Started By
Message

re: The board room is killing America. And themselves.

Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:20 am to
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41082 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:20 am to
quote:

Good post, I would add that the CEO has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders. If he doesn't act in their best financial interests, they can bring legal action against him. It's not so much a boardroom decision, as much as a financial imperative.


Has a single shareholder ever been successful at trial for a claim that a company should have offshored production, but didn’t?


This argument is thrown out a lot in these threads. It’s incredibly weak. If that’s all it took for a company to be sued, every company would be getting sued by its shareholders daily.
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
409 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:45 am to
Great post. The past is always the best predictor of the future. The rise and fall of the Roman empire is a great example of this.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59172 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:51 am to
The simple fact is that Americans are the only people in the world with money to buy anything and it’s always been that way


It’s dumb to have American companies manufacture things in other countries to sell to Americans
Posted by IMSA_Fan
Member since Jul 2024
836 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:54 am to
I feel like the title of this thread should be “free markets are killing America” - which I do not agree with
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59172 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Again, the peak year for manufacturing jobs in America was 1979

Hmmm it seems like manufacturing jobs went away after boomers started voting
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61365 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 7:54 am to
MBAs are killing America.

I'll show some restraint and I'll leave the c-word out of this post.
Posted by DingLeeBerry
Member since Oct 2014
11780 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:02 am to
quote:

A corporation doesn't exist to produce goods and services, nor to provide jobs, it simply, and legally, exists solely to increase value for its shareholders - regardless of social, cultural, or national interests.


And therein lies the problem. Business aren’t run for longterm success, they are instead treated like money laundering operations and the goal is stock price ebb and flow for the benefit of short term shareholders and execs cashing in on stock options. The business is no longer the actual business, it is simply the cash flow that is viewed as “the business”.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 8:04 am
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3996 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 8:54 am to
quote:

we need to find a way to switch it to the primary priority.

Here's the problem, corporations are people with the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. And it turns out that the one thing that corporations are required to generate, wealth, is now considered speech.

Generally, competitive interests even out power of corporations except in one case, where their interests coincide.

All corporations will use all of their influence (money) to petition the government against those things that threaten to restrict them as a whole. It would take an enormous amount of money for the actual People to buy the politicians away from the corps.

We've created a monster that we really have no control over.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11355 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:08 am to
quote:

My point is that it is a central part of the corporate structure, it's not just boardroom decisions. CEOs have limited options.


When the 2008 crisis hit, my company chose to make less income rather than laying off people.

The idea that corporations exist solely to make money and that nothing else can even be considered is why we are in this mess to begin with.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
6265 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:15 am to
quote:

Corporate America optimized so aggressively for short-term margins that it slowly dismantled the source of long-term demand


Thats because our economy operates on a quarterly schedule where you get irrationally shredded over 3 months of performance. When you are talking about trillion dollar companies, there is very little that should be causing big valuation swings on a routine 3 month basis.

quote:

People love to invoke the invisible hand. They say the market will allocate resources efficiently.


Publicly traded companies should only be required to release form 10ks instead of the quarterly seesaw. The market is not allocating resources efficiently because modern society is built on short term gratification.

Who here is going to argue that meme stock traders are allocating resources efficiently?
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 9:16 am
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3996 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:23 am to
quote:

The idea that corporations exist solely to make money

They do. What are the legal obligations of a corporation?
quote:

nothing else can even be considered

Nobody ever said that. It's up to the shareholders.

A fiduciary is a person that makes financial decisions for another party who is legally obligated to act in the client's best interests.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49830 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:28 am to
Agree 100%. Class warfare is over and it wasn’t a war it’s was a slaughter abs the middle class was decimated. We are entering third world status. We are basically going to be Mexico with a massive army. That’s why the rest of the world is shifting away from us, we are an empire in a free fall decline and all we are go at is war now
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
6265 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:29 am to
quote:

It's up to the shareholders.


No its not

Most stocks are owned by average joe either through 401k, IRA, or pension fund. However they rarely have voting rights, which are either granted to the fund managing their money, or to the board of their pension fund. For people who buy stocks independently of retirement accounts, they rarely register to vote because their vote holds so little weight. Thats assuming there arent multi classes of stock where their common stock even holds any power
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13434 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:31 am to
quote:

It’s dumb to have American companies manufacture things in other countries to sell to Americans


No, it's dumb to pay more for the same item just to have it manufactured here.

As is frequently pointed out, the US still has the 2nd leading manufacturing base in the world, and is only second to China b/c of their greater population.

Why does it make sense to force ALL manufacturing here when it would cost Americans more money to buy the same items when the difference is 7.6 million jobs (out of 170 million) that pay an average of $16.88 an hour?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59172 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:33 am to
It wouldn’t cost Americans more money

Have fun with your Chinese washing machine that makes you watch ads and dies after 2 years



I’ll keep using my 30 year old American washing machine
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13434 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:


Hmmm it seems like manufacturing jobs went away after boomers started voting


LOL.

Boomers started voting in 1967. Manufacturing grew for another 12 years after that before it started declining.

Also, what government policies do you think caused manufacturing to decline? What did "boomers" vote for exactly?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59172 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:42 am to
Uhhh the first boomers would’ve been 13 in 1967


You’re thinking of the silent generation

quote:

Also, what government policies do you think caused manufacturing to decline? What did "boomers" vote for exactly?

NAFTA and illegals
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26476 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 9:50 am to
Tariffs do affect this decision making equation.

Then too, China built a massive refrigerator and air conditioning plant in SC in part due to the high cost of shipping heavy products.

Being dependent on foreign production is a serious national security issue.
Posted by Bayou Warrior 64
Member since Feb 2021
943 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 10:21 am to
I appreciate your sharing this, but the problem and solution are much simpler. The government needs to stay the hell out of every business and industry (which it never will). The government needs to stop picking winners and losers.

It starts with a SIMPLE tax system (the fair plan, flat rate, whatever). No one gets preferential accelerated depreciation over another industry, etc. We sadly are a nation which likes our cheap shite (thank you WalMart and now Amazon) regardless of the simple fact that buying local and USA is better when available . We have been brainwashed that cheaper is better since the mid 1980s. In doing so, the local businesses in most town have been gutted and abandoned.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 11:08 am
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55479 posts
Posted on 11/19/25 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Every time the pattern repeated. A manufacturing job became a service job.

This is a big flaw in your analysis, because it’s plainly false. We have replaced less sophisticated manufacturing jobs with more sophisticated ones. It’s true that some of the workers moved from manufacturing to service, but not that all, or even close to all, did.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram