- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sydney Powell is a sad example of the cost of emotional thinking & going off the deep end
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:31 am to Lg
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:31 am to Lg
quote:
So are there more cult members it the Trump camp, Democrat Russian Collusion hoax or man made climate change? Which one do you fall into?
Its scary how quickly the power brokers effectively put individuals into collectives, and we accept it.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:32 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I find it terribly dishonest that people want to focus on Trumps election bullshite
The Russia hoax should be the evidence anyone needs to explain the other attacks. But again, they will give soft deflections, and still believe Trump did something illegal with Russia because Daily Kos still says he did.
If a government will allow a political opponett to declare to a sitting President that I'm going to entrap Donald Trump and use the full resources of the DOJ and Intel agencies to help me, how in holy hell can you be so dismissive on mass mail-in fraud.
They have already proven the Law means nothing to them.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Oh my.
is not ... Better luck next time
How would you characterize that assine ruling?
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:34 am to riccoar
quote:
They have already proven the Law means nothing to them.
Rule of law was destroyed by activism.
True believers in high places.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:37 am to moneyg
quote:
No. Observation and analysis of numbers isn't emotional...even if it turns out to be wrong
Her emotional reaction came before "observation and analysis of numbers", though.
She immediately thought "this election was fraudulent" and then went find data (from whatever source) backed this "gut reaction"
You combined 2 steps into 1.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
his prosecution is the most authoritarian takeover in my lifetime
That should be the only thing that matters. Taking shots at Powell and the rest of the indicted is just scoring pollical points. It's disingenuous at best.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The overt act would have been filing a lawsuit relying on the same political puffery, to compare to this Trump scenario
What corroborating evidence was used in getting a FISA court to issue a surveillance warrant used to spy on Trump. And did those who presented the evidence know it was all a LIE? And yet, not ONE prosecution.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:39 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
If that were true, the ambulance chaser industry would disintegrate overnight.
This makes, literally, no sense.
I'd estimate the % of auto-liability claims that get liability against the defense is over 98%. Probably over 99%.
Clear liability is the literal opposite of "some esoteric belief that a result was fraudulent".
quote:
I've already cited evidence of thousands of WI votes cast illegally.
Have you? You didn't even summarize the ruling correctly.
quote:
There were constitutional breaches in PA, and GA.
Cite me the rulings.
quote:
There was the still unexplained midnight count pause, with huge Biden jumps in every single such instance on count resumption.
Not legitimate evidence. Seems fishy? Certainly, but you have to actually get evidence of the acts.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:40 am to riccoar
quote:
The Russia hoax should be the evidence anyone needs to explain the other attacks.
Wait...what?
quote:
But again, they will give soft deflections, and still believe Trump did something illegal with Russia because Daily Kos still says he did.
What about smart people who didn't get swept up in either moral panic? Like me.
What's your theory there?
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:41 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
How would you characterize that assine ruling?
Based off the article, Trump's team didn't file within the correct statutory period. Bad lawyers are a hallmark of Trump's history as President, so it's not shocking.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:41 am to loogaroo
quote:
Taking shots at Powell and the rest of the indicted is just scoring pollical points
...how?
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:42 am to Lg
quote:
What corroborating evidence was used in getting a FISA court to issue a surveillance warrant used to spy on Trump. And did those who presented the evidence know it was all a LIE? And yet, not ONE prosecution.
Can you read? I already said those people should have been prosecuted.
Those people aren't Adam Schiff, which is what you quoted a comment about.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:44 am to SDVTiger
quote:The average IQ for an attorney is only 114. I tend to agree that this is "not very bright." Only the 84th percentile.
Attorneys for the most part are ... not very bright
The average IQ for the top law schools is between 130 and 135. Starting to get into "bright" territory there. 98th percentile.
Powell attended UNC, which is JUST outside that top tier. Given that she did not graduate with any honors, it is reasonable to infer that her IQ is somewhere near or just below that median.
This post was edited on 8/15/23 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:It was the GOP. The court ruled that Trump’s challenge to voters who were indefinitely confined was without merit which based on the previous suit was preposterous. The basis for "too late" was the election had already occurred.
Based off the article, Trump's team didn't file within the correct statutory period.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I already said those people should have been prosecuted.
But that almost never happens and you’re well aware of that, which makes the “those people should have been prosecuted too” a meaningless statement.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Powell's "gut reaction" (aka emotional reaction) was that the elections were fraudulent (my argument is this was due to echo chamber repetition melting her brain).
Legitimate empirical evidence did not back this claim up.
She sought bias-confirming evidence from people who also had the same emotional reaction that the election was fraudulent.
none of the above.
she hoped that by assisting trump to defile the election and taking over she could have a seat at the table during trump as dictator.
TD posters frequently quoted her stories.
fell for it.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:48 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
It was the GOP. The court ruled that Trump’s challenge to voters who were indefinitely confined was without merit which based on the previous suit was preposterous. The basis for "too late" was the election had already occurred.
You're going to need to find the actual case b/c I imagine whichever grifter summarized this for you did it intentionally incorrectly.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:48 am to SlowFlowPro
Every time Powell spoke on camera it seemed she was losing her grip on
rationality.
Posted on 8/15/23 at 9:50 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
But that almost never happens and you’re well aware of that,
Yes. LEO protects LEO. That's how our Police State works.
I've tried to explain this to "Back the Blue" types for years.
quote:
which makes the “those people should have been prosecuted too” a meaningless statement.
It was in direct response to a question about the propriety of the behaviors
It had the perfect meaning for the actual discussion tree involved.
I apologize words on a message board don't constitute revolution
This post was edited on 8/15/23 at 9:51 am
Popular
Back to top


0







