
(a)In general
Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:
(v)
(1)It shall be unlawful for a person to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
(2)Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession of any large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed on or before the date of enactment of this subsection
It is still all BS though.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:26 pm to Hangover Haven
1. Enforce all laws!
2. Arrest Criminals!
3. Prosecute Criminals!
:usa: :usa:
2. Arrest Criminals!
3. Prosecute Criminals!
:usa: :usa:
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:38 pm to Penrod
quote:
There will be gun control because the vast majority of Americans are in favor of it.
If anyone was f*cking stupid enough to actually believe that (other than complete f*cking retards LIKE YOU), then the left-wing nutjobs would merely need to go get a Constitutional amendment. But, we know that’s not going to happen. And, we know why.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 1:43 pm to SleepyJoe
I am also watching for requirements that force all transactions to be through an FFL.
Couple this with how aggressive the ATF has been on revoking FFLs, it's another way of indirectly reducing the number of firearms and our ability to use them.
Couple this with how aggressive the ATF has been on revoking FFLs, it's another way of indirectly reducing the number of firearms and our ability to use them.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:13 pm to stout
The 2A will be gone in our lifetimes.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:27 pm to LuckyTiger
Edit
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:35 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
But we have to do something!
The cry of every socialist.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:40 pm to LuckyTiger
I've been continually calling my sack of crap Senator, John Cornyn, leaving voice messages instructing him to vote against any attempts at so-called gun control. His aides won't pick up the damn phone to talk. He is absolutely worthless and won't rock the boat.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:42 pm to LuckyTiger
Exactly how many criminals are going to gaf about a law.
Posted on 6/3/22 at 2:43 pm to TigerIron
quote:
I would hope banning guns with 10+ rounds is a total nonstarter, but if it's not I'd be worried.
The courts have already spoken on a lot of this. They even were about to claim that the ban on 18 to 20 was unconstitutional but the two people that brought the suit turned 21 so the judge said it was moot at that point. I think they've built up the bill so that compromise would happen and they'd settle for the red flag portion alone.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 2:44 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News