- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Talarico; “modern science recognizes that there are many more than 2 biological sexes”
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:11 am to Powerman
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:11 am to Powerman
No you dont. You are trying to straddle the fence to keep people from laughing you out of the room.
You did this with electrical steel. " No such thing! I work in this industry, I know"....then exposed.
You have always defended the left position and try to sway the opinion of conservatives.
Its people like you that got us to this point. Compromising everything.
You did this with electrical steel. " No such thing! I work in this industry, I know"....then exposed.
You have always defended the left position and try to sway the opinion of conservatives.
Its people like you that got us to this point. Compromising everything.
1
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:11 am to Powerman
quote:
I believe he might be correct but the "other 4" are anomalies and deformities.
You defeat your own argument. Anomalies and deformities of the two sexes are just that: anomalies and deformities of the two sexes. They don't magically create some third option.
Understand this, "sex" in humans is determined solely by whether that person's biology is geared toward producing eggs or producing sperm, with other biological aspects (height, strength, muscle density, etc) supporting or being associated with one or the other. As such, there can be no "other" options.
For ovotesticular disorder of sex development ("OT-DSD," which is the new clinical term for "hermaphrodite"), they are often sterile with their deformity normally having a more developed (thus more dominant) set of sex organs and a weaker one (most often the female organs are the more dominant). Even the rare exceptions which are not sterile are only non-sterile through one set of sex organs (the dominant one), not both. Thus, they are either male or female.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:16 am to Powerman
[quote]But in this case Talarico doesn't appear to be factually wrong[/quote]
Ok, let Talarico double down on his beliefs in a public forum and we'll see how the fine people of Texas take his view of modern science as it relates to religion and God.
Ok, let Talarico double down on his beliefs in a public forum and we'll see how the fine people of Texas take his view of modern science as it relates to religion and God.
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 9:19 am
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:28 am to GatorOnAnIsland
He's not wrong---although the others are rare.
I really wish the Dems let this stuff die. No one cares.
I really wish the Dems let this stuff die. No one cares.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:55 am to Powerman
quote:
believe he might be correct but the "other 4" are anomalies and deformities.
XXYs and XYYs are men.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:41 am to Jjdoc
quote:
You did this with electrical steel. " No such thing! I work in this industry, I know"....then exposed.
What was that all about?
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News