- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The "Deal".'
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:15 am to davyjones
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:15 am to davyjones
quote:
Well, you obviously care right now
Nope. I don’t care about your little political cult. I do care about this war and the economy.
quote:
And where did you get your damage assessments for Iran, pre-ceasefire? Elementary age Sunday School class? Where they don’t wanna place any heavy shite on the childrens’ conscience, so they fluff it up with lies??
What the frick does this even mean? You’re just lashing out because you’re mad. It’s weird. 
1
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:15 am to UtahCajun
Why enrich above power generation?
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:16 am to Jbird
quote:
Why enrich above power generation?
Well, in the past, it’s gotten them concessions.
This post was edited on 5/24/26 at 8:17 am
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:16 am to Jbird
quote:
Why enrich above power generation?
Did they enrich it?
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:17 am to Mo Jeaux
Iran will have a presidential election in 2028.
Iran will elect Donald J. Trump.
Iran will elect Donald J. Trump.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:18 am to Woolfpack
quote:
Iran will have a presidential election in 2028.
Iran will elect Donald J. Trump.
What?
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:25 am to UtahCajun
quote:
As of March 6, 2026 all intelligence reports said they were not enriching towards a bomb
They bragged that they had enriched a large amount to 60% during negotiations prior to the first strike. If that isn’t true, then they brought this on themselves, cause only use for enrichment at that levels is to make a bomb. They could quickly get that a little higher, and the assessment they boasted about were 10 warheads in a few weeks/ months… You realize that rhetoric led to this action. Were they lying?
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:25 am to moontigr
quote:
Regardless it’s all meaningless without a complete regime change
This is the answer. we are good at killing dictators but we are terrible at regime change
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:27 am to Mo Jeaux
You just tellin everybody how it is, huh? Up to and including tellin em their current feelings and emotions.
Ain’t said anything right yet, but never even check up.
Ain’t said anything right yet, but never even check up.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:31 am to davyjones
No, I’m telling you that you’re reacting in a purely emotional manner because your feelings are hurt.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:34 am to Mo Jeaux
Get well soon.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:44 am to Lsut81
quote:
If so, 1-4 were already happening before we spent billions of dollars, lost 13 service members, and drove gas up to over $4 natl average.
That’s the problem that some of us have with this. Point 4, no sanctions, wasn’t the case before Feb. This was basically a trade off of bombing their sites for the lifting of sanctions. There’s no other way to paint this.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:44 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
Were they lying?
We know they went to 60%. We also know how much they had. We performed a strike last year because they refused to answer inspectors' questions about material that was moved. By all accounts, that strike was extremely successful and set them back years. Intelligence after that strike says they were not attempting to restart.
Were we lying?
This post was edited on 5/24/26 at 8:45 am
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:47 am to Free888
quote:
There’s no other way to paint this.
Well the hardcore Trumpers who have 0 objectivity are going to take this shite sandwich, eat it up, and claim its the best meal ever.
You can support a majority of what he does.has done, but still be critical of assinine decisions like this.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:48 am to UtahCajun
Let me guess they weren't building missiles to reach most of Europe either?
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:49 am to Free888
Calm down, fella. It specifically references oil. Seeing as how they been getting around sanctions with their oil anyway, exactly what are we giving up there?? So see it’s really just a hollow trophy, the Iranians know that. But I suppose that they’re relying on enough easy marks to think that’s a notch for their side and make a little noise about it……however it soon thereafter fizzles out forever. You don’t happen to know anyone stuck in the trap described, do you??
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:49 am to Jbird
quote:
missiles to reach most of Europe either?
And thats our problem, how?
Nothing that have or will be capable of any time in the near future could reach the US. They were an Israel and EU problem. Let them front the bill and deal with it.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:50 am to Lsut81
quote:Oh so lead from behind ala Clinton and Obama?
Let them front the bill and deal with it.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:51 am to davyjones
quote:
Seeing as how they been getting around sanctions with their oil anyway,
Now they don’t have to “get around” the sanctions fella.
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:53 am to Free888
I wouldn’t bother with davy. He’s retarded and overly emotional.
Page 5 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News