Started By
Message

re: Sydney Powell is a sad example of the cost of emotional thinking & going off the deep end

Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:18 am to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119777 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:18 am to
what a depressing time period that was
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465807 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:18 am to
quote:

You are offering an opinion (actually 2, you very quickly moved on to the grift motivation) trying to explain why she did what she did.

Yes, this is a message/discussion board.

quote:

You aren't supporting your position with any evidence.

It's referenced in OP. Do you want me to list all of the lost lawsuits, sanctions, lawsuits against her, licensure attacks, and now criminal indictments specifically?

OH WAIT, I did:

quote:

She's disgraced, possibly disbarred, being sued for billions, and faces criminal charges
This post was edited on 8/15/23 at 10:19 am
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8394 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:19 am to
This is a really interesting thread the more I think about it.

One of the most fascinating things to me is flaws in the human reasoning system.

The whole Qanon thing was wild. To those of us on the outside it was obviously just some prank/attention grab/bored lunatic.

To people on the inside it was the most important thing in their lives. It was everything, it explained everything, and it was worth losing everything (family, friends etc).

When I see that kind of thing I have to wonder do those people really believe it?

That's why the Ezra Cohen Watnick phonecall is such a powerful indicator for me.

I don't wish to argue about whether the election was actually stolen, but you guys on this board need to understand that the likes of Cohen Watnick and other top Trump officials didn't think Trump would win in 2020 and never thought for a second the election was stolen, even if they've claimed otherwise publicly.

Cohen Watnick is probably, like the rest of the admin officials on both sides, a power hungry cynic. Powell probably knew this, she probably knows these types of people and knows that randomly calling this guy up and claiming something that at least on the face of it - is fricking wild, is likely to be met with derision and mockery, unless it just so happens to be true.

So she must have believed that part. She must actually have believed that Haspell was in fact in Germany, injured, trying to recover a stolen server.

The only other explanation for that behavior is that she knew it wasn't true but thought that making an idiot of herself to a key player in the national intelligence apparatus was somehow going to be good for her.

I mean, imagine the balls it must take to call up the secretary for defense intelligence and go "hey I'm just some rando lawyer, you're a government official in charge of intel, now let me tell you this insane thing that you should already know but apparently don't for some reason".
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:22 am to
quote:

I don't think he (Trump) has many beliefs other than that he's entitled to praise, attention, wealth, and respect. He'll say or believe whatever he needs to in order to get those things.
If you research "Populist Demagogue," you will find a photo a D.J. Trump.

Honestly, there is an argument that this not necessarily a "Bad Thing." I call it the Peter Wiggin syndrome (from the later OSC books). If a politician SAYS the "right things" AND acts upon them, does it really MATTER whether he really believes them?

(And for Trump voters, he was definitely saying the "right things." The only question relevant to the PWS is whether he then DID the "right things.")
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66548 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:25 am to
Never forget.

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:26 am to
quote:

This is a really interesting thread the more I think about it.

One of the most fascinating things to me is flaws in the human reasoning system
It is one of the better threads in a while, when you ignore the inevitable chaff.

It also takes me back to a very brief discussion a few days past, regarding Haidt's "Righteous Mind" book, where he posits that even MORAL reasoning springs FIRST from emotional reaction and that MUCH of the later justification is just constructed to support that initial reaction.

As an aside, anyone who has NOT read that book should do so, if he actually WANTS to set aside the team jerseys and understand the American political divide.
This post was edited on 8/15/23 at 10:32 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295801 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:28 am to
quote:


What about smart people who didn't get swept up in either moral panic? Like me.


As often as you have to remind people how smart you are, it sure seems like validation seeking behaviors.

Smart people usually don't have to tell others how smart they are on a daily basis.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11424 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:29 am to
quote:

If a politician SAYS the "right things" AND acts upon them, does it really MATTER whether he really believes them?


This is an interesting question and possibly right if that pol really could somehow represent a very wide public interest, but the "right things" he was serving up were really meant to be judged by his 30-35% of the population that of hardcore supporters, while everyone can get fricked.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38636 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:32 am to
Jesus Christ was hung out to dry by people who described him as you describe Powell. Maybe you have that "brain infection".

It's subjective. Ultimate Reality is. Albeit "you can tell a tree by the fruit that it bears and Hunter's Laptop was "Russian Disinformation", per the same people who are 'crucifying' (politically/personally) Trump, Powell, et al, and the 80 million productive people who support our Constitutional Republic version of governance. And resist "fundamental change" to a Global Totalitarian version.

