- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The +3 Harris Iowa Poll - Are you guys insane?
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:18 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:18 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:It is a suppression poll. That’s it.
If it was a fricking junk poll no one would care, but it’s not.
It was paid for fluff.
quote:The only interesting aspect is those, like you, who think it has value, although you aren’t willing to stand by it.
It doesn’t have to be a catastrophe, it’s just interesting
Again, if this poll is even within a margin of being accurate, Trump loses every single state.
That is how absolutely insane this poll is.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:18 pm to Scruffy
I keep saying it.... The polls are there to be the "data" when they steal this election again. I hate to be pessimistic. I just didn't see where anything changed to make sure elections are more secure.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:19 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
It doesn’t have to be a catastrophe, it’s just interesting
Especially if her methods were the same in her 2 previous polls.
June Trump +18
September Trump +4
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:20 pm to TDTOM
quote:I don’t know about jackass, but he is clearly retarded.
Nawlins isn't worth banning shite over. He is a jackass.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:20 pm to bamabonners
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:20 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Again, if this poll is even within a margin of being accurate, Trump loses every single state.
Just because you keep saying this doesn’t make it true
quote:
although you aren’t willing to stand by it.
I can acknowledge its possible value and still think she’s losing Iowa. Jesus dude
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:21 pm to Proximo
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:21 pm to NawlinsTiger9
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:22 pm to Scruffy
quote:
I don’t know about jackass, but he is clearly retarded.
Alright man I gave you the benefit of the doubt because I like you but you’ve clearly let this election shite break you. Best of luck
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:22 pm to Scruffy
Don't even make that bet scruffy we need you
Learned Doctor and all
Learned Doctor and all
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:23 pm to OMLandshark
Literally said she was still losing Iowa in that same post
My god yall are beyond help
My god yall are beyond help
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:24 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:It was a larger margin of victory than Texas and Florida.
Just because you keep saying this doesn’t make it true
If a state that was so heavily in Trump’s pocket in 2020 switched to being close to Harris, even, or marginally Trump, then Texas and Florida, which both had half of the spread, wouldn’t stand a chance, let alone PA, WI, MI, VA, NC.
Do you actually read what you post?
quote:It isn’t a matter of just losing.
can acknowledge its possible value and still think she’s losing Iowa. Jesus dude
It is the point spread.
If you think Trump has lost that degree of support in Iowa, of all places, the election doesn’t even need to occur at all.
Harris will win every state.
That is how insane that poll actually is.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:25 pm to NawlinsTiger9
It’s getting as much attention as it is because it’s so fricking ludicrous 
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:25 pm to Scruffy
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/3/24 at 9:31 am
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:26 pm to joshua2571
quote:
Nobody was talking Iowa before this poll. Hell, I don’t know if Harris has even been to Iowa. If her internals thought she could win Iowa, Harris would be in Iowa. This poll is an outlier.
This lady Selzer is going to have egg on her face after this election.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:27 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Break me?
Alright man I gave you the benefit of the doubt because I like you but you’ve clearly let this election shite break you. Best of luck
You’ve lost all critical thinking skills.
And I’m fricking pessimistic about this election.
I’m also not an idiot though.
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:30 pm to Scruffy
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:37 pm to Jwho77
The future of Democracy at stake alright.
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:37 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
If it’s indicative of waning support in key demos for midwestern states and he *only* wins Iowa by 4-5 points, then he’s probably in trouble in the grand scheme
It’s an outlier from a very good pollster, it’s not gospel.
You seem to think it must be dead on accurate to be a useful data point and that just isn’t how to evaluate these things
Posted on 11/2/24 at 9:38 pm to Jwho77
So every other state says Economy/inflation and Immigration are there top 2 issues? All 49 others states. We're talking, 100s of polls that have all agreed on that for the last year.
But Iowa....IOWA says their top 2 issues are Democracy and Abortion
That should eliminate all doubt this is highly skewed for the Harris campaign
But Iowa....IOWA says their top 2 issues are Democracy and Abortion
That should eliminate all doubt this is highly skewed for the Harris campaign
This post was edited on 11/2/24 at 9:41 pm
Popular
Back to top


2








