- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Talarico; “modern science recognizes that there are many more than 2 biological sexes”
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:36 am to John somers
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:36 am to John somers
quote:
John somers
Hi, John. Have you learned the word “effected” yet?
0
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:37 am to Powerman
quote:
I don't think you're literate.
I didn't deny the existence of male and female. I denied the existence of the other 4-63 genders/sexes.
One need not be literate to understand there are but two sexes, anyway.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:38 am to Powerman
No, Talarico is wrong and you are wrong. There are only 2 scientific biological genders, male or female.
Talarico is just a polished up version of the weirdos walking around with pink and blue hair and septum ring claiming 80/11 genders and pronouns.
When kids play pretend, we just realize they are kids. When adults do it, its called a mental illness.
Talarico is just a polished up version of the weirdos walking around with pink and blue hair and septum ring claiming 80/11 genders and pronouns.
When kids play pretend, we just realize they are kids. When adults do it, its called a mental illness.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:40 am to SallysHuman
quote:
One need not be literate to understand there are but two sexes, anyway.
So is someone with a sexual reproductive or chromosome anomaly a male or a female? And how would you make that determination?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:42 am to Powerman
quote:
So is someone with a sexual reproductive or chromosome anomaly a male or a female? And how would you make that determination?
If you have a Y chromosome you are male.
If you have a Y chromosome with ambiguous genitalia you are still a male
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:43 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Human biological sex is binary. A person has more either male or female chromosomes. Period. The end.
But there’s more. The binary centers on the gametes, not the genes per se.
Human sexuality is binary and all of our evolutionary traits support that binary nature of complementarity.
Females are designed to produce eggs (large gametes) and are designed to nurture the eggs through gestation, a very demanding task that makes them very vulnerable.
Males are designed to produce sperm, lots of em, and thus are designed to compete for reproduction and to protect the offspring and the village.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:44 am to Powerman
quote:
So is someone with a sexual reproductive or chromosome anomaly a male or a female?
Depends on the anomaly. I haven't researched every anomaly. Don't need to. Sex is binary, anomalies and deformities don't change that.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:49 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
The binary centers on the gametes
This is correct according to the science.
There are only two biological reproductive pathways and every individual is firmly on one of those pathways regardless of what anomalies arise in the expression of them.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:51 am to Powerman
What???
Keep on coming out of the dem closet.
Keep on coming out of the dem closet.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:52 am to wackatimesthree
BTW, only on this board would the response of someone posting a scientific journal article from the National Institute of Health to support their view be a silent downvote.
This board really is full of cretins.
This board really is full of cretins.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:53 am to Powerman
quote:
But in this case Talarico doesn't appear to be factually wrong
That's not the point though. Yes, there are intersex people who are biologically a mixed bag due to mutations. The problem is that the transgender community likes to use these rare anomolies as proof that the premise of transgenderism is legitimate by conflating the two. Talarico, in saying this, is purposefully signaling to the transgender community that he has their back. There's no other reason to even be bringing this subject up.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:55 am to Powerman
quote:
This is backed by biology
No, its not. Deformities aren't their own biological sex. They're anomalies within male or female sexes.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:57 am to GatorOnAnIsland
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:57 am to Powerman
quote:So that means someone is correct to say humans have horns because there are a handful of people who have cutaneous horn growth?
I believe he might be correct but the "other 4" are anomalies and deformities.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:59 am to GatorOnAnIsland
we back to quoting the bible? that's rich..
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:00 am to biscuitsngravy
We know you are a Talarico 
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:03 am to SUB
quote:
That's not the point though.
Well, it kind of is.
Because he IS wrong.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:05 am to Powerman
quote:
So is someone with a sexual reproductive or chromosome anomaly a male or a female?
They are an abnormality.
Allow Cambridge to explain what that is.
quote:
different from what is usual or average, especially in a way that is bad
quote:
It describes a state or behavior that differs from an established standard or norm, and is often associated with something that is unusual, irregular, or potentially harmful
Those that you are claiming to be a new gender will still have more of one than the other.. thus they are male or female.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:05 am to SUB
quote:
That's not the point though. Yes, there are intersex people who are biologically a mixed bag due to mutations. The problem is that the transgender community likes to use these rare anomolies as proof that the premise of transgenderism is legitimate by conflating the two. Talarico, in saying this, is purposefully signaling to the transgender community that he has their back. There's no other reason to even be bringing this subject up.
Yes. And as I said, I fully agree with you.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News