Talk and voting won't solve this type of division. Never has and never will. Separation via the "wheat and the tares" will.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
10849 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:32 am to
Trump literally told his supporters not to vote by mail, so it’s not surprising that the mail-in voting broke overwhelmingly against him. It’s just common sense.

No idea what Sidney Powell was thinking would actually happen, but she went all in with a bluff hand. Repeatedly.

It’s a bizarre case study. I think she volunteered to just keep running with this story to gain fame and popularity. And Trump’s legal team was in favor of anything to provide cover for the fake electors scheme to be released later.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15431 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Yes. LEO protects LEO. That's how our Police State works.


See, that’s the problem, you already know it’s a corrupt system yet you still parrot meaningless statements like “I want them prosecuted too”. You don’t really believe that statement, it only serves as a platitude.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11424 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:35 am to
Yeah, that's a really good book and important psychology relevant to politics. Another idea really relevant to this thread is something called the illusory truth effect which describes a natural tendency to mistake the "fluency" or ease with which an idea moves through one's thinking as a proxy for plausibility or even truth. The more we hear or read an idea, even one that we know isn't true, the more "fluent" it becomes in our thinking and the more seemingly plausible it becomes and this is a basis for the effects of repetitive propaganda that SFP is discussing.
This post was edited on 8/15/23 at 11:13 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295801 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Trump literally told his supporters not to vote by mail, so it’s not surprising that the mail-in voting broke overwhelmingly against him


While I believe there was shenanigans with the election, its not the reason Trump lost.

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Illusory truth effect
Makes perfect sense, though I'd not seen it defined quite that way before.

Thx
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295801 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:47 am to
quote:

You don’t really believe that statement,


His belief depends on how deeply he has dug himself in.

His opening thesis is always too specific and doesn't leave him much wiggle room.
This post was edited on 8/15/23 at 10:49 am
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
10849 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:54 am to
quote:

While I believe there was shenanigans with the election, its not the reason Trump lost.


Everyone already knew that the in-person votes would be tallied first and mail-in votes took longer to count and confirm. Trump’s own people knew the mail-in bump would occur for Biden.

Also interesting (not surprising) that Trump brought in a new postmaster general who removed several mail sorting machines from post offices in the weeks leading up to Election Day, which would slow mail delivery.

Powell would have been made aware of all these things…
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2179 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 10:59 am to
Well when you have Truth the Vote who have investigated hundreds of elections, had some over turned and had some people arrested, even Republicans. Then you might want to take a look at what they are doing and saying. Considering they had video in Georgia of a woman from South Carolina dumping 10 plus ballots per box, going to 26 different ballot boxes a day and going by Stacy Abrams office daily then something is definitely there. It is illegal. They were never even allowed to present a lot of their evidence before. The cases were written off before they ever entered the court house. Anyone who stayed up and watched the elections that night knew there were illegal acts happening. Poll watchers being lied to and told they were done for the night only to keep counting after they left. Poll watchers being locked out. In Arizona people were complaining about election workers trying to force them to use sharpies instead of pens knowing it says on the ballot not to because the machine wont count it. Multiple swing states that Trump was up 100k to 150k votes after midnight to wake up the next morning and he lost by less than 15k with all of that going on. GTFOH.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135504 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 11:00 am to
quote:

I imagine whichever grifter summarized this for you
You have quite the imagination.

Both the cases were well publicized. You have far better access to the case law than do I via Google filters at this stage. The first was in spring of 2020, the second was in early December in the immediate aftermath.

Again, two heavily Democrat counties ignored WI election law. The made no secret of it. The facts were NEVER in dispute. The declaration of no merit was ridiculous!

I'm surprised you were unaware of those cases, and I'm surprised you'd not be more curious now. Look it up.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61972 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Yes, this is a message/discussion board.



So, not emotional thinking?

quote:

It's referenced in OP. Do you want me to list all of the lost lawsuits, sanctions, lawsuits against her, licensure attacks, and now criminal indictments specifically?



None of that shows that what she did was emotional thinking.

You can really see your inability to logically make a case in this exchange.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
34600 posts
Posted on 8/15/23 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Sydney Powell is a sad example of the cost of emotional thinking & going off the deep end


Well, she is a woman.

Allegedly.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram