- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on using AEA to deport Venezuelans.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:10 pm
Get fricked Boasberg.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:11 pm to bhtigerfan
ADA?
Americans with Disabilities Act?

Americans with Disabilities Act?
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:11 pm to bhtigerfan
He can’t keep getting away with this!
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:13 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
Americans with Disabilities Act?
Can I volunteer to break some spines before deportation? That's what that means, right?
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:13 pm to bhtigerfan
SFP isn't going to like this, not one bit.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:15 pm to Azkiger
quote:
SFP isn't going to like this, not one bit.
That stupid bitch is wrong again
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:16 pm to Azkiger
Yeah, his boyfriend's sphincter is going to be aching.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:18 pm to bhtigerfan
Trump supporters that are disappointed that Black Monday did not come today will have their enthusiasm quelled over this ruling.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:27 pm to bhtigerfan
Yes, and no.
It does tell Boasberg to get fricked because it vacated his TROs and concluded he didn't have jurisdiction.
AEA can only be challenged through a habeas petition, and that can only be brought in the district where they are held (which ain't DC).
The order does require notice to the person getting the AEA bounce so they can file a habeas petition. It also noted there is limited judicial review of AEA as to whether the interpretation and application are constitutional.
So, it's a solid double, but it's not a home run.
It does tell Boasberg to get fricked because it vacated his TROs and concluded he didn't have jurisdiction.
AEA can only be challenged through a habeas petition, and that can only be brought in the district where they are held (which ain't DC).
The order does require notice to the person getting the AEA bounce so they can file a habeas petition. It also noted there is limited judicial review of AEA as to whether the interpretation and application are constitutional.
So, it's a solid double, but it's not a home run.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:27 pm to bhtigerfan
Finally this lawfare is getting pushback
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:30 pm to bhtigerfan
Good news for America and that which American voter's voted for!
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:32 pm to Azkiger
quote:
SFP isn't going to like this, not one bit.
It was his opinion on his interpretation of the Constitution. I’m sure glad the Supreme Court disagrees with him, lol.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:36 pm to udtiger
quote:
It also noted there is limited judicial review of AEA as to whether the interpretation and application are constitutional
This seems to split with the post-WW2 case that was making the rounds immediately after.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:40 pm to Sofaking2
Anyone that passed the bar and is able to be objective already knew this. SFP allegedly has 1 of those traits
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:50 pm to bhtigerfan
Excellent. Lets gas up the planes
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:51 pm to Bourre
quote:
That stupid bitch is wrong again
This was not a ruling on the merits, scholar
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:54 pm to bhtigerfan
So Boasberg is not the CIC and an authority on national security?
Popular
Back to top

21












