- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:54 pm to jatilen
I’ve tried to warn everyone here repeatedly that your guns are useless if you go to prison not only for using them to defend yourself but showing them to defend yourself.
Brush it off if you wish, point out that the governor will pardon, say this wouldn’t happen in Alabama or some other Deep South state, say no jury will convict...
Do so at your own peril.
These are the first steps on a fast track path that we are proceeding down.
I’m warning you again.
Brush it off if you wish, point out that the governor will pardon, say this wouldn’t happen in Alabama or some other Deep South state, say no jury will convict...
Do so at your own peril.
These are the first steps on a fast track path that we are proceeding down.
I’m warning you again.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:55 pm to jatilen
quote:Hinckley should be disbarred, and charged with criminal interference.
Gardner’s Assistant Circuit Attorney Chris Hinckley ordered crime lab workers to fix the gun so it could be fired.
A key component of Missouri law states that a gun must be “readily capable of lethal use” in order for someone to be charged with the crime. Hinckley signed the court document, known as the complaint, saying the weapon was capable of lethal use.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:55 pm to jatilen
This looks like the groundwork for another excuse to riot. What they did or didn’t do will be irrelevant. They’ll be portrayed as guilty white people who were unlawfully proven innocent or worse yet pardoned. You see this is systemic racism. Riot. Loot. Burn. Repeat.
Dumbasses.
Dumbasses.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:55 pm to BobABooey
quote:
5. Subdivisions (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), and (10) of subsection 1 of this section shall not apply to persons who are engaged in a lawful act of defense pursuant to section 563.031, RSMo.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:56 pm to ezride25
At this point, let St Louis burn. Put walls up on the outside and shoot anyone trying to escape.
They already filmed one Escape From film there and are due to do another.
They already filmed one Escape From film there and are due to do another.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:57 pm to jatilen
Injustica.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:57 pm to BobABooey
quote:
5. Subdivisions (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), and (10) of subsection 1 of this section shall not apply to persons who are engaged in a lawful act of defense pursuant to section 563.031, RSMo.
563.031
quote:
2. A person shall not use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section unless: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself, or herself or her unborn child, or another against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony; (2) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle lawfully occupied by such person; or (3) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section. 3. A person does not have a duty to retreat: (1) From a dwelling, residence, or vehicle where the person is not unlawfully entering or unlawfully remaining; (2) From private property that is owned or leased by such individual; or
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:58 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Truly frightening times we live in. Would love to know the demographics of the grand jury that rendered this verdict
They be from the Ferguson zip code....lol!
Posted on 10/6/20 at 3:59 pm to jatilen
Call the Police when your home is threatened.
Police arrest you for defending your property.
ANY LIB WANT TO DEFEND THAT?
Police arrest you for defending your property.
ANY LIB WANT TO DEFEND THAT?
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:00 pm to BobABooey
quote:
any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner
The PoPo made it ready to fire.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:01 pm to BobABooey
Missouri RS 571:030
Someone didn’t read the whole statute
Someone didn’t read the whole statute
quote:
5. Subdivisions (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), and (10) of subsection 1 of this section shall not apply to persons who are engaged in a lawful act of defense pursuant to section 563.031.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:02 pm to jatilen
The most powerful people in your local government: the DA and the Sheriff.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:02 pm to jatilen
This is where data mining has allowed deep state actors to hand select grand jurors.
This is how you imprison your political enemies and deter dissenters.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:03 pm to DingLeeBerry
quote:
They spoke at the RNC. I’m sure that was enough for some of the jurors.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:04 pm to jatilen
quote:
St. Louis grand jury indicts McCloskeys
It's getting close to time fellas.......
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:05 pm to jatilen
The one and only reason these former liberal lawyers were indicted was an act of revenge by Obamamites because POTUS mentioned their plight on Network TV coverage.
They know it has 0.0 chance of success, but that's not the point to social scumbag justice tripe.
They know it has 0.0 chance of success, but that's not the point to social scumbag justice tripe.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:07 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Would love to know the demographics of the grand jury that rendered this verdict
It’s not hard to see if you use a little colorful imagination.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:11 pm to MasonTiger
didn't their lawyer or someone say how badly the state was going to get slaughtered if it goes to trial?
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:18 pm to BobABooey
quote:
2005 Missouri Revised Statutes - § 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons--exceptions--penalties.
quote:
571.030. 1. A person commits the crime of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly: (4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or
Anyone know if this statue still applies to protect yourself or others?
Grand jury must have been made up of BLMs, ANTIFAs and retards.
Sorry. Redundant.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News