Started By
Message

re: Speaker Johnson just announced Republicans will be introducing a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:46 pm to
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
6438 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Speaker Johnson just announced Republicans will be introducing a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT to BLOCK Democrats from packing the Supreme Court


Do want. Never going to happen. Just covering for the grotesque CR that trump will sign more than likely because of midterms. The thing we have to all realize is that neither party will touch a balanced budget as it is political suicide. Neither side wants a super majority as they would be held accountable for what they pass into legislation. The machine can make this happen because of blue states. Nothing will change without an uprising from the public of epic proportions. In other words, status quo. It hurts me to the core.
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
3927 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:13 pm to
This is going to go nowhere.
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
5175 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

What would the age limits be?

He said term limits, not age limits.
If I were King, I'd set Representatives at 5 terms (10 years) and Senators at 2 terms (12 years).
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
9772 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:35 pm to
Correct, going nowhere. It’s good to get it out there for a possibility in the future, but right now there should be maximum pressure by republicans from both chambers and every other direction on Thune to get the fricking SAVE act passed. That should be the only focus for republicans in congress right now.

Majority are feckless pussies only there to enrich themselves and look pretty for their friends.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
93764 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:38 pm to
This fricking clown
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
38186 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

Do want. Never going to happen. Just covering for the grotesque CR that trump will sign more than likely because of midterms. The thing we have to all realize is that neither party will touch a balanced budget as it is political suicide. Neither side wants a super majority as they would be held accountable for what they pass into legislation. The machine can make this happen because of blue states. Nothing will change without an uprising from the public of epic proportions. In other words, status quo. It hurts me to the core.

I love it when the very officials of whom various actions have been demanded (and thoroughly trashed unless and until they do initiate the process to do so), only to be met with more doubt, cynicism, and yes even more trashing. It’s kinda hard to blame them for not acknowledging some folks amongst us with their loud, nonstop griping, and yes once again, our old friend “trashing” as well.
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3698 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:35 am to
Great idea and probably is exactly what we should do, but zero chance this passes as a CA.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
9528 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 12:45 am to
quote:

A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT requires TWO THIRDS of both the House and the SENATE to APPROVE it. And then 3/4 of the STATES.

This is EMPTY POLITICAL THEATER from a DO-NOTHING Republican Congress.


This is the correct answer. The only way any amendment could possibly happen with such a divided gov't is an Article 5 convention. I would love to see that occur.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
50068 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:26 am to
quote:

They don't care that we will just add more justices when we gain power back.

if they get control of all 3 branches w e will come under one party forever - this group of DEMS is evil to the core
Posted by Deadmanshand
Member since Jun 2026
526 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 5:41 am to
quote:

I believe you are mistaken, but I’d love to be proven wrong - so show some proof please…


Nope. Nine was set in 1869 by the Judiciary Act, not an article or amendment. The US Constitution is extremely vague about the judicial branch.
Posted by Robcrzy
Mandeville
Member since Nov 2007
1650 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 5:45 am to
little too late Republicans are about to lose the House.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
9044 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 5:52 am to
quote:

Nine was set in 1869 by the Judiciary Act, not an article or amendment.
per dems Trump can’t make upgrades to govt infrastructure, as it’s some kind of longstanding precedent, but I’ll be damned add more and more justices.

Democrats are such anti-American scum.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
25506 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:56 am to
If the midterms are lost, this is far too little far too late. Without the SAVE act none of this matters.
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
17410 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:58 am to
Agreed on the Supreme Court

No to term limits.

Think it through.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
71698 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:24 am to
quote:

What would the age limits be?


Cap it at the SS age. In Louisiana, I think our maximum age to run for judge is 70 at the time of qualifying.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 7:26 am
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
40363 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:25 am to
They really do think we are stupid. This is a play for mid terms with a snowball chance in Hell of even getting out of the House.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60848 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:40 am to
quote:

This is a good start. Next do term limits.


Or defining a "natural born citizen" as "a child born of at least one person who is a legal citizen of the United States at the time of the child's birth."
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38739 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:47 am to
Oh yay, theater that’s going nowhere.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
173310 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:48 am to
Distraction. Its like watching them do nothing and protest voter id because their buds the democrats would cease to exist...

So look squirrel look-look at this shiney object:we know we allowed Speaker Hakeem, so we will PRETEND again we will NOT stop them but pretend we will stop their tactics...

As they all vote in their next COLA raise and slush their funds, we pay their car leases, per diem rent money... and laugh at us.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38739 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:48 am to
quote:

It's election season. It would require 38 out of 50 states to ratify the change...what are the chances of it passing?

Negative infinity would be too high of an estimate.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram