- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/7/22 at 3:57 pm to TGFN57
quote:
What about/now do.....like a broken record.
Imagine people wanting equal application of the law.
You’re just another dem letting everyone know yet another part of the constitution you dislike. We get it.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 3:57 pm to LeClerc
quote:
He made baseless claims just to rile people
Joe Biden did exactly the same when he campaigned in 2016.
Remember the fine people hoax?
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:02 pm to deeprig9
quote:
To win a defamation case, you have to prove the person doing the defaming was wrong. It was pretty easy to prove Jones was wrong in his accusation that the Sandy Hook parents were really just CIA actors.
So anyone in the media calling the FLs "Parental Rights in Education" bill "The Don't Say Gay" bill can be acvused of defamation of some kind?
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:04 pm to Tiger n Austin
quote:
Sure Trump is on tape asking Georgia officials to "find" votes, but he's on my team so that's ok"
Well they did find votes on usb drives. So it’s possible more could be found because of how shitty Georgia is at running an election.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:04 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Now do/whatabout...what fricking morons.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:20 pm to Revelator
Jones is just another example of the political battle going on in America. There are very few people who think Jones was being responsible or sensible by saying Sandy Hook was a hoax/false flag but it was just his wacky opinion.
My contention is simple, if no one went to prison over the Trump/Russia collusion hoax, then I’m not sure how Jones is legally on the hook for millions of dollars in restitution/damages. The blatant two tier justice system is eventually going to be the BS that triggers nationwide social unrest.
My contention is simple, if no one went to prison over the Trump/Russia collusion hoax, then I’m not sure how Jones is legally on the hook for millions of dollars in restitution/damages. The blatant two tier justice system is eventually going to be the BS that triggers nationwide social unrest.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:22 pm to Revelator
I don't understand why Taylor Lorenz's victims entitled to the same recourse.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:27 pm to Taxing Authority
I agree with the Taylor Lorenz thing. I don’t know the specifics But if she’s lying about people than for sure. Because she sure as hell is harassing them and destroying lives
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:37 pm to TGFN57
quote:
Now do/whatabout...what fricking morons.
Imagine being against equal application of the law. Constitution hating moron.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:39 pm to Tiger n Austin
quote:Get out of Austin, unless you're looking for a transsexual "girl"friend. You're obviously not among intelligent social circles.
"Sure Trump is on tape asking Georgia officials to "find" votes, but he's on my team so that's ok"
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:40 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Jones was wrong in his accusation that the Sandy Hook parents were really just CIA actors
How does one prove you do not work for the cia?
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:42 pm to Revelator
This group of DEMS have politically weaponized the legal system....just like they will weaponize these 87,000 new IRS Gestapo agents.
I promise you they ain't gonna audit poor Black people....it will be the White supremicist who they are after.
I promise you they ain't gonna audit poor Black people....it will be the White supremicist who they are after.
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:50 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
My contention is simple, if no one went to prison over the Trump/Russia collusion hoax, then I’m not sure how Jones is legally on the hook for millions of dollars in restitution/damages.
And this is my beef
Posted on 8/7/22 at 4:53 pm to oldskule
quote:
This group of DESM have politically weaponized the legal system....just like they will weaponize these 87,000 new IRS Gestapo agents. I ppromise you they ain't gonna audit poor Black people....it will be the White supremicist who they are after.
No doubt. The Dems and their accomplices are fine to use the power of the government to target their enemies. They think it’s their moral obligation
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 5:02 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
it was just his wacky opinion
It was a little more than that.
quote:
My contention is simple, if no one went to prison over the Trump/Russia collusion hoax, then I’m not sure how Jones is legally on the hook for millions of dollars in restitution/damages. The blatant two tier justice system is eventually going to be the BS that triggers nationwide social unrest.
You're equating criminal sanctions and civil penalties? No. Just...no.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 5:08 pm to jnethe1
quote:That you will face civil liability if you (knowingly and with a profit motive) spread lies about grieving parents?
you can’t see the ramifications of this.
That would be horrible.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 5:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
That you will face civil liability if you (knowingly and with a profit motive) spread lies about grieving parents?
Because defamation specifically deals with reputational damages, not hurt feelings. Where are these damages? Have Jones's allegations hindered anyone's employment or caused them to lose income they otherwise would have had?
You have presumably read Snyder vs. Phelps. You cannot legally recover under the torts of outrage or IIED for what amounts to political speech. This case is Exhibit A in how you bootstrap a defamation claim to avoid the constitutional prohibition on recovery for what should be the primary causes of action.
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 8/7/22 at 5:57 pm to Revelator
It's only dangerous because it's only easy to sue and win against non-state media influencers for defamation and slander. It's almost impossible to sue and win against state media influencers for defamation and slander.
It's broken because the law is mainly only applied in one direction. I still get irked thinking about the rittenhouse trial. State media went out of their way to distort facts and lie. They tried desperately to influence the jury, to get them to destroy that kid's life. Painting him as a subhuman nazi who viciously killed peaceful protesters because he was racist.
It's broken because the law is mainly only applied in one direction. I still get irked thinking about the rittenhouse trial. State media went out of their way to distort facts and lie. They tried desperately to influence the jury, to get them to destroy that kid's life. Painting him as a subhuman nazi who viciously killed peaceful protesters because he was racist.
Posted on 8/7/22 at 5:58 pm to deeprig9
quote:Are you unable to see a difference in these examples?
To win a defamation case, you have to prove the person doing the defaming was wrong. It was pretty easy to prove Jones was wrong in his accusation that the Sandy Hook parents were really just CIA actors. The media that wrongly accused Rittenhouse, and the prep school kid at the capital, of being racists etc.... you don't think those people should be sued for defamation?
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News