- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The definitive video showing Good's vehicle striking the agent
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:38 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:38 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Tell us RA are you really as stupid as you come across here or are you just playing a role on the internets
This post was edited on 1/12/26 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:39 pm to jammajin
quote:Ignore it?
Also while ignoring the fact these two sweethearts had zero business putting themselves in the middle of this situation in the first place
Hell, I will STIPULATE to it.
Because it is utterly irrelvant vis-a-vis justification for the shoot.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:40 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Irrelevant that they were running interference on legal ice activity.
Brilliant!
Brilliant!
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:43 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Tell us, Dave, does boot leather taste like chicken?
There it is….the ultimate “how do I tell everyone that I’m a raging pussy” response. When all else fails….pull out the “bootlicker” accusations.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:43 pm to roadGator
quote:
This can’t go to court in MN or he’s guilty.
This is the state where the judge disallowed key evidence about police training in
The George Floyd “trial”.
Yup. The Chauvin trial was a tragedy. Unfortunately, this trial...if it happens...would have to be in Minnesota. I think the DOJ boxing out the Minnesota investigators was a function of wanting to avoid that.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:45 pm to pankReb
quote:If the boot fits ...
pankReb
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:47 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Well at least you’re confirming to us all that you're a raging pussy.
This post was edited on 1/12/26 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 1/12/26 at 9:53 pm to djsdawg
quote:
If someone shoots at you with a gun, I think you are allowed to shoot back until neutralized. Same idea applies here.
No it isn’t and you should know that
One is an suv and the other is a gun
Posted on 1/12/26 at 10:20 pm to Jbird
“Irrelevant that they were running interference on legal ice activity.”
I give up. RA is operating on a whole other level of logic here.
This place is mostly entertaining but holy crap you got a handful of real “winners” here
I give up. RA is operating on a whole other level of logic here.
This place is mostly entertaining but holy crap you got a handful of real “winners” here
This post was edited on 1/12/26 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 1/12/26 at 10:29 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
No it isn’t and you should know that One is an suv and the other is a gun
Supreme Court ruled on something similar already.
“ As for the lawsuit’s claim that 15 shots were too many, the Court says: “We reject that argument. It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended.”
During the brief span when all the shots were fired, the suspect “never abandoned his attempt to flee. Indeed, even after all the shots had been fired, he managed…to continue driving until he crashed.”
Car was still moving when he shot.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 10:45 pm to pankReb
Using the term bootlicker and the phrase ' half the country ' in one day no less. Kudos Hank. Your true identity is more apparent every day.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:34 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Tell us, Dave, does boot leather taste like chicken?
This is funny coming from the guy that told a poster earlier in the thread to shut up because the adults were talking.
Now back to - “you’re sitting on your arse typing away, all the comforts of home, all the time in the world to arrive at the right answer, and your brain can’t do the calculus you expect some other dude to do in a split second while a vehicle lurches towards him - and you’re willing to sit on a jury and judge him.“
Explain how that works.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:41 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
No it isn’t and you should know that One is an suv and the other is a gun
Both are deadly weapons in the wrong hands
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:03 am to RelentlessAnalysis
Ignorant homosexual.
She was a threat, she got gunned down like a dog.
She's a good commie now. All you commies eventually become good commies.
She was a threat, she got gunned down like a dog.
She's a good commie now. All you commies eventually become good commies.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:22 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
In the video taken from the other angle (driver's side), it appears clear that contact (if any) with the vehicle was minimal.
There is conclusive video proof, from multiple cameras, that there WAS contact. Your use of “if any” shows you to be tendentious.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:31 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
From this angle, it certainly DOES appear that the vehicle struck him.
But what?
Are you saying that it didn’t?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:36 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
You are completely mistaken.
Hey dumbass
I quoted the law verbatim
Yes you cannot use hindsight
Sheesh
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:40 am to David_DJS
quote:
This is funny coming from the guy that told a poster earlier in the thread to shut up because the adults were talking.
I'm not reading 18 pages but I'm willing to bet that somewhere in there Hank has already clucked his tongue about people resorting to cheap insults.
Some things never change.
Popular
Back to top


0







