- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:56 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
This seems to split with the post-WW2 case that was making the rounds immediately after.
It opens the door at the least
It certainly isn't as cut and dry as many on here declared.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 6:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This was not a ruling on the merits, scholar
You think they were just flipping a coin, heads ‘for’ tails ‘against’ and she got tails?
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
It cut that dictator Boasberg off at the legs however.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:11 pm to antibarner
So, are we done with this or not?
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:12 pm to bhtigerfan
@bunk Moreland
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:13 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
You think they were just flipping a coin, heads ‘for’ tails ‘against’ and she got tails?
The merits of the AEA argument. That's still going to be litigated.
This was a procedural ruling without tipping the cap a little about the merits, but by no means a definitive foreshadow, imho
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:17 pm to jbdawgs03
This is what I said last week.
That said, I hope you guys are comfortable with a Dem president making unreviewable decisions on who is a terrorist or gang member.
quote:
For the record, I hate the case with the Turkish girl based on what we know.
I don't like the Khalil situation, but it's a little murkier. If .gov has good evidence he has provided material support for Hamas, toss him. If it's just words, I don't like it. That's Israel first.
On Tren de Aragua, I hate to say it, but if 200 foreign gang thugs were properly deported and one or two good eggs wound up on the mix, that's the way the ball bounces. But, there is also a part of me that feels there must be some review of the executive/administrative process.
That said, I hope you guys are comfortable with a Dem president making unreviewable decisions on who is a terrorist or gang member.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:33 pm to bhtigerfan
Supposedly Judges don’t like to be overruled on their opinions or decisions. These lawfare twerps seem not to think that it matters
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:33 pm to Bourre
quote:
SFP isn't going to like this, not one bit.
quote:
That stupid bitch is wrong again
He’s so high on the smell of his own farts, I’m sure he’ll explain why the Supreme Court is wrong and he knows more about constitutional law than they do.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:40 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
He’s so high on the smell of his own farts, I’m sure he’ll explain why the Supreme Court is wrong
I don't have to
If you were smart enough to understand why, you'd have known that prior to making yourself look silly (like always)
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:44 pm to bhtigerfan
I hope we hear of his demise ASAP.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:51 pm to Nosevens
quote:
Supposedly Judges don’t like to be overruled on their opinions or decisions. These lawfare twerps seem not to think that it matters
It wouldn't have mattered. There was zero chance Trump was going to listen to the previous law fare.
That boy was never coming back into our country.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You’re the worst sort of idiot, the type that so stupid you’re oblivious to the fact you are in fact an idiot.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:54 pm to bhtigerfan
I don’t see why either the Trumpists or the wise Latina or Ms Jackson are hyperventilating. All nine justices agree that due process applies. Barrett didn’t even join with much of the dissent’s opinion.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:09 pm to udtiger
quote:
udtiger
Appreciate the nuance. People are downvoting but posts like yours really add to the discussion imo
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:22 pm to udtiger
quote:
It also noted there is limited judicial review of AEA
Where does the AEA say it includes limited judicial review?
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:22 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
You’re the worst sort of idiot, the type that so stupid you’re oblivious to the fact you are in fact an idiot.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 8:24 pm to CDawson
quote:
Where does the AEA say it includes limited judicial review?
I mean, it's a law. By default it's going to be subject to some judicial review.
Our legal system isn't based in "trust me bro" analysis.
This is from the ruling today:
quote:
The detainees also sought equitable relief against summary removal. Although judicial review under the AEA is limited, we have held that an individual subject to detention and removal under that statute is entitled to “‘judicial review’” as to “questions of interpretation and constitutionality” of the Act as well as whether he or she “is in fact an alien enemy fourteen years of age or older.” Ludecke, 335 U. S., at 163-164, 172, n. 17. (Under the Proclamation, the term “alien enemy” is defined to include “all Venezuelan citizens 14 years of age or older who are members of TdA, are within the United States, and are not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents of the United States.” 90 Fed. Reg. 13034.) The detainees’ rights against summary removal, however, are not currently in dispute. The Government expressly agrees that “TdA members subject to removal under the Alien Enemies Act get judicial review.” Reply in Support of Application To Vacate 1. “It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law” in the context of removal proceedings. Reno v. Flores, 507 U. S. 292, 306 (1993). So, the detainees are entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard “appropriate to the nature of the case.”
Nobody tell Darth, but this is the USSC saying, "SFP was right"
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 8:25 pm
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News