- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The "Deal".'
Posted on 5/24/26 at 2:29 am to justsaygeaux2
Posted on 5/24/26 at 2:29 am to justsaygeaux2
So much for no nuclear … pathetic
Posted on 5/24/26 at 5:15 am to GeauxTigers123
quote:
Other than setting their military back by a decade. What have we gained?
That’s a lot. What do you want us to do, go in with ground troops? We can bomb them all we want but their leadership still won’t step down. They don’t care how many of their people die.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:14 am to justsaygeaux2
That's what should happen to be honest. Let the desert peeps fight for themselves
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:16 am to GeauxTigers123
quote:
Other than setting their military back by a decade. What have we gained?
You're not vaporized, idiot..
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:16 am to justsaygeaux2
quote:
The Strait of Hormuz will be fully reopened.
- Iran will not charge transit fees.
- The United States will make no payments to Iran.
- Sanctions on Iranian oil are lifted.
- Lebanon joins the ceasefire.
- 60 days are granted to negotiate nuclear issues.
On its face it's a good deal.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:18 am to GeauxTigers123
quote:Time will tell.
Other than setting their military back by a decade. What have we gained?
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:20 am to Tigergreg
quote:It appears everyone wants to criticize it.
The TDS crowd was still going to criticize it.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:22 am to justsaygeaux2
quote:
- 60 days are granted to negotiate nuclear issues
but retards like Dave Smith and Scott Horton said Iran isn't trying to build a bomb.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:23 am to hogcard1964
quote:It is a decent start.
On its face it's a good deal.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:24 am to Pragmatist2025
It should be criticized
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:26 am to Linoge
quote:
To truly end it, we would have to do a major ground invasion and lose alot of life. Even then, it would probably end like Iraq and Afghanistan did. And it would ensure the democrats take over for the next 10 years. It was Bush that created Obama remember?
WE just have to accept that we may need to do a bombing run like we did like last June every so often to keep their nuke development at bay.
Cut the deal and come home.
100%.
doing what's absolutely necessary to defeat the IRGC would result in significant collateral damage which we don't have the stomach for. maybe we were expecting an opposition to swell up which never occurred.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:28 am to HailToTheChiz
It should be criticized by those who believe it should be criticized, sure. Oh, or are you stating how everyone needs to think, if they wanna be correct??
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:29 am to justsaygeaux2
When Iran was under sanctions were they still getting paid by Russia and the UK via British Petroleum?
When Obama used the US Treasury printing machine--- to repay their sanctioned money. Did Obama or Iran pay it all back?
Was Iran getting backdoor oil money and all the money in the billIions of cash, gold,?
It must be...unless Russia, China. The UK, Financed their Navy and black arms deals in the Ukraine... That mostly came from Biden giving away trillions in Afghanistan..(including rare minerals to China)
When Obama used the US Treasury printing machine--- to repay their sanctioned money. Did Obama or Iran pay it all back?
Was Iran getting backdoor oil money and all the money in the billIions of cash, gold,?
It must be...unless Russia, China. The UK, Financed their Navy and black arms deals in the Ukraine... That mostly came from Biden giving away trillions in Afghanistan..(including rare minerals to China)
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:33 am to Mo Jeaux
Sure, to the same people who were gonna think that regardless, before the whole thing was even conceived. 
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:34 am to 632627
quote:If their ‘big 3’ nuclear facilities are severely damaged or inoperable, they won’t (can’t) be building a bomb. Their only hope would be their crazy neighbor giving them one. Then they still have to acquire a delivery system.
but retards like Dave Smith and Scott Horton said Iran isn't trying to build a bomb.
IMO, the only leverage they have with the uranium is selling it. Seeing as how not even a dangerous janitor can move around Iran without a missile falling on their head, they might have a hard time shuffling a half ton of uranium around.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:35 am to davyjones
Even if what you’re saying is true, it doesn’t matter. It absolutely is a win for them if this is the actual deal.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:40 am to Mo Jeaux
Oh that viewpoint carries no credibility with me. I very comfortably and confidently see it differently. All due respect.
This post was edited on 5/24/26 at 7:41 am
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:42 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:It should but a deal by definition has benefits for both sides. Some desire that they get NO benefits thus no deal, some think a deal should have ALMOST no benefits, while others want any remnant of the regime gone, dead or both. Then there is a small but growing group who think we should nuke them.
It should be criticized
There will be critics of all these things, as there should be.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 7:42 am to davyjones
Cool. That’s just your bruised ego though.
From the Iranian point of view, nothing has changed from pre-war to MOU, except that they will no longer have sanctions on their oil. It’s a net positive.
From the Iranian point of view, nothing has changed from pre-war to MOU, except that they will no longer have sanctions on their oil. It’s a net positive.
Popular
Back to top


0





