Started By
Message

re: Supreme Court halts turn over of Trump tax returns

Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118668 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

My favorite is that his tax returns will show he is not worth what he says he is. Clowns.



Because my income tax returns always list all of my assets and properties.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Explains quite a bit, when paired with your posting history.

Yep

Basically just a loser who is envious
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Supreme Court halts turn over of Trump tax returns


Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

This isn't correct.


Starting at least with Nixon (and excluding Ford who did not stand for election) show me who did not (besides Trump)?

I think I am not the moron you imply and actually lived through all that time while you may have just read something from Wik. Granted I am old and my memory is no longer perfect but still pretty good.
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:12 pm to
quote:


If he is so smart and wealthy, what is the big deal?


Its none of your fricking business is the big deal, the IRS has had him under audit for a fricking decade, if there was a problem they know how to prosecute.

You and Congress and the SDNY can all go frick yourself
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Starting at least with Nixon (and excluding Ford who did not stand for election) show me who did not (besides Trump)?

You said 100%. I point out that 100% SINCE Nixon is NOT 100% total.

Sorry. It's not a requirement. I get that you don't like it. But it isn't a requirement. It wasn't even a requirement for those that CHOSE to do it.

quote:

I think I am not the moron you imply and actually lived through all that time while you may have just read something from Wik. Granted I am old and my memory is no longer perfect but still pretty good.

I'm 52. Oh, and I'm in no danger of making less than 36K per year..........even in retirement.

Not my fault you're envious
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

excluding Ford who did not stand for election


Ford/Dole lost to Carter/Mondale in 76.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81342 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:16 pm to
Finally a W. Been a rough week.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146550 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:17 pm to
quote:





LINK
Didn't this return show up in the reporters mailbox at work? Client Copy hmmmmmm....
This post was edited on 11/18/19 at 1:18 pm
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5844 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:18 pm to
I am sure this board will be Ok with this when a DEM does this exact same thing.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101295 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

I am sure this board will be Ok with this when a DEM does this exact same thing.


Ehhh, 99.99% chance I won't vote for that person regardless. I certainly won't be hinging my vote on it either way.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123780 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Perhaps he is neither smart or wealthy and all this is a house of cards?
and? you are entitled to tax voyeurism, why?

Many folks posit Michelle has a penis. Does that mean they are entitled to see her naked?
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81342 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

What is next?


Prolly a sky screamer from the IRS leaking DJTs taxes
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

I don't care how much money DJT avoids paying the IRS.


Neither do I, but I do care about conflicts of interest and other points that indicate his ability to tell the truth and lead the country. I am part New York Sicilian and sure his old man did business with the mob in the old days. If the son replaced the Italians for the Russians it is in the country's interest to know about it.

This has nothing to do with paying the taxes and everything to do with if you are clean as a businessman. Kennedy's old man was mobbed up and a bootlegger and I feel sure would have come under way more scrutiny in the modern media. Hoover never acknowledged there was a mob because he was gay and they blackmailed him. What if the Russian have financial blackmail on the current POTUS? Would you not want to know this?

While I agree the parties should have less input but a neutral 3rd party could at least tell us if the returns are kosher.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22772 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Nobody wants to see them and I am not a public figure


Wrong. I want to see them. The law does not care in this instance if you are a public figure. Post your returns! Why are you taking such a defensive position about them?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123780 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

but I do care about conflicts of interest
False narrative. You don't need tax records to make that case.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I am sure this board will be Ok with this when a DEM does this exact same thing.

Frankly, I hope Trump has started a permanent trend and that none release.

That said. Sure. If any of the assholes who spent the last 4 years demanding them begs off, frick them. They deserve whatever rhetoric hits them.

But, it's stupid on its face to release them. It serves literally zero purpose.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123780 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I am sure this board will be Ok with this when a DEM does this exact same thing.
Don't know about the board, but I am 100% fine with it.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54617 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Ford/Dole lost to Carter/Mondale in 76.


Ford was never elected.

My point stands...

At no point was Ford a duly elected POTUS

Nixon = elected
Ford = appointed
Carter = elected

If he lost the general election in 76 he was NEVER elected POTUS
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37447 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:27 pm to
It’s always been about tax returns and embarrassing Trump for not being as rich as he brags he is
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram