Started By
Message

re: Speaker Johnson just announced Republicans will be introducing a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:48 am to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38572 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:48 am to
quote:

It's election season. It would require 38 out of 50 states to ratify the change...what are the chances of it passing?

Negative infinity would be too high of an estimate.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
71311 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:51 am to
Some other amendments that I would like to see:
1. A one object and germaneness rule for bills passed by Congress. I would have it copy Louisiana’s constitutional provisions. Basically, if your non-budget bill is about more than one thing, it’s unconstitutional. It also blocks legislators from adding irrelevant amendments and has teeth to be enforced (unlike our current rules).

2. Mandatory retirement age for congress/senators. If we can’t get term limits, this would be the next best thing. Cap it at 72.

3. Repeal the 19th Amendment. Return election of Senators to state legislatures with a baked in provision that creates a mechanism for legislatures to recall and remove their senators at any time.

4. Clarifying the 2nd Amendment to remove all limits on civilians owning any and all military equipment, firearms, etc. Clarifying the definition of arms as broadly as possible, and only allowing for the right to be revoked upon conviction for certain crimes until restitution and probation has finished. I would also consider a provision where by governments can only mandate an area be “gun free” if it actually has controlled access security that checks for guns (like having to go through security to enter a courthouse or airport). Private property owners can set whatever policy they want.

Some others that I am not 100% sold on, but would consider:
1. Abolishing the income tax
2. Eliminating the filibuster (or at least lowering the threshold to end it from 60 votes to 55).
3. Setting up more defined rules on how congressional districts are drawn to attempt to clamp down on gerrymandering and get more geographically concise districts that reflect natural and cultural boundaries and take the practice out of partisan hands.
4. Expanding the number of seats in the house of representatives significantly so that each representative represents fewer people.
5. Eliminate birthright citizenship for people born here to parents on tourism or education visas or on expired or non-existent visas.
6. Assign electoral votes based on congressional districts. The candidate which wins the popular vote in that state gets the two electoral votes from the Senators.
7. Give territories above a certain population threshold one voting representative in the House. Only states get senators.
8. Create some sort of mechanism and metric by which federal judges can be regularly recalled and removed by Congress for malfeasance like ignoring SCOTUS rulings on cases remanded to them or repeatedly exceeding their authority.

Just a few ideas I had this morning.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8766 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Trump should threaten to pack the court. That'll make it pass.


He definitely should say, "if the democrats vote against not expanding the SC, then we will move immediately to expand it to 14." Nothing like being boxed in a corner with no way out.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10884 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:17 am to
Why not take advantage, expand the Supreme Court to 15 and the federal judiciary by 25% and pack the whole system with young Republicans?

Pass that bill before midterms...as long as Republicans keep the Senate...easy peasy.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 8:51 am
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
67050 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:37 am to
It's almost like they expect to lose the majority.

Otherwise, why would they worry?
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12257 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

quote:
What would the age limits be?

He said term limits, not age limits.
If I were King, I'd set Representatives at 5 terms (10 years) and Senators at 2 terms (12 years).


Age should have something to do with it if they are in their 80's and become senator...that's kind of old to be handling govt issues.
Posted by Sams Crow
Idaho
Member since Apr 2026
640 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:45 am to
This wont ever pass. Dims have already openly shown their corrupt face in many ways. They just dont give a crap. Sure they'll pay some lip service, but then vote it down.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram